Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Which Administration Is Lowering America's Standing Internationally?

Has anyone considered what the reaction would have been if this Wikileaks fiasco had happened under the leadership of George W. Bush? My, my, I do believe genuine hysteria would have ensued, and Bush would have been taken to the woodshed on a daily basis.

Read from the American Thinker where such a scenario was considered:

Rethinking Foreign Policy
By Vasko Kohlmayer

"A thought experiment for you: Imagine that CableGate happened when the name of the American President was George W. Bush and the name of the Secretary of State was Condoleezza Rice.

A frenzied hysteria would surely break out in the media and Congress. Incompetence, neglect, stupidity, betrayal, and worse would be charged.

Condoleezza Rice would be forced to resign within hours of the documents' appearance on WikiLeaks. Impeachment proceedings against Bush would start within days.

But what is good for the goose should also be good for the gander, should it not?

It just so happens that one of the greatest diplomatic gaffes in the history of global foreign affairs was committed on Mrs. Clinton's watch. Now the whole world can go to the internet and learn -- courtesy of Mrs. Clinton's State Department -- that the world's so-called leaders are for the most part liars, crooks, or worse. Thank you, Mrs. Clinton. You have done the people of the world a great favor. Now they can see what their political betters are made of.

Too bad that America became compromised in the process. Our foes and friends alike will not easily forgive us the fact that we have spilled the beans. Such rank incompetence is inexcusable.

As if this were not bad enough, our friends at the United Nations have also learned that Mrs. Clinton put them under surveillance. She was even checking their credit card accounts. What was the logic behind that? one wonders. Do they not have the right to freely spend the money they stole from their own populations? They will not take Mrs. Clinton's nosiness kindly.

When George Bush was in office, liberals constantly complained that his actions and conduct lowered America's standing in the world. But it turns out Bush was nothing when compared with the current gang.

They told us that Barack Obama would restore respect for America on the world stage. Instead, America's reputation is today at the lowest point ever. Friend or foes -- this administration has embarrassed and offended them all."


How convenient that President Obama has thrown his greatest potential adversary in a 2012 primary under the bus. Good ole Hillary. Is this more of Obama's thuggery?

Read from Atlas Shrugs:

WIKILEAKS: Obama's War on America, Target Hillary Clinton

[...]

"The President has attempted to distance himself from the WikiLeaks attack. This could only be accomplished with the tacit support and silence of the media. He is the President. He is responsible.

Obama had Hillary handle the entire WikiLeak fall-out, despite the fact that it is Obama's failure and continuing failure.

But it could not have escaped any lucid American that it was Hillary who was targeted in this WikiLeaks dump. How convenient for Obama. His only competition in the communist party for 2012 is Hillary. Period. There is no way Mr. Assange got his hooves on hundreds of thousands of documents from the State Department, etc., without someone at the senior level of the White House and the Justice Department turning a blind eye and a deaf ear. Particularly a dump so unflattering to Clinton. I am no fan of Clinton but that is hardly the point.

This is O's MO. And he has no compunction taking the Democrat party down with him. Armaros called it 'a political suicide bomber. Go down and take people with him for the Revolution.' Make no mistake. Hillary was the target. America's reputation and hegemony are another Obama casualty. The damage is incalculable. After this, no nation will work with us. No nation will trust us. People on the ground will not put their lives and their families' lives on the line for so reckless and feckless an 'ally.' No one person has done more to jeopardize American lives and make the American people unsafe than President[Obama].

This WikiLeak is no accident, but a play by the revolutionary left that came in with Obama. There is no way one guy leaked all this without the help of very senior people and the Communist infiltration of our government. Will the seditionists be tracked down and prosecuted? Hardly. They will be lauded at White House dinners with $100 Kobe steaks."


Much more here.

12 comments:

Diogenes said...

Black helicopters cruising past your front window now, MoreLies?

Rightwingnuts are hysterical... in every sense.

banned said...

After an initial wave of British msm hysteria (which continues only on the BBC) all that has been revealed so far is. gossip and trite crap.

The BBC breathlessly reported yesterday that Wikileaks 'revealed' Obama rebuffed both Gordon Brown and Dave over UFO hacker Gary McKinnon.
That comes under "We already knew that" does it not? Just like most of the ''revelations' to date.

"David Cameron was seen as “lightweight” by Barack Obama"
Common currency at the time.

"Prince Andrew spoke bluntly about corruption during a trade mission".
That's what Andy does, he's very good at it.

"Prince Charles does not command the same respect as the Queen, "
Does anyone?

"Silvio Berlusconi responded to leaked claims by American diplomats that he has a penchant for “wild parties” by claiming he only throws parties in a “proper, dignified and elegant way”.
Been around for years.

"American officials suspect that North Korea has been secretly aiding Iran in its attempts to build nuclear weapons "
Surprised?

"The White House has told federal agencies to tighten security around the US military computer network following the leaking of classified information"

&etc. all of them either not new, not surprising or not interesting.

The only remaining point of interest is whether Mr Assange is assasinated before being stitched up for supposed sex crimes in Sweden.

