Obama to move to the center? Not a chance! He's on a mission to totally transform this country, and if Congress will not support him in his efforts, he has other plans.
Read about the stealth-like plans President Obama has for our beloved nation, via Dick Morris:
OBAMA USING EXECUTIVE ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT RADICAL AGENDA
By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann
"Does President Obama plan to move to the center in response to his overwhelming rejection at the polls on November 2nd? No way! Instead, he is moving to implement, through executive action, two of the most controversial items in his 2010 agenda — a carbon tax and pollution permit system and a ban on the use of secret ballots in union elections. Through executive action by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Obama Administration is planning to effectuate both policies without asking Congress.
Never mind that he couldn’t persuade even a top heavy Democratic Congress to pass either program. Or that public opinion polls show massive rejection of both measures. Or that each is a sure job killer by itself — and together, they are even worse. This arrogant, ideologically-driven radical is determined to have his way and the public be damned!
The EPA is currently soliciting public comments for its plan to use the Clean Air Act of 1970 to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. The Clean Air Act, as the name indicates, is designed to fight against pollution — unhealthy chemicals that are belched into the air by smokestacks. It was passed to fight sulfur dioxide, particulates, nitrous oxides and other chemicals that cause human diseases. To use it to fight carbon dioxide — which we all breathe without ill effects — because of concerns about global warming — is a perversion of the law.
Worse, because the Clean Air Act is designed to protect public health by measuring aggregate pollution in each geographic area, it limits economic development in communities where the pollution levels exceed prescribed standards. But carbon dioxide doesn’t poison anyone. It makes no sense to ban factory expansion in areas where the nature of the industries is that there will be high carbon dioxide levels (like oil area of Texas and Louisiana). But that’s what the EPA plans to do, virtually making economic growth illegal in large parts of the United States.
Meanwhile, Craig Becker, the former chief counsel of the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) — now the head of the NLRB — has secured a 3-2 majority party line majority to repeal the Dana decision which mandates secret ballots in unionization elections. The NLRB will rule that if a majority of workers check off that they want a union on cards then the union will automatically be approved without a secret ballot vote of the entire workforce. Currently, if a majority of the workers sign the cards, a secret ballot vote is then triggered. Frequently, the union loses these elections, proving that the card check off is subject to coercion and bullying. The Democratic majority in the Senate wouldn’t approve the card check change so the NLRB is planning to accomplish the same objective administratively, trapping workers into unionization they would reject if afforded the opportunity to vote by secret ballot.
Both the pollution permit/carbon tax and the forced unionization proposals will be job killers. The U.S. has maintained its 25% share of global manufacturing by replacing workers with energy driven machines. In the past ten years, the number of manufacturing employees has declined by 33% but our production has risen by 50%. But automation takes energy — lots of it — by taxing energy, we are eliminating the strategy that has preserved our jobs. And massive unionization of the private sector will also drive out our jobs. Since 1990, unionized manufacturing jobs have declined by 75%. But non-union manufacturing jobs have actually risen over the same period by 15%.
After he lost Congress in 1992, Bill Clinton, too, resorted to executive orders to maintain his momentum as president. With Congress unwilling to pass anything he proposed, the president canvassed the Administration for ideas that could be implemented by executive orders. A very productive period followed during which tobacco regulation, higher educational standards, affirmative action reform, and other key measures were implemented without asking Congress’ permission. But Clinton’s executive orders were on subjects on which Congress had not voted. They did not contradict the express will of the body. Obama is using the strategy to act in direct defiance of Congressional action. He is passing ideas Congress refused to pass, even when he had huge majorities.
Obama will live to regret these moves. Republicans in the House will defund these actions and insert legislative language making it a crime to spend appropriated funds to implement them. By this strategy, all of the controversial Obama legislation will be at issue during the budget fight — taxes, Obamacare, cap and trade, and card check. The more these issues are inserted into the budget fight, the greater the chances of Republican victory.
So President Obama has not learned the lessons of 2010 and likely never will."
Monday, November 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
I don't know enough about the environmental issue to comment. But Dick Morris is dead wrong on the issue of card check. He's a pretty ignorant guy, so maybe he just doesn't understand the issue, but I'd be willing to bet he's just flat-out lying.
Here's the card check system as it currently exists:
If 30% of the workforce sign cards expresing a willingness to unionize, then the NLRB sets up a secret ballot election. But if more than 50% of the workforce sign cards, then the union is "in" without a vote UNLESS the employer specifically asks for a secret ballot election, which they almost always do. (Can't blame the employers, make the union jump through all the hoops to get in, rather than just conceding.)
