The United Church of Christ Exposed

When President Obama speaks of his "Christian faith", we must remember the church of which he attended for twenty years under the notorious Jeremiah Wright. Trinity U.C.C. is part of the United Church of Christ which takes some rather bizarre positions on key issues.

Before becoming a Bible-believing Christian, I belonged to the United Church of Christ and was married in that denomination. Of course, I was a wacko liberal in those days. But, I have since seen the light. In fact, when my husband and I chose to leave the U.C.C., our pastor showed up at our house on two different occasions trying to talk us out of leaving. And it wasn't as though we were donating large sums of money in the offering plate during that era of our lives.

Not once did I hear from the U.C.C. pulpit the message that all have sinned and need to ask for forgiveness in order to be saved from sin and receive eternal life. It was just a general discussion of faith with no specifics mentioned.

Nevertheless, back to the positions taken by this particular denomination. They fit in beautifully with those of President Obama. No wonder he felt so comfortable at his church. The Reverend Barry Lynn from the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State is an ordained minister with the U.C.C. No surprise there.

In 1971, two years before abortion became the law of the land, the U.C.C. took a stand in favor of abortion and even supports the gruesome partial-birth abortion procedure, not to mention including abortion in healthcare coverage. In 1976, the U.C.C. defended gay marriage. Nobody was discussing the topic in 1976, but the U.C.C. thought it should become legal.

Why Was Hatem Abudayyeh Visiting the White House?

It's a small world after all. What is the likelihood that a Muslim man with ties to terrorists has visited the White House? In a normal presidency, the odds would be quite low, but in an Obama nation, they are regrettably high.

Read from Weasel Zippers:

Visitor Logs Show Muslim Man Whose Home Was Raided by FBI For Ties to Palestinian Terrorists Visited White House in April…

"This regime is infested with radicals from top to bottom…

Here’s the AP report on Hatem Abudayyeh’s arrest:


'FBI agents in Chicago took a laptop and documents from the home of a Palestinian-American anti-war activist in an attempt to silence his advocacy, an attorney said Sunday.

The FBI on Friday searched eight addresses in Minneapolis and Chicago, including the home of Hatem Abudayyeh, who is the executive director of the Arab American Action Network, attorney Jim Fennerty told The Associated Press.

“The government’s trying to quiet activists,” Fennerty said. “This case is really scary.”

More than half a dozen agents went to Abudayyeh’s home on Friday and took any documents containing the word “Palestine,” Fennerty said.

Abudayyeh, a U.S. citizen whose parent immigrated from Palestine, wasn’t home at the time of the raid because he was at a hospital with his mother who is battling liver cancer, Fennerty said.'


Now here’s a screenshot of the White House visitor log showing Hatem Abudayyeh visiting on April 22, 2010":




Unless, of course, this is a different Hatem Abudayyeh who visited the White House, just like it was a different Malik Shabazz.

Deja Vu

Why on earth did it take so long for people to see the parallels between Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama? I've been discussing the similarities for over two years. The biggest difference between the two is that Carter is simply a bumbling idiot, whereas Obama is well aware of what he is doing. He is purposely attempting to collapse our economy so that he can remake America into his version of a socialist utopia.

Read from Human Events:

VIDEO: Carter and Obama, Mirror Images
by Ben Shapiro

"Across the political spectrum, commentators and voters are beginning to realize that the Obama Administration doesn't merely seem familiar -- it reeks of deja vu. Obama's tendency toward self-canonization, his control freak tendencies, and his utter administrative incompetence don't seem like a Lady Gaga-esque tribute to Jimmy Carter -- they seem like a direct rip from the Carter Playbook. Whether it's mishandling an environmental catastrophe (Three Mile Island/Gulf oil spill), kowtowing to Iranian dictators (Ayatollah Khomeini/Mahmoud Ahmadinejad), destroying the economy (stagflation/stagflation), or simply spouting hope and change, Carter and Obama are mirror images of one another.

Don't believe me? Check this out:

One Nation Working Together

Saturday, October 2nd will be a big day in DC for the libs. After Glenn Beck's huge turnout at the 8/28 event, progressives are bound and determined to make a success out of their "One Nation Working Together" (to destroy America) event.

I heard a woman call in to Rush Limbaugh's radio program today stating that her sister in Michigan told her that the NEA is providing a bus for teachers in her area to attend the rally. What a wonderful way to spend teachers' union dues. You going, Diogenes?

Check out the long list of socialists, commies, and other radicals who are endorsing the event, via The Blaze.

One Nation’ Rally Exposes Coalition of Far-Left Organizations

"According to the One Nation Working Together site, 'more than 400 organizations, representing tens of thousands of individuals who have endorsed the One Nation Working Together campaign' have signed on as partners for the Oct. 2 rally in Washington, D.C.

This movement includes human and civil rights organizations, unions and trade associations, nonprofit organizations, youth and student groups, religious and other faith groups, educational, peace, environmental, and ethnic associations, and any other groups and individuals who are committed to pulling our country back together now.

President Barack Obama’s own Organizing for America has praised the effort, calling it the 'biggest progressive demonstration in decades.' The list of organizations offering their official endorsements for Saturday’s 'One Nation' rally reads like a who’s who of the far-left in America, including some usual suspects:

AFL-CIO

American Federation of Teachers

Center for Community Change

Green for All

NAACP

National Council of La Raza

Rainbow PUSH Coalition

SEIU: Service Employees International Union

Sojourners

UAW, International Union

AFSCME

Alliance for Democracy

Campaign for America’s Future

Campaign for Peace and Democracy

Campus Progress

Chicago Democratic Socialists of America

Code Pink

Color of Change.org

Communist Party USA (CPUSA)

Democratic Socialists of America

Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN)

Gray Panthers

Human Rights Campaign

International Socialist Organization

National Education Association

National Urban League

Planned Parenthood

United Steel Workers

Working Families Party

Ya Ya Network

For the complete published list of organizations, click here."

He's Not His Brother's Keeper

At a stop at a bbq in New Mexico, President Obama was questioned about his "Christian faith". Among other things, he made the following comment:

"I came to my Christian faith later in life and it was because the precepts of Jesus Christ spoke to me in terms of the kind of life that I would want to lead — being my brothers’ and sisters’ keeper, treating others as they would treat me."

Now, let's dissect this comment. He speaks of being his brother's keeper. Does that include his half-brother who lives in a Kenyan hut on a mere $20 a year? Could it possibly mean his aunt living in public housing in Boston? I didn't think so.

Lesson to be learned: Barack Obama will say ANYTHING to appeal to voters, but he will not help his own flesh and blood.

Read from Gateway Pundit:

Barack Obama: “The Precepts of Jesus Christ Spoke to Me”

"Barack Obama told supporters today: 'The precepts of Jesus Christ spoke to me.'

…Which still does not explain why he chose Jeremiah Wright as his mentor and pastor for 20 years.




Barack Obama spoke about his faith today during a stop at a backyard bbq in New Mexico.
The New York Daily News reported:


'The idea of putting a mosque near Ground Zero may not be popular, but President Obama got a thank you for supporting the right to build it.

It came from a woman at Obama’s backyard meeting in New Mexico, after she asked why he is a Christian.

With a substantial percentage of the country doubting his religious faith, Obama probably welcomed the question, and answered: “I came to my Christian faith later in life and it was because the precepts of Jesus Christ spoke to me in terms of the kind of life that I would want to lead — being my brothers’ and sisters’ keeper, treating others as they would treat me.”

He noted that his mother may have been spiritual, but she was not a churchgoer.

But he prays every day, he said, so he can “see God in other people and do our best to help them find their own grace.”

And that applies to everyone, even though “this is a country that is still predominantly Christian,” Obama said.

“We have Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, agnostics, Buddhists, and that their own path to grace is one that we have to revere and respect as much as our own. And that’s part of what makes this country what it is,” Obama said.

