UN Wants Annihilation of Israel

Sure, that statement sounds a little on the harsh side.  However, if the UN is attempting to disarm Israel from its nukes, Israel will be weakened and could face annihilation.  Of course, this won't happen because I've read the Word, and Israel is not destroyed.  But, the godless UN members have no knowledge of the Bible, so they don't have a clue that Israel will one day be the victor over its enemies.

The anti-Israel crowd likes to say that if Iran is not permitted to have nukes, why should Israel be allowed.  This is such a ludicrous statement because it's rather obvious to anyone who is paying close attention to what is going on that Israel has nukes to protect itself from its many enemies, and besides, the Jewish nation is the only sane one in the entire region.  Iran, on the other hand, has nukes to annihilate Israel.

Read from Breitbart:

UN DEMANDS NUCLEAR INSPECTIONS IN ISRAEL

The UN General Assembly approved a resolution on Monday by a vote of 174-6 that would require Israel to open its nuclear program to inspection “without further delay.” The only countries voting against it were the U.S., Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau.  

And the animus toward Israel doesn’t stop there; the UN also wants to convene a meeting to ban nuclear weapons from the Middle East, which would leave Israel vastly outnumbered and essentially helpless against the Islamic hordes wishing to eradicate it.

There was supposed to be a similar meeting this month in Helsinki, Finland, with all the Arab states and Iran in attendance, but the U.S. turned it down, supposedly because of the trouble in the Middle East and Iran’s intransigence on nuclear weaponry. Israel has never confirmed that it possesses nuclear weapons and has never joined the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), but then, neither have India, Pakistan, and North Korea, all of which possess nuclear weapons. 

Iranian diplomat Khodadad Seifi hissed, “The truth is that the Israeli regime is the only party which rejected to conditions for a conference.” He vented that there should be "strong pressure on that regime to participate in the conference without any preconditions."

Israeli diplomat Isi Yanouka defended Israel, noting that Iran and Syria are not exactly friendly neighbors: "All these cases challenge Israel's security and cast a dark shadow at the prospect of embarking on a meaningful regional security process. The fact that the sponsors include in this anti-Israeli resolution language referring to the 2012 conference proves above all the ill-intent of the Arab states with regard to this conference."

In a stunning display of the moral equivalence  at the UN, Syrian diplomat Abdullah Hallak told the UN that Syria was furious that the Helsinki conference was postponed because of "the whim of just one party, a party with nuclear warheads. We call on the international community to put pressure on Israel to accept the NPT, get rid of its arsenal and delivery systems, in order to allow for peace and stability in our region.”

Although the Obama Administration voted against the resolution as a whole, they voted for two paragraphs stipulating that all nations on earth adhere to the NPT and assert that countries that don’t adhere to it ratify the NPT at “the earliest date.” Only Israel and India objected. Guess which two countries are the most threatened by Islamic neighbors?

Israel is the canary in the coal mine at the UN; the ultimate target is the U.S. Everyone has known for decades that the UN is a tool for Islamist domination. Why are we there, why are we funding it, and when will we have a president who finally has the guts to say we’re pulling out?