Now what the Employee Free Choice Act proposes is that the employer cannot demand a secret ballot vote if more than 50% of the workforce signs cards.Is that a pro-union move? Yeah, especially if your sympathies lie with management. But it could just as easily be viewed as a leveling of the playing field, which has tipped a little too far in management's direction. But to label it as a "job killer" is ridiculous hyperbole -- exactly Dick Morris' specialty, if he indeed has one.
The sky ain't falling, Chicken Littles. Not on card check, for sure.
But there’s actually Great News for America, the American people are waking up to this administrations leftwing lunacy and agenda.
The sky is actually falling for king chicken-shit and his band leftwing lemmings.
Obama Falls to 39%
Going, going, gone in 2012!
http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1924
Zogby isn't even a pollster anymore... he's a rightwingnut shill.
The only poll that counts is in November 2012. And, so far at least, none of the potential Republican candidates is a threat.
Just to provide you little "fact-lovers" with some data:
"President Obama At 47% Approval
Nov 23, 2010
There’s a story going around today about how President Obama only has 39% approval (according to a new Zogby poll) but it’s important to point out that Zogby is a very untrustworthy pollster and that both Gallup and Rasmussen (which has a heavy Republican bias) both have President Obama at 47% approval!
President Obama’s approval in both of these polls has bottomed out at 41% (most recently on June 18th in the Rasmussen poll and October 24th in the Gallup poll) so there’s no evidence from the daily tracking polls that Obama’s approval is now heading south.
In fact, Obama has been between 41% and 50% in the Rasmussen poll every single day since October 6, 2009 (when he was at 51%.) Very similarly he’s between 41% and 50% in the Gallup poll since January 8th of this year when he was at 52.
While Obama shed a lot of support in his first year, he has pretty much held steady for the past year in an area where he could very well win reelection, but where it probably depends on how much the voters like his Republican opponent. If Sarah Palin wins the nomination, he’s probably in a very good position!"
http://www.thepresidentialcandidates.us/
November 22, 2010
"The new Quinnipiac poll shows Sarah Palin holding a narrow plurality among Republicans across the country for the party's presidential nomination in 2012. And at the same time, the poll makes clear that while President Obama is vulnerable in a closely-divided country, Palin would be the GOP's worst possible nominee for the general election race.
Among Republicans and GOP-leaners: Palin 19%, Romney 18%, Huckabee 17%, Gingrich 15%. Bringing up the rear are Tim Pawlenty at 6%, Haley Barbour 2%, Mitch Daniels 2%, and John Thune 2%. The Republican primary poll has a ±3.1% margin of error.
And for the national match-ups against Obama:
• Obama leads Palin by 48%-40%
• Romney edges Obama by 45%-44%.
• Obama edges Huckabee by 46%-44%.
• Obama leads the lesser-known Daniels by 45%-36%."
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/quinnipiac-poll-palin-narrowly-leads-2012-gop-field----and-badly-trails-obama.php
Dio,
You are jsut plain uninformed or wanting to mislead people on purpose.
The truth behind card check is not just simply about voting. It is the devil in the details as with ALL OF OBAMAS SMOKE AND MIRRORS BILLS HE HAS PASSED.
"Under the existing law today, workers have a chance to vote for or against unionization in a private-ballot election that is federally supervised. Under Card Check, if more than 50% of workers at a facility sign a card, the government would have to certify the union, and a private ballot election would be prohibited—even if workers want one.
By forcing workers to sign a card in public—instead of vote in private—Card Check opens the door to intimidation and coercion. Over 70% of voters agree that a private election is better than card check.
Card Check could put government regulators in charge of private business decisions.
Once a union is certified, the business and union would only have 120 days to reach agreement, before facing the prospect of being forced into binding arbitration. This means a panel of government arbitrators who may have no understanding of the business could impose a two year contract deciding all workplace terms—without any vote by the company or its employees.
By placing government regulators in charge of a two-year decision, business flexibility is limited—at a time in our history when it is needed most. A recent poll found that 75% of voters believe government arbitrators should not decide the conditions of a union contract."
Card Check would unfairly punish businesses.
Card Check would impose harsh new penalties on businesses—but not on unions—for violations during the union recognition process. This is unfair, and potentially disastrous for small or medium businesses, who are not familiar with unionizing campaigns or the National Labor Relations Act. If Card Check passes, many of these businesses would be facing unionization for the first time.