It was that last part that prompted the thank you about the mosque.

“I’m a Christian, but we base our faith on free will,” the woman said. “And that’s what we were founded on, was freedom. And I just — I just thank you for taking a stand.”'"


"A country that is still predominantly Christian." Thank you, Mr. President, for admitting this fact.

Hamas Operative Tours Top-Secret Govt Facilities

Unbelievable! Sometimes we are our own worst enemy. Keep it up, Mr. President, and you will be absorbing the next terror attack sooner than you think.

Read from Big Peace:

FBI Escorts Known Hamas Operative Through Top-Secret National Counterterrorism Center as “Outreach” to Muslim Community


"Sheikh Kifah Mustapha (third from left) touring the National Counterterrorism Center (Photo: FBI)

"A known Hamas operative and unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history – Kifah Mustapha – was recently escorted into the top-secret National Counterterrorism Center and other secure government facilities, including the FBI’s training center at Quantico, during a six-week 'Citizen’s Academy' hosted by the FBI as part of its 'outreach' to the Muslim Community. The group was accompanied by reporter Ben Bradley of WLS-Chicago (ABC), who filed a report on the trip to Washington D.C. on Sunday, who observed:


'Sheik Kifah Mustapha, who runs the Mosque Foundation in Bridgeview, asked some of the most pointed questions during the six week FBI Citizens’ Academy and trip to Washington. He pushed agents to fully explain everything from the bureau’s use of deadly force policy to racial and ethnic profiling. “I saw a very interesting side of what the FBI does and I wanted to know more,” Sheik Mustapha explained after returning from D.C. He hopes the FBI’s outreach runs deeper than positive public relations.'


Yes, I bet he wanted to know everything about the FBI’s policies.

Curiously, Bradley’s report on the Citizen’s Academy fails to make note Mustapha’s extensive terrorist ties and support for Hamas, including his former employment with the Holy Land Foundation, which was listed as a specially designated terrorist group by the U.S. government in December 2001, and whose executives were convicted of terrorism support in 2008 and sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Mustapha was personally named unindicted co-conspirator (#31) in the case and employment records submitted by federal prosecutors during the trial showed that he received more than $154,000 for his work for the Holy Land Foundation between 1996 and 2000. During the trial, FBI Special Agent Lara Burns testified that Mustapha also sang in a band sponsored by the Holy Land Foundation that regularly featured songs dedicated to killing Jews and glorifying Hamas. In a deposition he gave in a civil trial concerned with the murder of a Chicago teenager killed by Hamas while waiting for a bus in Israel, Mustapha admitted that he was the registered agent for the Holy Land Foundation in Illinois, and also to his involvement with other Hamas front groups, including the Islamic Association for Palestine. He was later hired as an imam by the Mosque Foundation in Bridgeview, which the Chicago Tribune reported in 2004 has long been a hotbed of Hamas support.

Bradley’s omission of this information about Kifah Mustapha in his report on Sunday is all the more curious since his own station aired an extensive investigative report of Mustapha’s terrorist ties earlier this year.

The WLS investigation into Mustapha’s terrorist ties was prompted by a report published by the Investigative Project on Terrorism in January, which noted that Mustapha had been selected and trained as a chaplain by the Illinois State Police despite his documented terrorist support. The State Police eventually withdrew Mustapha’s appointment as chaplain and just last month he filed a lawsuit against the agency claiming discrimination aided by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, another FBI-identified Hamas front group.

There are several obvious problems with this episode, the first being the FBI’s 'outreach' to a known Hamas operative (identified as such by federal prosecutors) and walking him through some of our country’s most sensitive counter-terrorism facilities. Why should terrorist operatives have to covertly case potential targets when the FBI will happily escort them and taken them into areas they would never be able to reach on their own? Who’s next on the FBI’s 'outreach' calendar, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow GITMO detainees?

This ongoing 'outreach' to terror-linked individuals and leaders of known terrorist front groups by senior leaders of our national security, homeland security and law enforcement agencies is the kind of behavior criticized by my colleagues and I in the Team B II’s report released earlier this month, 'Shariah: The Threat to America'. As I observed last week here at Big Peace, Matt Duss of the Center for America Progress and ThinkProgress.org demands that we continue this insane national policy of embracing the same individuals and organizations who have been caught openly cheerleading for Islamic terrorists and have called for the destruction of the U.S. and Western Civilization.

The other glaring problem is that a reporter working in one of the largest media markets in the country can travel to such an event and be unaware of or unwilling to mention his own station’s reporting on his travel partner’s terrorist support activities. Such is the state of the establishment media today."

What a Bunch of Hypocrites!

Intolerance for me, but not for thee. So say representatives from the Islamic world.

From Weasel Zippers:

OIC Breaks Out The Big Guns: Leaders of Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, Malaysia, Maldives All Appear Before U.N. Urging Crackdown on “Islamophobia”…

"And yet every one of these countries mercilessly persecutes their Christian citizens (it’s even illegal in the Maldives to simply practice Christianity while churches are forbidden in Qatar), but we’re supposed to flush out cherished freedom of speech down the toilet so their feelings aren’t hurt?


(AFP)- 'KINGS, emirs and presidents from Muslim nations have appealed at the UN for the West to clamp down on attacks on Islam, which they warned were a growing threat to international security.

In speeches to the United Nations General Assembly, leaders said “Islamophobia” was causing a growing Muslim-West divide and one top Arab minister put the international community on guard against a “civilisation clash”.

…Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the emir of Qatar, who has launched western-backed diplomatic initiatives to settle wars ranging from Sudan to the Israel-Palestian conflict, condemned attempts to link Islam with terrorism. He partly blamed the US “war on terror” declared after September 11.

“We disagree with the attribution of this so-called terrorism to the Islamic religion because this — in addition to being incorrect — is a historical injustice that is refuted by evidence from recent history.”

Egypt’s Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit condemned “regrettable and appalling incidents that have increasingly touched Muslims and Islam, repeatedly and sometimes systematically in certain cases.”

He added: “We find the West, in general, being drawn into a clash with the Muslim world. This clash will serve no one except extremists and those who hold perverted ideas on both sides. It will not be in the interest of security and stability in the world.”

Gheit called for western governments to take action, including passing laws.

“We call upon all countries and especially governments, to assume their responsibility to confront the specter of a dreadful religious and civilisation clash.”

King Abdullah II of Jordan said it is “essential to resist forces of division that spread misunderstanding.” He called for an annual World Interfaith Harmony Week to promote tolerance.

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Najib Razak told the UN assembly that the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims were offended by “attempts to demonise Islam.”'


Rest here>>>"

Bob “Who are you?” Etheridge

Spectacular ad, via Red State:

Black Tea Party Supporters

Hey libs, if the Tea Party is nothing more than a bunch of racists, how do you explain a significant amount of support for the movement from blacks? Yes, you read that right--blacks. If this is the case, say good-bye to the racist label.

Read from Gateway Pundit:

Racists!… One-Third of Blacks Support Tea Party

"They must be racists…

A new poll released by Pajamas TV claims that one-third of black voters support the tea party movement.
WND reported:


'A new poll released this week soundly contradicts critics’ claims that the tea-party movement is “fringe,” “white” and “racist.”

PJTV’s Tea Party Tracking Poll has monitored nationwide sentiments toward the tea party on a weekly basis since Aug. 2. The poll’s most recent reports reveal the following results:


The number of people who identify as 'members' of the tea party has more than tripled over the last month alone, up to 21 percent of likely voters;

Fifty-five percent of those surveyed said they support the tea parties based on the movement’s positions on the issues;

Among the likely voters who are black, 32 percent said they would vote for a candidate backed by the tea parties.'"

"The Party of Death" Strikes Again

When is enough enough? Liberal Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky wants the Hyde Amendment repealed.

