These libs had better watch their step. Do they really think it would be wise to post the names of rich people who do not give to charities? Do they not realize it would be their base that would make up the list? We're on to them and are fully aware of the fact that liberals are tight with their money; it's the conservatives who generously give to charities.
Read the latest suggestion from Zbigniew Brzezinski, via Weasel Zippers:
Former Carter Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski On OWS: There Should Be A List Of Very Wealthy Who Do Not Give To Charity…
"Brilliant idea, hand over a list of targets to a group of radicals with a predisposition to violence.
'You know, I’ve been looking at these worldwide riots that are developing. They’re all a reflection of deep passion, deep resentment and fear. Now the question is “Where will this go? How can this be sort of concretized?” And one thought that has occurred to me — and let me sort of mention it here casually without having really thought it through systematically — I think it would be increasingly helpful if there was a movement to publish, worldwide, lists of who make, largely through speculation, enormous amounts of money almost instantly, and basically hide the fact from their social context. You know, how many Americans are really fully aware of how many other good people, let’s say like Warren Buffett and others, who really donate a lot of their earnings to charities, to philanthropy? But how many more are there in the hedge funds, in the banks, in a variety of other places, who, on the basis of speculation, literally make millions of dollars that would take a century or two for the average person ever to make? I’d like to see those lists. And they shouldn’t be that difficult to produce.'