So DIO is for MORE GOVT AND UNION CONTROLS OVER BUSINESS, BIG SURPRISE THERE.
Stupidity, just plain stupididty. Why in the world would we give UNIONS more control over the businesses.
"Union control over businesses"?
Are you JOKING?
There's a smaller percentage of union workers in this country than ever before. And I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing. I'm not a huge fan of unions, even though I belong to my local teachers union.
I didn't lie about ANYTHING, JustaDimwitLoser. You're misleading people into believing that it's so damn simple for unions to strong-arm people into signng checkoff cards. It's not. I've been on both sides of those kind of organizational drives, and the deck is definitely stacked in favor of management. It's not easy AT ALL to convince non-union workers that they ought to invite a union in to bargain for them. There's really only one reason why a union EVER gets brought into a company:
The company has screwed over its workers -- or, at the very least, the workers' perception is that the company has screwed them over.
If management treats its workers fairly, why would anybody ever join a union? To get the right to pay union dues, in exchange for... nothing they couldn't get without a union? To wear an ugly-ass union t-shirt?
C'mon, JustaDimwitLoser, get real. You don't have any experience in any of this, do you? You quote some unnamed source as if it were MoreLies' Bible, and you accept is lock, stock, and barrel. And I will GUARANTEE it's a pro-management source, because it reads just like a Chamber of Commerce bit of propaganda.
When I practiced law, one of my jobs was representing company management against the union. I know the little dirty tricks management AND labor can pull in a certification process. And the ONLY time management ever lost one of these certification campaigns is when the company treated its workers like crap. When that happens, you're going to get a union. And you DESERVE it!
Oh, and one specific comment you quoted deserves special rebuke: "if more than 50% of workers at a facility sign a card, the government would have to certify the union, and a private ballot election would be prohibited—even if workers want one."
Guess what?
If more than 50% of workers at a facility sign a card TODAY, a private ballot election would be prohibited -- even if the workers want one! Only the EMPLOYER can ask for a private ballot election in that case. So this whole propaganda nonsense about workers not being allowed to have a secret ballot election is exactly what happens RIGHT NOW, under existing law. All the proposed card-check lawwould do is eliminate the company's right to DEMAND such an election. The workers have no say, now OR later, to demand an election, once that card is signed by more than 50%.
So quit buying into the rightwingnut bullshit without using the brain cells God gave you. He won't be offended if you learn how to think, really! Heck, since we were created in His image, I bet He might even be proud of you if you tried to think.
By the way, JustaDimwithLoser, take a basic Civics course sometime. No President "passes bills".
The whole reason for public signings is so the corrupt unions can identify their enemies.
Then if the union does succeed in getting in, the no votes will be treated unfairly.
It's the union mentality, plain and simple.
And without businesses, you fool, this whole discussion is moot.
NO BUSINESSES, NO JOBS!!!
So lets push business profits lower and lower while giving lazy union workers more and more. What a formula for growth.
And as for the commie's moronic carbon tax, it speaks for itself.
Only a democrat would want to tax what humans exhale and trees breathe in. Nothing is out of the realm of stupidity for these fools.
Have you ever witnessed a union campaign, JustaDumbass? Have you ever worked with a union? In a union?
You have no idea what you're talking about... you're just flapping your gums (with your two teeth) mouthing stupid rightwingnut sound bites.
If your rightwingnut ideas about economics work so damn well, how come we've been in a recession that started a year BEFORE the 2008 election? If the Bush tax cuts work so well, how come the economy is in the condition it is?
And if you have the crazy idea that two whole years of Democratic control in Washington could wreck your precious rightwingnut system so badly, I've got news for you: your system SUCKS if it can't withstand two years of contrarian power. You think you're going to blackmail voters into always voting for Republicans, because only Republicans can fix the economy?
Guess again.
Ummm. Did someone lose my reply or did it not go through?
I believe MoreLies printed everything that you submitted,provided it was intelligent and relevant.
In other words, nothing.
What's the deal Debra?
JDL posted a comment for that knot-head dio and you still haven't put it up.
There was a comment I deleted days ago with a sexual reference that I didn't want to post. I can't remember who left it or on which post, if that is the one you are referring to.
I also recently deleted one of Diogenes' comments which was also sexual in nature. Try to keep them clean everybody.
Post a Comment