Read from Weasel Zippers:

Dem Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky Calls For Repealing Ban on Federal Funding of Abortion, Wants More Poor Women to Kill Their Babies…



"The Party of Death…


(CNSNews.com) – 'Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding of abortion except in certain cases, should be repealed, and also said “there’s no evidence” that increasing access to abortion services encourages people to get abortions.

At an event on Capitol Hill sponsored by the Center for Reproductive Rights to call for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, CNSNews.com asked Rep. Schakowsky, “So, increasing access to abortion, you think, does not encourage some people to get abortions?”

Rep. Schakowsky said, “No, there’s no evidence of that around the world, where access to abortion is more available but somehow women are more inclined to get one.”

“What happens is that women who don’t have access resort, as we heard today, to very dangerous, self-inflicted kinds of things in order to end, terminate the pregnancy,” she said. “And so, you know, we go back to back alley abortions. We go back to coat hangers. And, I mean, is that what we want?”

…Terry Sallas Merritt, vice president of Whole Woman’s Health, said during the event on Capitol Hill that abortion is 10 times safer than childbirth.

CNSNews.com asked Rep. Schakowsky if she agreed with Merritt.

“I’m assuming that was on a scientific finding that the insistence of mortality or illness or whatever is an adverse health affect is much more common in childbirth,” the congresswoman said. “There are many more things that can go wrong than a first-trimester abortion, but, as was pointed out, in order for poor women to afford an abortion, it may take them a long time to get the money together. They’re put in a more precarious health situation, the risks increase as well as the cost.”

“We want to make sure this very safe, outpatient procedure is available and accessible to poor women,” said Rep. Schakowsky. “That is not to say that we don’t want to also increase the availability of family planning, of birth control, which again, there’s sometimes discrimination even in that.”'"


And for the best part of the article:


"According to Schakowsky and 99% of the Democratic party, this is not a child…"

FBI Investigates Andy Stern

Frequent White House visitor and union thug Andy Stern is being investigated by the FBI. Boy, Mr. President, you sure know how to pick 'em.

Read from Gateway Pundit:

FBI Investigating Obama Confidant and Union Chief Andy Stern?

"This is pretty momentous information. According to two people interviewed by federal agents the FBI and the U.S. Labor Dept. are investigating former Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Andy Stern.


'The two organized labor officials met with federal agents this summer to answer questions about a six-figure book contract that Stern landed in 2006 and his role in approving money to pay the salary of an SEIU leader in California who allegedly performed no work.'


It should be remembered that Andy Stern has been one of the most frequent visitors to the White House and has served as a close adviser to President Barack Obama.

Stern unexpectedly resigned in April as president of one of the most powerful unions in the nation. This news might explain why. He may have known that he was being investigated.

Accusations include questions over a $175,000 advance for a book deal that Stern pocketed.


'One person who spoke to federal agents twice, in May and June, said they asked about a 2006 contract in which Stern received a $175,000 advance from Simon & Schuster to write the book “A Country That Works.” The SEIU and its locals bought thousands of copies of the book after it was published. The union also paid thousands to fact-check and promote the book, but Stern pocketed the advance.'


In February Stern was appointed to Obama’s White House debt commission. Apparently Obama thinks that a guy that may have scammed hundreds of thousands of dollars really understands finances!

**UPDATE**

SEIU spokesman Ringuette flatly denies that former chief Andy Stern has 'been contacted' by the FBI. It should be noted that no news of the possible investigation into Andy Stern asserted that the FBI has contacted him directly."

Farrakhan and Ahmadinejad

How cozy! While Ahmadinejad graced our shores in NYC last week, he took time to visit with fellow Jew-hater Louis Farrakhan.

Hmmm, I wonder if they sneaked another Jew-hater into their meeting. Perhaps, Obama's mentor, Jeremiah Wright, or maybe his pal Rashid Khalidi, or could it be his buddy, Ali Abunimah? Wow! So many Jew-hating friends of Obama, it's difficult to know where to begin. Too bad Obama himself could not attend, but that wouldn't play well with his Jewish support, now would it?

Read from Gateway Pundit:



Ahmadinejad Met With Farrakhan in New York City

"Iranian Regime President secretly met with anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan in New York City this past week.
My FOX Houston reported:


'Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s six-night visit to NYC included a secret sit-down with militant minister Louis Farrakhan, the New York Post reported Sunday.

The president shared a hush-hush meal with Farrakhan and members of the New Black Panther Party Tuesday at the Warwick Hotel on West 54th Street.

The meeting took place during Ahmadinejad’s stay in NYC to address the U.N. General Assembly. He met Farrakhan, the fiery 77-year-old leader of The Nation of Islam, in the Warwick Hotel’s banquet hall.

Ahmadinejad’s speech Thursday, during which speculated that the U.S. was behind the 9/11 terror attacks caused outrage, caused a walk-out by U.S. delegates.

The speech was just part of the Iranian leader’s bizarre six-night NYC visit.'"

The Most Dangerous Man in America

President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, the most dangerous man in America according to Glenn Beck, has no respect for the U.S. Constitution as written by James Madison. Sunstein is a man after Obama's own heart.

Listen to him in his own words complain because Justices Scalia and Thomas believe the "Constitution should mean what it originally meant".

From The Blaze:

"Some conservative legal thinkers like Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas think that the Constitution means what it originally meant. That means we should understand the document by going into a kind of ‘Time Machine’ and capturing the public understanding of the public that ratified the document a century or more than a century ago.”

Only 38% Want Obama Re-Elected

The smooth tongue and charismatic personality are no longer effective. Reality has set in. Americans aren't interested in the "hope and change" offered by President Obama. They prefer jobs, a home which is not being foreclosed upon, and food on their tables. We can't have these three and Obama, too.

With numbers as pathetic as Obama's, it's time for the libs to bring out the big guns: voter fraud and amnesty for illegals or their guy will do a repeat performance of Jimmy Carter.

Read from Hot Air:

Poll shows Obama re-elect number at 38%

"A new poll from Politico has bad news for the White House as Barack Obama prepares for the grueling task of re-election. Despite a long history of American voters choosing to re-elect its Chief Executive, Obama only gets 38% of likely voters to agree that he deserves re-election, while 44% say they will definitely vote against him — and another 13% say they’re considering doing the same:


'A significant majority of voters are considering voting against President Barack Obama in the 2012 election, expressing sour views of his new health care law and deep skepticism about his ability to create jobs and grow the sluggish economy, according to the latest POLITICO / George Washington University Battleground Poll.

Only 38 percent of respondents said Obama deserves to be reelected, even though a majority of voters hold a favorable view of him on a personal level. Forty-four percent said they will vote to oust him, and 13 percent said they will consider voting for someone else.'


What’s the problem? ObamaCare and a lack of job creation have completely undermined Obama’s image as a moderate, pragmatic President:


'It’s Obama’s policies that are hurting him right now. By a 13-point margin, voters are down on the health care law. In an especially troubling sign, more than half of self-identified independents — 54 percent — have an unfavorable opinion of the law, compared with just 38 percent who have a favorable opinion.

And by an 11-point margin, voters trust congressional Republicans to create jobs more than Obama. His approval rating stands at 46 percent, according to the poll of 1,000 likely voters, conducted Sept. 19 to Sept. 22.'"


Read it all.

Media Mum on the Burning of Bibles

Where's the hysteria? Oh, that's right. Nobody cares when Bibles are burnt because there are no savage Christians out there ready to respond with violence.

Once again, this story takes place in Pakistan. Read from Weasel Zippers:

Pakistan: Muslims Attack Church, Set Fire to Stack of Bibles…

"And yet the world freaks out when a tiny Church in Florida simply threatens to burn the Koran but when it really happens to Christians there isn’t so much as a peep…


(Continental News)- 'Another shocking attack against Pakistani Christians has taken place, this time by a group of unidentified Muslim men who attacked the Nasri Pentecostal Church in Shah Latif Town, Karachi.

