Tuesday, November 9, 2010

God's Foreign Policy Is Very Clear"

Now, that the election is over, keep your eyes on what happens regarding Israel. I expect President Obama to come at the Jewish nation with a vengeance. He must work quickly because he wants his agenda of creating a Palestinian state fulfilled before we approach the 2012 presidential election.

Get your finances in order because any push against Israel, especially in terms of Jerusalem, will cause the wrath of God to fall upon our nation, and it's likely to hit us economically. May God have mercy on us, as we suffer for the decisions made by our president.

A commenter at World Tribune says it best:

"Soon, very soon, should Obama turn further against Israel, the U.S. will collapse for turning against the APPLE OF HIS EYE. God's foreign policy is very clear. 'I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.' This has been seen with ancient Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, Spain in 1492. England lost her empire when she turned against Israel as did Nazi Germany. Next?"

Read from World Tribune, via John McTernan Insights:

Report: Obama's post-election agenda calls for
a Palestinian state or else


"With the mid-term elections over, President Barack Obama is expected to resume heavy pressure on Israel, a report said.

The Center for Security Policy asserted that Obama would threaten U.S. relations with Israel after the Democrat Party's loss in congressional elections on Nov. 2. The Washington-based institute said Obama would press for the establishment of a Palestinian state over Israel's objections.

'Once the 2010 elections are behind him, it is a safe bet that President Obama will revert to form by once again exhibiting an unmistakable and ruthless determination to bend Israel to his will,' the report, authored by Frank Gaffney, said.

Gaffney, a former Defense Department official, said Obama plans to increase pressure on Israel to unprecedented levels after his party's historic defeat in congressional elections. He said the president had eased pressure on Israel in response to Democrat candidates who feared a Jewish backlash.

'Unfortunately, what the president has in mind for Israel after the election will make his previous treatment of the Jewish state look like the good old days,' the report, titled 'Obama's Not-so-hidden Agenda,' said on Oct. 26.

The report echoed previous assessments by the Israeli government and intelligence community of a crisis with the United States in the aftermath of the U.S. elections. The Israeli assessment envisioned that Obama would accelerate efforts to establish a Palestinian state in the West Bank regardless of Israeli concerns.

'Worse yet, he will be able to take advantage of a vehicle for effecting the so-called 'two state solution,' no matter how strenuously Israel and its friends in Washington object,' the report said. 'The Palestinians will simply unilaterally declare themselves a state and ask for international recognition — and Mr. Obama will accede to that request.'

During the spring of 2010, U.S.-Israel relations were said to have dropped to one of their lowest points in more than 50 years. Gaffney said Obama vilified Israel and forced it into territorial, political and other concessions to the Arabs.

'To be sure, ties between the United States and Israel — far and away America's most important and loyal friend in the Middle East — have improved lately from the nadir to which Mr. Obama plunged them since he took office,' the report said. 'That has nothing to do, however, with a change of heart or agenda on the part of the president and his administration.'

Gaffney said Obama could provide U.S. recognition to any unilateral declaration of Palestinian independence. Another option was that the president abstain from a resolution in the United Nations Security Council that would recognize a Palestinian state.

'The truth is that, either way, Mr. Obama will have dealt Israel a potentially mortal blow,' the report said. 'Without control of the high ground and water aquifers of the West Bank, the Jewish state is simply indefensible and unsustainable.'

The report said Obama could also agree to deploy U.S. forces in the West Bank in wake of a declaration of Palestinian independence. Gaffney warned that international forces, including Americans, would soon protect Israel's enemies in a policy similar to that of the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon.

'The same is certain to eventuate in the West Bank as paramilitary forces the United States has foolishly trained and equipped become a standing army and fall under the sway of Hamas,' the report said."

8 comments:

Diogenes said...

Your hysterical shrieking is getting tiresome.

Get your finances in order, because God's gonna wreak havoc with America's economy?

Better yet, buy an annotated Bible to help you understand Scripture better than your Religious Rightwingnut sources do.

JD said...

Go pack some fudge, reprobate.

Anonymous said...

DiogenASS: If you don’t like it here, why waste your time and ours with your leftwing gibberish and lies?

Get lost clown, nobody will miss you!

Diogenes said...

The Bible and Public Policy
by Jeffrey S. Siker:

"And so the question must be raised: Whom does the Scripture address? Who is the intended audience? It must be stated clearly that the Bible does not address the public at large, let alone public-policy issues. Rather, it speaks to the people of God, the community of faith. It is the church’s book, the synagogue’s book, which bears witness to God’s redemptive activity in the past, present and future. As a witness to God’s activity and presence, it issues a call to faith, a call to repentance, a call to commitment and a call to be in the world but not of it.

This does not mean that the Bible provides no guidance to Christians as individuals or as a community regarding how to live in the world. It does mean that attempts to legislate public policy on the basis of Christian ethics found in the Bible are illegitimate. Attempts to do so approach idolatry by turning Christian ethics into that which it simply cannot be -- of the world. For the internal life of Christian community the Bible indeed may play a constructive role for social ethics -- bearing witness to the variety of shapes and expressions of faith among the earliest Christians. But to press the Bible beyond the bounds of Christian community is to forget that the world is not the same as the community of faith.

Those who use the Bible in public-policy discussion must implicitly assume in some way that a particular society can or should be identified with the covenant community of God. Clearly this is President Reagan’s assumption, or perhaps his hope, regarding America. This assumption clearly runs counter to the Christian understanding, expressed in the New Testament, that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female -- and, we should add, neither black nor white, Republican nor Democrat, Russian nor American -- for all believers are one in Christ. Christian community transcends the national and social barriers we have erected. By so doing it anticipates and points to the Kingdom of God, though it does not presume to establish that kingdom in God’s stead."

http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=997

Diogenes said...

Gosh, yet another homophobic comment from JustaDumbass, and yet another Archie Bunkerism from AnonyMoron.

What a surprise!

Diogenes said...

Thank you, MoreLies. Without your Religious Rightwingnut blatherings, I never would have had a reason to do some research on your supposd theology.

Now I have found out how deep your heresies are.

http://www.christianzionism.org

Christian Zionism. John Hagee. Hal Lindsey. Tim LaHaye and the "Left Behind" groupies. "The Rapture". Virulent anti-Islamic thought and deed.

In other words, your typical script, MoreLies. But now, it makes more sense. Not that Christian Zionism makes sense, because it doesn't make ANY sense. But, after reading about these kooks, your entire agenda becomes much more clear.

You WANT a war in the Middle East, so that it will trigger the "end days" and you get a quick ticket to Heaven.

Or so you think.

So anybody believing in tolerance, diplomacy, etc etc has to be shouted down.

This whole blog of yours has little, if anything, to do with political conservatism or political liberalism. It's all about stoking the fires, fanning the flames, to force what you think will be the Second Coming.

But you know what, MoreLies? It's not up to you and your ilk to force Jesus Christ to do anything. He'll get here when He wants, and not a moment sooner. So don't kid yourself into believing that you're setting the table for Him.

He doesn't need your "help".

And He sure as heck doesn't appreciate how you twist His message into something so anti-Christ-like.

Shame on you, MoreLies.

Diogenes said...

Where's your denial, MoreLies? Or do you first have to consult with John McTernan Insights, or John Hagee Ministries, to find the proper response when someone calls you out for Christian Zionist heresies?

Diogenes said...

Guess I pegged it pretty accurately... MoreLies won't even attempt a denial, even as weak-ass as it would have to be.