Anonymous said...

DiogenASS: Your claiming to be an educator would be hysterical if children weren't involved!

Diogenes said...

AnonyMoron: Your claiming to be a human being would be hilarious if other real human beings weren't involved.

JDL said...

Anyone with half a brain can see that soros/obama are behind the leaks. Obama wants/needs as much distrust in our govt as possible. That is why the Bank Of America, as I write this, is summoning an army of lawyers. Because the next dump is from a hard drive from the BOA.

First it was our military, then the WH, and next the financial sector from Wikileaks which is connected to Soros. Assanges' lawyer does pro bono work for Soros Open Society.

Top down, bottom up, inside out.

The next is riots from the entitled students and the oppressed unions.

Unlike Dio, the school girl name caller, I choose to defend my country from the State Socialist attacking my Country, instead of putting my head into the sand.

Diogenes said...

Yeah? When was the last time you saw a Socilaist attack the U.S.? It's a figment of your overactive rightwingnut imagination.

JD said...

A socialist attacks America everyday. He is called obama. He and soros both hate America and want to destroy it.
Leftwing zealots are blind and stupid, or maybe you have been promised ruler of colorado under the new regime.
This crap happens for a reason.
Same as pushing homos on the military. The christians must be purged out so the military will be full of radicals. The military can then be used on the American people.

Diogenes said...

You rightwingnuts are worse than Joe McCarthy, imagining Commies hiding in everybody's frontyard shrubs. What overblown hysteria coming from complete no-nothings!

Seventy percent of the armed forces have no problem whatsoever serving with gays. They're serving with gays NOW, JustaDumbass... or do you somehow believe that, if a gay doesn't openly admit to being gay, they're not really gay? Do you think that gays are REALLY going to attack heterosexual members of the freakin' Armed Forces?

No, you rightwingnuts want to persecute anybody and everybody that doesn't fall into lockstep behind your goose-steppin' facism. Nobody wants you to be gay, JustaDumbass. Hell, nobody gay OR straight could even think of hav ing sex with you without hurling. So you have nothing to worry about. Let people live their lives, especially when they're not hurting you one iota.

Anonymous said...

DiogenASS: you’re in denial, thumbsucker.

Are you trying to say that socialism isn't a system based in a marxist ideology and that the democrats are fundamentally leftwing socialist in their practices and beliefs?

com-mu-nism (kom'yuh niz uhm) n.
1. a theory or system of social organization
based on the holding of all property in
common, actual ownership being ascribed
to the community as a whole or to the
state.
2. (often cap.) a political doctrine or
movement based on Marxism and developed
by Lenin and others, seeking a violent
overthrow of capitalism and the creation
of a classless society.
3. (often cap.) a system of social
organization in which all economic and
social activity is controlled by a
totalitarian state dominated by a single
and self-perpetuating political party.
4. (often cap.) the principles and practices
of a Communist Party.


so-cial-ism (soh'shuh liz uhm) n.
1. a theory or system of social organization
in which the means of production and
distribution of goods are owned and
controlled collectively or by the
government.
2. (in Marxist theory) the stage following
capitalism in the transition of a
society to communism, characterized by
the imperfect implementation of
collectivist principles.

Everything the democrats have done is based on a socialist/marxist ideology.

If it quacks like a duck, it's most likely a duck or diogenass just getting his daily goosing, take your pick.

JD said...

They may be serving with gays, but DADT says gays can't openly admit they're gay moron.
So how does a soldier know who's a homo?
Where did your 70% number come from? moveon.org? The huffington post?
I've seen polls to the contrary.

In another idiotic rant, you claim that i think homo soldiers will attack straight soldiers.
One more example of a leftwingloon distorting the obvious.
If the left can force openly gay people on the military, then christian soldiers will being to get out. After a while, our military will be made up of radicals, who will then enjoy carrying out radical orders against the American people.
It is all part of the communist leftist long range plan. Force every vile and immoral thing they can on this country. Kind of like the way you try to force your stupid views here. Only you're a pencil neck liberal with no power or nuts.

Diogenes said...

Very nice definitions ofsocialism and communism, AnonyMoron.

But so what?

You asked two questions:

"Are you trying to say that socialism isn't a system based in a marxist ideology..."

"and that the democrats are fundamentally leftwing socialist in their practices and beliefs?

Socialism and communism are certainly systems based in Marxist ideology. That much you got right, for the most part.

Are Democrats fundamentally leftwing socialist in their practices and beliefs?

No.

And nothing you've said proves -- or even really suggests -- that that is true.

All property being own by the state/community? Democrats don't say that. You may BELIEVE that to be the case, but you offer no proof to back up your belief, and there is none.

Regulating industries is NOT remotely close to the state OWNING all property, or even "collectively controlling" all property.

Now, I don't expect you to be capable of understanding this profound difference... but that doesn't mean you're right. It just means you're extremely dense/thick-headed.

JD said...

Understand is a relative term, coming from a fool with only one viewpoint.
I my view, there's plenty YOU don't understand, and never will.