The unprovoked violence took place at around midnight on Saturday, September 18, 2010, when a group of men cut the locks of the church and then, once inside, went on an orgy of violence.

They piled up Bibles, hymnals (including Books of the Psalms), and musical instruments and then set them on fire and fled the scene of their crime.

The ASSIST News Service was told about the appalling desecration at the Pentecostal church by the Rev. Khadim Bhutto, a clergyman who works with the Gospel Vision Church Ministries (GVCM) and an activist with the Gawahi Mission Trust (GMT), a Christian human rights advocacy group.

The Rev. Bhutto told ANS that that “erupting smoke and the light of the fire had attracted the attention of several Christian men” who were nearby and they “rushed into the church and were able to save several more items from being completely destroyed in the blaze.”

On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, a Christian rights defender group, the Human Rights Development Commission (HRDC), under the leadership of its Chairman William Sadiq, staged a protest rally against the torching of the church.

Sadiq said that he “condemned the attack by the Muslim suspects” saying that “if the reverse had occurred, and Christians had attacked a Mosque, the repercussions could have been terrible and extremely violent.”

Commenting on the possible motive for the attack, Sadiq said that “it might have been a reaction to the Rev. Terry Jones’ threat to burn copies of the Koran (Qur’an), viewed as holy by all Muslims, on 9/11, at his church in Gainesville, Florida.'"

Mourning In America

From Red State:

Where's the Peace?

John T. Bennett at the American Thinker exposes the myth of islam as a "religion of peace".

Shouting 'Fire' in a Crowded Globe
By John T. Bennett

"Can we stop calling Islam a religion of peace now? The fairy tale has been tarnished by Islamic violence, and it's undignified for children of the Enlightenment to go on repeating falsehoods.

If Islam were a religion of peace, no one would be worried about violence resulting from the burning of Korans. If Islam were a religion of peace, then a Supreme Court justice would not have compared burning a Koran to shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater.

The liberal Rhodes Scholar George Stephanopoulos recently reported that 'Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer told me on ['Good Morning America'] that he's not prepared to conclude that -- in the internet age -- the First Amendment condones Koran-burning. ... For Breyer, that right is not a foregone conclusion.'

In discussing Koran-burning, Justice Breyer said of free speech, 'Holmes said it doesn't mean you can shout "fire" in a crowded theater.' Not only did the Justice misquote Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' famous crowded theater quote, but he did so in a way that indicates his willingness to weaken the First Amendment in favor of appeasing radical Islam.

Actually, Holmes wrote that 'falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater' cannot be protected. The key word 'falsely,' left out by Breyer, gave the phrase its legal significance. If you truthfully shout 'fire' in a crowded theater, then that is dangerous but truthful, so it's protected by the First Amendment. If you falsely shout 'fire,' then that is dangerous and not protected. This is a very telling omission. If Breyer means what he says, then he is willing to give free-speech veto power to irrational and violent groups, regardless of whether one is criticizing -- or shouting 'fire' -- falsely or truthfully. To give that power to radical Muslims would be a craven surrender of our rights and interest in open debate and criticism. It would also be an awful reflection on the hypersensitivity and inherently violent nature of modern Islam.

J. Breyer's botched invocation of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's crowded theater phrase shows that he is just as careless about free speech on this issue as Holmes was. That quote comes from Schenck v. U.S., a 1919 case where Holmes agreed that a man could be criminally convicted for handing out leaflets opposing the WWI draft. Holmes' ruling was awful; he dramatically changed his thinking later the same year, and Schenck was further altered in favor of free speech by Brandenburg v. Ohio. Breyer used a wretched example that stands for the proposition that speech can be curbed if there will be an irrational reaction to it.

As a matter of free speech, J. Breyer's remarks were sinister. As a reflection on Islamic violence and intolerance, Breyer's comments were even more disturbing -- but also a bit humorous. We just assume, correctly, that Muslims will explode upon slight provocations that would be ignored by every other religion. Yet we go on repeating the religion of peace mantra. We even make concessions -- to include entertaining limits on our rights. One has to find amusement in such a neurotic and dishonest outlook. Only Islam benefits from such low standards.

Burning a Buddhist sutra would be like yelling 'fire' when you are alone in a theater; no Buddhist would kill and riot over the burning. Burning a Bible would be like passing gas in crowded theater; it would earn you contempt and not much more. But burning a Koran -- that's more like yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater. We simply take for granted that a significant number of the faithful will erupt in violence -- as they did in Afghanistan and Iran at the mention of burning a book across the ocean.

Members of the ruling class like J. Breyer endanger and shame us all by accommodating the growing demands of radical Islam: Disney and Abercrombie and Fitch are being sued because they won't let Muslim women wear their medieval headgear at work, where it doesn't belong. The state of New Jersey fired a transit worker for burning a Koran while off-duty. An American cartoonist for the Seattle Weekly named Molly Norris has changed her identity to avoid Muslim death threats. On top of that, we have a president whose only response to Islamic violence is to lecture non-Muslims about bigotry.

As a note on sensitivity, I use the phrase 'Islamic violence' in the same sense that people talk about 'male violence.' Referring to 'male violence' is not to say that all men are violent. People should be capable of making the same distinction with the phrase 'Islamic violence'. No reasonable person would take the phrase 'Islamic violence' to mean that all Muslims are violent.

Our president -- in a twisted inversion of values and interests -- is lecturing us when he should be lecturing the Muslim world. Unfortunately, he appears to have at least one Supreme Court justice who shares his supine and suicidal wish for therapeutic global acceptance."

Welcome to Obamaville

Obama and his liberal comrades in Congress had no rest until they passed the $30 billion small business loan bill. That may sound all well and good like the regime is focused on getting the economy going again.

But, the dirty little secret is that small businessmen are not looking for loans. They are too terrified by the president's threats of income tax hikes, mandated health insurance, increased energy prices, and all the nasty added regulation coming from the White House. With such a depressing scenario and such a crappy economy, who in their right mind wants to take on added debt?

Read from Weasel Zippers:

Another Fail? Obama’s Small Biz Lending Program – Nobody Wants Any Part Of It.

"We don’t want your stinkin’ loans.

Recent survey shows that 91% of small business owners say all their credit needs are being met. They need customers!


(My Way) — 'President Barack Obama’s $30 billion small community business lending program faces one big challenge: many of the community banks and businesses it’s supposed to help don’t want it.

The lending program is part of a bill that passed the House of Representatives on Thursday and now awaits the president’s signature. The legislation contains a mix of tax cuts and credits aimed at helping small businesses. The centerpiece of the bill is an effort to make billions of dollars available to community banks for loans to small businesses. It seems like a simple effort to unclog a credit pipeline that has been blocked since the financial meltdown two years ago. But interviews with seven community bankers, as well as small business owners, show a reluctance to participate.

“People in my constituency can’t get credit, and this will get money out to small businesses, who are the engine of job creation for this country,” said Republican Sen. George LeMieux of Florida, who co-authored the amendment that created the lending program.

Bank executives say their customers don’t want loans, even at low interest rates, because the sluggish economy has chilled expansion plans. Some say the federal money isn’t worth it because they fear it will come with too much regulatory oversight.

“We have taken a strategic decision not to have our primary regulator, the government, also be a partner in our bank,” said William Chase Jr., CEO of Triumph Bank in Memphis.'


Read the rest here."


Oh well, if they don't want Obama's loans, he can add the money to his Democratic slush fund.

SEIU and Voter Fraud

Diogenes, your friends on the Left are at it again, doing what they do best--participating in voter fraud.

