When the radicals in our public school system are not attempting to Islamicize our children, then they are forcing their homosexual propaganda down their throats. Have they ever heard of the "three Rs"?
Read from WND:
No opting out of pro-gay school propaganda
A foretaste of what the American military will experience?
By Brian Fitzpatrick
"If your child attends school in Vallejo, California, he will watch pro-gay propaganda videos whether you like it or not.
Forced by the ACLU to provide 'mandatory diversity training' to students and faculty, the Vallejo Unified School District is now showing all students 'anti-bullying' films produced by a homosexuality affirming San Francisco group called GroundSpark. Among other topics, the films discuss same-sex relationships.
'No one should take my rights and tell me what can be shown to my children,' said Vallejo mother Cookie Gordon at a fractious Nov. 18 school board meeting.
'We do not feel that this is an area that students can opt out,' school superintendent Floyd Gonella told KNTV after the meeting. He continued, 'We feel this is an area we don't have to give prior notification.'
There are six protected classes in California that cannot be discriminated against, harassed or bullied,' said Pacific Justice Institute Chief Counsel Kevin Snider. 'Religion, race/ethnicity national origin, gender, disability, and sexual orientation. The school district is showing three films, but the films don't protect all six classes equally, as the law requires.' Snider contended that two of the GroundSpark films being shown, 'That's a Family' and 'Straightlaced,' are primarily pro-gay.
'One of the problems is that African-Americans who have seen the film shown to the board were offended and distressed by the representations of African-Americans, that they were drug addicts, broken families, inarticulate,' Snider added. 'However, in contrast, the lesbian and gay parents that were portrayed had much more information on them than other groups, and it was all extremely positive. There was no protection of religion at all.'
'This is sex education because you have to be involved in sex to be a lesbian or to be a gay man,' contended a second mother at the meeting. 'Now what you do in your home, that's your home, but as far as me and mine, my children are not ready for this.'
'Nowhere in the state law does it prohibit you as a school board from doing an opt-in policy,' argued a third woman.
According to Snider, the school district has the authority to offer both opt-out and prior notification of the diversity sessions if it chooses to do so.
California law permits parents to opt out of sex education classes, but the school district denies that the 'anti-bullying' films constitute sex ed."
Read it all.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yeah, the kids of those Religious Rightwingnuts are probably EXACTLY the kind of kids that need to hear an anti-bullying message!
This whole post is damn near incomprehensible with its "logic". The biggest flaw is that, while there certainly are classes of people that are constitutionally protected, there's nothing in the law -- nor should there be -- that all protected classes have to be protected in the same way in all situations. If you protect someone against gender discrimation, for instance, there's absolutely no reason why you have to provide "equal time" to all protected classes, just for the sake of "equality". So for anybody to say "There was no protection of religion at all" is just moronic, since no law requires that.
Even funnier is the unidentified mother who supposedly said "This is sex education because you have to be involved in sex to be a lesbian or to be a gay man." Really? Do you have to be involved in sex if you're heterosexual? A person's sexual identification is separate and apart from the act of sexual intercourse; there are plenty of heterosexuals AND homosexuals that are virgins and/or celibate. You don't have to be in an active sexual relationship to know if you're attracted to the opposite sexor the same sex.
So "No", Religious Rightwingnut Mommy, it's not "sex education" when your kids are encouraged not to beat the shit out of some other kid that they perceive to be a fag or a dyke. It's called "common sense" and it appears some parents are devoid of it, too. Maybe they should watch the films WITH their kids.
Post a Comment