From Gateway Pundit:

Texas SEIU Member Registers 23,207 Fraudulent Voters

"Service Employees International Union (SEIU) member Steve Caddle of Houston, Texas has been caught registering 23,207 fake voters in Harris County alone due to the hard detective work of Catherine Engelbrecht and her 'True the Vote' project.

This is one of the best examples of what good citizen activism inspired by Tea Party principles can do for their community.

Catherine Engelbrecht was sick and tired of the vote fraud perpetrated by unions and Democrats and set out to expose it herself. Along with many friends who donated their time, computers, and sweat, they’ve uncovered thousands upon thousands of illegal Democrat 'voters' in Texas.


'“The integrity of the voting rolls in Harris County, Texas, appears to be under an organized and systematic attack by the group operating under the name Houston Votes,” the Harris voter registrar, Leo Vasquez, charged as he passed on the documentation to the district attorney. A spokesman for the DA’s office declined to discuss the case. And a spokesman for Vasquez said that the DA has asked them to refrain from commenting on the case.'


The union thug behind this particular criminal enterprise admitted only that there 'had been mistakes made.' Yeah, like not worrying about icebergs was just a 'mistake' made by the Titanic’s crew! Of the 25,000 voter registrations turned in by Caddle only about 1,793 were legal.


'“Vacant lots had several voters registered on them. An eight-bed halfway house had more than 40 voters registered at its address,” Engelbrecht said. “We then decided to look at who was registering the voters.”

….The other registrations included one of a woman who registered six times in the same day; registrations of non-citizens; so many applications from one Houston Voters collector in one day that it was deemed to be beyond human capability; and 1,597 registrations that named the same person multiple times, often with different signatures.'


Does anyone have any doubt that this sort of crime has been perpetrated by Democrats the nation over? How many millions of fake, dead, nonexistent, and/or fraudulent voters have Democrats foisted upon the voter rolls in every corner of the nation?

Well, due to the excellent work of Catherine Engelbrecht we see exposed at least some of the criminal behavior of Texas Democrats and Union thugs.

So what was the outcome of Engelbrecht’s hard work? All of Harris County’s voting machines were torched in a three-alarm fire by person or persons unknown. Bet those shadowy firebugs hold SEIU membership cards, too!

Great work, Catherine. Now let’s see this replicated in every city in the nation.

Prairie Pundit has more on the latest SEIU scandal."

Texas Takes Action Against Islamic Agenda in Schools

FINALLY! Someone is taking a stand against the political correctness of promoting islam in our public schools. Why should the muslim religion be promoted any more than other religions? We, as Americans, have had it with liberal indoctrination of our children with taxpayer funds.

Keep in mind that there is a strong bond between the far Left and the islamic religion because they both share a hatred for the God of the Bible and this nation.

From Jihad Watch:

Texas Board of Education passes resolution challenging pro-Islamic bias in textbooks

"What is often lost in this discussion is the idea that the Board has the right and duty to exercise quality control over the content of its textbooks, and it would be reasonable for any such body to be concerned about bias, double standards, and agenda-driven statements in those books. The problem that responsibility is encountering here is Islam's already privileged status, where anything but accolades is to be met with knee-jerk accusations of the worst possible intentions, so as to shut down the discussion and silence dissent.

An update on this story. 'Texas ed board adopts resolution limiting Islam,' from the Associated Press, September 24:


AUSTIN, Texas -- 'The Texas State Board of Education adopted a resolution Friday that seeks to curtail references to Islam in Texas textbooks, as social conservative board members warned of what they describe as a creeping Middle Eastern influence in the nation's publishing industry.

The board approved the one-page nonbinding resolution, which urges textbook publishers to limit what they print about Islam in world history books, by a 7-5 vote.

Critics say it's another example of the ideological board trying to politicize public education in the Lone Star State. Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, which advocates for religious freedom, questioned why the resolution came at a time when "anti-Muslim rhetoric in this country has reached fever pitch."'


From that, you'd think those of us who criticize Islam's teachings were rampaging in the streets, setting fire to piles of tires, hurling stones at government buildings, and calling for bloodshed.

Not us. But that's precisely what has happened in Afghanistan over a Qur'an burning that never happened, and even the rumor of burnings.


'"It's hard not to conclude that the misleading claims in this resolution are either based on ignorance of what's in the textbooks or, on the other hand, are an example of fear-mongering and playing politics," Miller said.

Future boards that will choose the state's next generation of social studies texts will not be bound by the resolution.

"This is an expression of the board's opinion, so it does not have an affect on any particular textbook," said David Anderson, the general counsel for the Texas Education Agency, when asked by a board member what legal weight the resolution would carry.

"So this is a cosmetic exercise?" asked board member Mavis Knight, a Democrat from Dallas.

The resolution cites world history books no longer used in Texas schools that it says devoted more lines of text to Islamic beliefs and practices than Christian ones. Chairwoman Gail Lowe said the resolution cites old books because board rules prohibit them from discussing current books more than 90 days after their adoption.

"I believe that it's happening in the current (social studies books) even though we can't cover that in the resolution," said board member Terri Leo, a Republican from Spring. The resolution sends a "clear message to publishers that it should not happen in the future."

The resolution also claims "more such discriminatory treatment of religion may occur as Middle Easterners buy into the U.S. public school textbook oligopoly, as they are doing now." [...]

The resolution concludes by warning publishers the "State Board of Education will look to reject future prejudicial social studies submissions that continue to offend Texas law with respect to treatment of the world's major religious groups by significant inequalities of coverage space-wise and by demonizing or lionizing one or more of them over others."'


Eminently reasonable concerns."

In the Name of Islam

How anyone with a soul can defend this religion is beyond me.

Because I am a Christian, I would love to see people come to Christ, but I wouldn't even consider attempting to force someone to convert to my faith. What kind of god would want a follower who did not come willingly? The God of the Bible is all about free choice; apparently, allah is not.

As is often the case, what you are about to read from Atlas Shrugs took place in Pakistan--the land where killing Christians is a sport.

Pakistan: Muslims burn Christian Man for Refusing to Convert to Islam as Policeman Rapes his Wife

"Unspeakable horror. Islamic supremacism.

Pakistan: Muslims burn Christian man as policeman rapes his wife NowPublic, March 2010

Washington, D.C. (March 23, 2010)– 'Travesty of justice does not fit the description of the events. This is simple barbarism.

International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that a Christian man, Arshed Masih, died yesterday after Muslims burned him alive for refusing to recant his faith. Additionally, a Muslim policeman raped Masih’s wife.

Masih and his wife, Martha, worked and lived at the house of Sheik Mohammad Sultan, a powerful Muslim businessman in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, since 2005.

Pakistan's most powerful man, army chef General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani is from the Rawalpindi area and is visiting the U.S. capitol.

In January, Muslim religious leaders and Sheik Sultan asked Masih and his family to convert to Islam. Masih and his family refused to convert and informed Sheik Sultan that they were going to quit working for him. The Sheik became furious and warned Masih that he would kill him if he quit. Masih told his family and friends about the entire incident. Christian leaders tried to persuade the Sheik to let Masih and his family leave his house.

On March 14, Sheik Sultan`s house was robbed. He filed a case of theft of 500,000 Rupees ($ 5,952) against Martha. After taking them for questioning, the police assaulted Masih and raped Martha. Two days later, Sheik Sultan told the couple that he would ask the police to release them if they converted to Islam. The couple refused to recant their faith.

On March 19, Masih was set on fire in front of the police station. At the time, three Muslim religious leaders and three policemen were present at the scene. The perpetrators have not been identified.

Masih was taken to the Holy Family Hospital where he received treatment for three days before finally dying today.

Masih’s children Mary, 12, Nasir, 10, and Neha, 7, are deeply traumatized after witnessing acts of brutality against their family at the hands of Muslims.'"


If that didn't make your blood boil, perhaps this will. But, beware; it's painful to watch.

From Jihad Watch:

Video surfaces of Taliban stoning woman in northwest Pakistan



WARNING: The video above is graphic, and beyond disturbing. It is footage of a woman dying under a barrage of stones. But it must be exposed:

This is Sharia. This is an act Muhammad approved of and participated in, according to canonical Islamic sources including Sahih ('sound,' 'reliable') Bukhari.

This is Islam's 'justice,' 'compassion,' and 'mercy' which apologists will not repudiate, attempting to dodge the issue by assuring the uninformed (and maybe even trying to make themselves believe) that it is not an issue because it is not prescribed in the Qur'an itself. Click here for why that does not make a difference to the Muslims who have continued the practice over the centuries.

And what was this woman's crime? Here is the back story. 'Rare Video Shows Taliban Allegedly Stoning Woman to Death in Pakistan,' by Megan Chuchmach for ABC News, September 24:


'A rare video reportedly smuggled out of northwest Pakistan allegedly shows a woman being stoned to death by Taliban militants in the upper region of Orakzai.

Al Aan, a Dubai-based pan-Arab television channel that focuses on women's issues, said it had obtained cellphone footage that it says shows a woman being executed because she was seen out with a man. The killing reportedly took place two months ago and was smuggled out by a Taliban member who attended the stoning, according to Al Aan. ABC News could not independently confirm the cellphone video's authenticity.

The video, which seems to show a woman tethered to the ground as a group of men throw stones at her, is so graphic that ABC News cannot show it in its entirety. Parts of it air today on the 25th episode of "Brian Ross Investigates."

"It's difficult to know where and when it was shot," says Gayle Lemmon, deputy director of the Women and Foreign Policy Program at the Council of Foreign Relations, in an interview with Ross, "It is consistent with videos that have been coming from Taliban-controlled areas since the '90s."

Lemmon says that when women "stray outside the line" in Taliban-controlled areas, they may "face severe punishment."

"Women are respected as carriers of the family honor," says Lemmon, "but they also pay the price."...'


What a great system: be 'honored' or be killed!

The ABC link has its own video, including a mostly dismal interview with Lemmon, who hedges on whether this has anything to do with Islam.

But we know better."

42% Favorability

Just lovin' this. Our president's approval ratings are in the toilet. Poor Barry!

Americans are no longer in worship mode. The "hope and change" message has proven to be a complete fraud, and poll numbers reflect this. A mere 42% approve of the president's job running this country, and this is a CNN poll--CNN, one of the many lapdog media outlets. What do you wanna bet they oversampled Democrats in their poll? If that is the case, Obama's numbers could possibly be in the 30s.

Read from Weasel Zippers:

CNN Poll: Obama’s Approval Rating at All Time Low, 42%, Majority Say They’re More Likely to Vote For a Candidate He Opposes Over One He Supports…

"Wow, talk about great timing, earlier today Pelosi said Dem candidates are 'clamoring' for Obama to campaign for them in their districts…


(CNN) –'President Barack Obama is contending with the lowest approval rating of his 20-month presidency, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll finds.

The president’s approval rating now stands at 42 percent – an all time low in CNN polling and 8 points lower than where Obama was only three weeks ago. Moreover, 56 percent of all Americans think the president has fallen short of their expectations.

The president’s sagging poll numbers couldn’t come at a worse time for congressional Democrats, themselves facing a nine-point deficit in the so-called “generic ballot” question heading into the midterm elections. In fact, the president’s approval rating is the same as that of President Clinton’s in 1994 – the midterm election year that saw Republicans wrest control of both the House and Senate.

In even worse news for congressional Democrats, likely voters say they are considerably more likely to vote for a candidate the president opposes than one he supports. On the other hand, 50 percent of voters said they would be more likely to vote for a Tea Party-backed candidate while a third of Americans said Tea Party support would dissuade their vote for a candidate.'"

Racism in the White House

The American Pravda is right on when they say there is racism in America. However, it's not the Tea Party movement that is guilty. It's the Obama regime, and the key player is Eric Holder.



Try to imagine David Duke intimidating black voters during a presidential election, and watch the sparks fly, as they rightly should. Nobody should be afraid to cast his vote on Election Day in the U.S. But, in an Obama regime, the rules don't apply for black people.

Hey, Janeane, this is racism straight up.

Rejoice because the truth is being exposed.

Read from the American Thinker:

Devastating Black Panther voter intimidation testimony today (updated)
Thomas Lifson

"Christopher Coates, former voting chief for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, has given powerful testimony this morning, under oath, about the dismissal of charges against members of the New Black Panther Party who carried truncheons at a polling place in Philadelphia. Fox News reports:


'Coates went in depth about a controversial decision to dismiss charges against New Black Panther members after they were videotaped outside a Philadelphia polling place in 2008 dressed in military-style uniforms and allegedly hurling racial slurs while one brandished a night stick.

The case has drifted in and out of the limelight over the past year as the commission has struggled to investigate it. Ex-Justice official J. Christian Adams fueled the controversy when he testified in July and accused his former employer of showing "hostility" toward cases that involve white victims and black defendants.

Nearly three months later, Coates backed up Adams' claims. In lengthy and detailed testimony, he said the department cultivates a "hostile atmosphere" against "race-neutral enforcement" of the Voting Rights Act. [...]

He said civil rights attorneys stick to cases that involve minority victims and that the Black Panther case was dismissed following "pressure" by the NAACP and "anger" at the case within the Justice Department itself.

"That anger was the result of their deep-seated opposition to the equal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act against racial minorities and for the protection of white voters who have been discriminated against," he said.'


This outrageous behavior by the top law enforcement agency of the United States, denying equal protection of the law to white voters, has the potential to seriously damage AG Eric Holder, and the man who appointed him, Barack Obama, and the entire Democratic Party. The DoJ's inspector General is already investigating, and and if Republicans control, the House of Representatives next year, we can expect serious investigation armed with subpoena power.

Zoe Lofgren's contemptible summoning of satirist Steven Colbert to testify before her committee -- only to have the comedian be asked to leave by the more level-headed John Conyers -- may well have been a diversionary effort, to suck away the media spotlight. It no doubt will succeed in helping the liberal media to ignore the explosive Coates testimony, but the liberal media no longer have the power to deep six stories that embarrass their Democrat allies.


The Obama Justice Department is doing its best to create the impression among the white majority that it regards them as second class citizens. As further details emerge, the damage to Obama and the Democrats will grow worse, I predict.

Update:

Andrew Breitbart points out that in July 2009, just as Republicans were beginning to raise questions about the DoJ dropping the case, someone named Malik Shabazz -- the same name as the leader of the New Black Panthers in this case -- visited the White House, as revealed by White House logs made public. However, oficials deny that it is the same man. However, they will not identify the other man purportedly carrying the same name.

Breitbart - and soon Republicans -- deamnds that the White House identify the other Shabazz, if he indeed exists. If it turns out that the defendant actually visited the White House, this becomes even more serious a scandal, raising the possiblity of presidential interference (obstruction?) in a prosecution.


'The idea that an individual named Malik Shabazz had a private meeting in the White House residence in July 2009 is highly relevant because throughout July, Congressmen Frank Wolf (R-VA) and Lamar Smith (R-TX) were beginning to ask questions about to the dropped charges against the NBPP. So was the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Here is a timeline, according to Adams:


•July 8, Representative Frank Wolf sent a letter to Judiciary Chairman John Conyers and Ranking Member Lamar Smith demanding hearings before the House Judiciary Committee.
•July 9, Ten members of the House sent a letter demanding the DOJ Inspector General open an investigation.
•July 13, The Dept. of Justice replied but their letter contained factual inaccuracies about the case
•July 17 Smith and Wolf send a swift and pointed rebuttal
•July 20, Low-level DOJ staffers were sent to the Hill to brief Wolf on the Panther story, but Wolf threw them out of his office claiming they weren't being truthful to him.
•July 22, Wolf sent another letter to Attorney General Eric Holder demanding answers.
•July 24, Portia Robinson, intergovernmental liaison at DOJ, sent a letter to the Civil Rights Commission trying to deflect attention.
•July 25, a man named Malik Shabazz visited the exclusive, private residence in the White House.
•July 30, the Washington Times broke the news that top political appointee, Tom Perrelli (the #3 official at Justice) was involved in the dismissal of the case. Perrelli was also a top campaign bundler for Obama.


The White House has assured the American people that the Malik Shabazz that visited the White House at that time is not the same Malik Shabazz at the center of the New Black Panther story. But, the White House has not provided any information to verify its contention or who this "other" Malik Shabazz is.'"

Good News from Florida

Praise the Lord! It's looking more and more like Lt. Col. Allen West will indeed be the next congressman from Florida's 22nd district.

Read from Gateway Pundit:

ALLEN WEST Takes Lead Over Lib Dem Klein in US House Race

"More good news for conservatives…

Conservative Allen West took the lead over liberal Ron Klein in the latest Wilson Strategies survey.


'Republican 22nd Congressional Candidate Allen West leads Incumbent Ron Klein 48% – 42% in a survey conducted by Wilson Research Strategies on September 20-22, 2010.

“While we are encouraged by our latest poll results, our campaign to restore honor, integrity and character to Washington is just getting started,” said LTC(R) Allen West. He continued, “I will continue to press on, and take our message of smaller government, constitutional values and principled leadership directly to the citizens of the 22nd Congressional District. The only poll that matters is the one that will come out on the evening of November 2nd.”

West has increased his Name ID to 82% throughout the Congressional district and has a favorable to unfavorable rating of 39% to 27%. Ron Klein now has a 1-1 favorable to unfavorable ratio, with 41% viewing him favorably and 38% unfavorably.

Among Independents – a key group crucial to victory in November – LTC(R) West holds a 52% to 36% lead.

Nearly two-thirds of the Congressional District (63%) believe that our country is heading in the wrong direction, and Republicans lead 47% to 34% on the generic ballot.

“With nearly 13% unemployment and the 3rd highest foreclosure rate in the country, South Floridians are sick and tired of politics as usual,” said Allen West for Congress Campaign Manager, Josh Grodin. “Klein has decided to engage in character assassination instead of talking about the issues that are affecting every American family. Clearly, this is not working.”'


You can help Allen West defeat this lib by donating to his campaign here.
This military man could use your support."

The Marxist Regime's Greatest Hits

From Glenn Beck:

Watch Out, Libs! November Is Coming!

From Red State:

The Uncaring President

President Obama could care less about the American people. When it comes down to the nitty gritty, it's always about him. Even when it comes to our national security, the man is cold and indifferent to our safety.

So, Mr. President, how can you possibly say that America can absorb a terrorist attack? With a comment like that, as reported in Bob Woodward's new book "Obama's Wars", the public should be deeply concerned.

I had my problems with Bush, but at least national security was a priority for him, which it obviously is not for Obama. Oh, he cares some, but only because it would make him look bad.

From Weasel Zippers:

Bolton: “Obama is simply not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief”

"As the UN Ambassador who kept us out of the ICC during the Bush Administration, John Bolton IS the anti-thesis to the multilateral- loving, globalist Obama.




'“If the book is accurate … it is some of the most cold-blooded, cynical, grotesquely political manipulation of national security that I think we’ve ever seen.”

“The notion that a President would say that in that kind of callous and just utterly robotic way, I think is yet further indication that Obama is simply not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief,” Bolton added.

“Obama is divorced from the American people, I think he is unemphatic, I think he is ’show that’ and I think the American people have the wit to know what that means,” Bolton concluded.'"

What They Refuse to Tell Us

Those who want no part of God like us to believe that there are no consequences for living a sinful lifestyle. But sadly, they are dead wrong. The sick part is that some of the consequences are intentionally hidden from the public, thereby endangering uninformed people.

Read from Life News:

Microbiologist: Hundreds of Studies Confirm Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
by Steven Ertelt

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- "A microbiologist says there are so many published studies confirming the link between induced abortion and breast cancer that he plans to publish one every day on his blog until he's mentioned them all. It will take Dr. Gerard Nadal so many weeks to cover them all, the blogging will continue until early next year.

Nadal, who has a has a PhD in Molecular Microbiology from St John's University in New York, has spent 16 years teaching science, most recently at Manhattan College.

He will report on one abortion-breast cancer study daily until he has exhausted all of the abortion-breast cancer studies and he anticipates he may be reporting on these studies as late as January or February of 2011.

'Today begins the inexorable presentation of the scientific literature on the abortion/breast cancer link,' Nadal writes. 'Women’s lives depend on us getting the truth out to them. In short order we'll generate plenty of pros armed with the simple truth of science!'

His first article reviews a 1997 epidemiological study by Julie Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg and their colleagues, 'Induced and spontaneous abortion in relation to breast cancer,' published in the journal, Cancer Causes and Control.

Palmer and Rosenberg are not unbiased researchers, which makes their findings even more relevant for women. Instead, they are abortion advocates who have testified as expert witnesses on behalf of abortion businesses in lawsuits challenging the states of Alaska and Florida because of their parental notice or consent laws.

Their study, supported by U.S. National Cancer Institute grants, examined 1,835 women ages 25-64 years with pathologically confirmed, invasive breast cancer and 4,289 women aged 25-64 admitted for nonmalignant or malignant conditions.

Nadal says the study found women who had never had children and who had one case of an induced abortion raised their abortion breast cancer risk by 40 percent.

'So in plain English, women who had one induced abortion, regardless of ever having had a child, had a 40% increased risk of developing breast cancer over women the same age, with the same parity status who never had abortions, and the authors are 95% certain that there is no other explanation,' he said.

Nadal says the study further showed that for women who had a child previously, 'there is a 30% increased risk of cancer' and it 'may well be explained by additional stimulation of the lobules by estrogen in the aborted pregnancy, without the benefit of lactogen at the end.'"


Read it all.


There are consequences to homosexuality as well. I'll bet the perverted Safe Scool Czar Kevin Jennings isn't bothering to share the following, via John McTernan with our impressionable public school youths whom he is attempting to indoctrinate with his homosexual agenda.

UPDATE 1-1 in 5 gay, bisexual men in US cities has HIV

CHICAGO, Sept 23 (Reuters) - "Nearly one in five gay and bisexual men in 21 major U.S. cities are infected with HIV, and nearly half of them do not know it, U.S. health officials said on Thursday.

Young men, and especially young black men, are least likely to know if they are infected with HIV, according to a study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."


Read it all

"Vote As If Your Life Depends on It"

Democrats CANNOT afford to be honest with the American people. If they were, they would have their butts kicked in a major way. It's stealth-like action all the way, folks.

Yes, the average American is beginning to wake up to the radicalism of President Obama and his comrades in Congress. But, most don't have a clue how deep the extremism runs.

Watch this video, via the American Thinker:

Sharia Law Exposed

Since I have been reporting that the worldwide spread of Sharia Law is the goal of Islamists, it would be beneficial to share the details of this Islamic law so people can see exactly what it involves.

Read closely because, if Muslims have their way, this could be your future. From Human Events:

Jihad to Subvert the Constitution
by Connie Hair

[...]

"Key Tenets of Shariah

The following are some of the most important—and, particularly for Western non-Muslims, deeply problematic—tenets of shariah, arranged in alphabetical order. The citations (in full in the linked report, edited here for length) for these findings are drawn from the Koran, schools of Islam and other recognized sources are offered as illustrative examples of the basis for such practices under shariah.

1. Abrogation (‘Al-mansukh wa al-nasikh’ in Arabic—the abrogated and the abrogating): Verses that come later in the Koran, chronologically, supersede, or abrogate, the earlier ones. In effect, this results in the more moderate verses of the Meccan period being abrogated by the later, violent, Medinan period.

2. Adultery (‘Zina’ in Arabic): Unlawful intercourse is a capital crime under shariah, punishable by lashing and stoning to death.

3. Apostasy (‘Irtidad’ or ‘Ridda’ in Arabic): The established ruling of shariah is that apostates are to be killed wherever they may be found.

4. Democracy & Islam: Any system of man-made law is considered illicit under Islamic law, for whose adherents Allah already has provided the only law permitted, shariah. Islam and democracy can never co-exist in harmony.

5. Female Genital Mutilation.

6. Gender Inequality: Shariah explicitly relegates women to a status inferior to men.

• Testimony of a woman before a judge is worth half that of a man.

• Women are to receive just one half the inheritance of a male.

• Muslim men are given permission by Allah in the Koran to beat their wives.

• Muslim men are given permission by Allah to commit marital rape, as they please.

• Muslim men are permitted to marry up to four wives and to keep concubines in any number.

• Muslim women may marry only one Muslim man and are forbidden from marrying a non-Muslim.

• A woman may not travel outside the home without the permission of her male guardian and must be accompanied by a male family member if she does so.

• Under shariah, to bring a claim of rape, a Muslim woman must present four male Muslim witnesses in good standing. Islam thus places the burden of avoiding illicit sexual encounters entirely on the woman. In effect, under shariah, women who bring a claim of rape without being able to produce the requisite four male Muslim witnesses are admitting to having had illicit sex. If she or the man is married, this amounts to an admission of adultery.

• A Muslim woman who divorces and remarries loses custody of children from a prior marriage.

7. ‘Honor’ Killing (a.k.a. Muslim family executions): A Muslim parent faces no legal penalty under Islamic law for killing his child or grandchild.

8. Hudud Punishments: The plural of hadd, is 'a fixed penalty prescribed as a right of Allah. Because hudud penalties belong to Allah, Islamic law does not permit them to be waived or commuted.'

• 'Shariah stipulates these punishments and methods of execution such as amputation, crucifixion, flogging, and stoning, for offenses such as adultery, homosexuality, killing without right, theft, and "spreading mischief in the land" because these punishments were mandated by the Qur’an or Sunnah.' (Islamic Hudood Laws in Pakistan, Edn 1996, 5.)

9. Islamic Supremacism: belief that Islam is superior to every other culture, faith, government, and society and that it is ordained by Allah to conquer and dominate them.

10. Jew Hatred: Anti-Semitism is intrinsic to shariah and is based on the genocidal behavior of Mohammed himself in wiping out the entire Jewish population of the Arabian Peninsula.

11. Jihad: Jihad is warfare to spread Islam.

12. Lying/Taqiyya: It is permissible for a Muslim to lie, especially to non-Muslims, to safeguard himself personally or to protect Islam.

13. Slander/Blasphemy: In shariah, slander means anything that might offend a Muslim.

14. Underage Marriage: Islamic doctrine permits the marriage of pre-pubescent girls. There is no minimum age for a marriage contract and consummation may take place when the girl is age eight or nine.

15. Zakat: the obligation for Muslims to pay zakat arises out of Koran Verse 9:60 and is one of the Five Pillars of Islam. Zakat may be given only to Muslims, never to non-Muslims. What amounts to a mandatory tax is required to be given to those engaged in jihad which is among the authorized recipients.

• According to shariah, there are eight categories of recipients for Zakat: The poor; Those short of money; Zakat workers (those whose job it is to collect the zakat); Those whose hearts are to be reconciled; Those purchasing their freedom; Those in debt; Those fighting for Allah (Jihad); Travelers needing money (‘Umdat al-Salik, h8.7-h8.18)

• 'It is not permissible to give Zakat to a non-Muslim.' (‘Umdat al-Salik, h8.24)"

"The West Will Convert to Islam"

Hear them in their own words.

From Memri TV, via John McTernan:

"The Hard Left Takeover of the Military" Fails

The defeat of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal was a major loss for the progressive agenda. Their plan involved much more than simply allowing homosexuals to serve in the military.

Read about Obama's sinister plans for our military from John McTernan:

"God just protected the American people, as the sodomizing of the army was just defeated. Also, the amendment to allow abortions in the army was defeated. This was a tremendous victory over evil. You must understand the magnitude of this defeat. In a real way, the fate of the American people was a stake with this defeat.

Defense Bill Stalls on Procedural Vote, Senate Blocks 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' Repeal 09/21/10 'A massive defense spending bill that includes a repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" law banning gays from serving openly in the military stalled Tuesday after failing to clear a procedural hurdle in the Senate.'

If this bill was not defeated and homosexuals were allowed to serve openly in the military, the Hard Left was all set to destroy anyone in the military who stood for morality and against sodomy! The Obama regime had generals in place that were ready to drive out all that would not cower and submit to the Hard Left. The driving out of real men and women would have left the military in complete control of the Hard Left reprobates.

Obama MUST have the loyalty of the military to crush the American people. All tyrants must have the military with them to stay in power. The following article proves exactly what I am saying. God just spared the American people. Please gives thanks to the LORD for His mercy to us!

Top general calls Christian soldiers 'bigots' 09/16/10 The following quotes are from Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, the Army's deputy chief of staff in charge of personnel matters, who last month spoke about 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' before several hundred troops at the European Command headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany.

'Last month, a top military official offered a glimpse of how the military might look should the new policy take effect: Those serving who oppose the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) agenda are no longer welcome.'

'Unfortunately, we have a minority of service members who are still racists and bigoted and you will never be able to get rid of all of them,' Lt. Gen. Bostick said. 'But these people opposing this new policy will need to get with the program, and if they can't, they need to get out. No matter how much training and education of those in opposition, you're always going to have those that oppose this on moral and religious grounds just like you still have racists today.'

The Obama regime was going to purge the military of anyone with the fear of God. Let me say this again: the Hard Left planned, and was all set, to purge the military of any real soldier who would not go along with the sodomizing.

Once the leadership was in their hands, they could demonize the public, who were also against their agenda. They now would have a soulless, godless military who would go along with them. They need the military to pull off their takeover and right now they were defeated! I think the Left was so confident of victory that the general gave this speech. It is now clear to all America what the Hard Left was going to do to the military

I tried warning Americans of this danger within the military late last year. I found a report titled: Strategic Implications of American Millennialism from the School of Advanced Military Studies, Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS. This report was a blistering attack on Bible believing Christians. I was on several radio shows about this report and its implications, but it seems it generated little interest among Christians.

I do not think the average Christian realizes how much the Hard Left hates and despises us and the great danger they pose.

I went to college and sat under their godless teachings. I was a federal agent for 26 years, and worked amongst the Hard Left. I closely watched them in action. On line, I debated many hard core Leftists, and on this blog for several years, I have watched very closely the Hard Left reprobates. I have read a lot of their writings.
These people have an agenda to take over America and destroy all who stand in their way. Bible believing Christians are directly in their way. Many of them are killers in their hearts, and you can easily tell this, as they admire Castro, Mao and any other 'Leftist' tyrant. They need the army and law enforcement to take over the nation, and sodomizing the military was the perfect way of purging out anyone who opposed them. What a victory this was.

The Hard Left has just suffered two major setbacks. The Sharia law mosque at Ground Zero has stalled as the public rejects it. The people are really starting to understand Islam and Sharia law. And now, the defeat of sodomizing the military.
The Hard Left is really backed into a corner. I fully expect them to become more vicious and treacherous as the election draws near. Complete victory seemed so close, but now it is slipping away. They are more dangerous now then ever.

Make sure that you give thanks to the Holy God of Israel for protecting His people from the Hard Left takeover of the military."