You libs can rail all you like about Fox News, but this news organization is kicking butt. Eat your heart out!
From Weasel Zippers:
Domination: Fox News Election Night Ratings Crush Competition, More Viewers Than MSDNC and CNN Combined…
"Olberdouche, Tingles, Madcow simultaneously hardest hit…
(WaPo)- 'Fox News Channel towered over its cable news rivals on election night, attracting more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined.
In primetime, an average of 7 million viewers chose FNC to get their election news, while CNN attracted an average audience of 2.4 million and MSNBC averaged just shy of 2 million.
For real election-news junkies, FNC was also the place of choice. Between 6 a.m. Tuesday and 3 a.m. Wednesday – so-called “total day” in Nielsen-speak – FNC averaged just over 3 million viewers, overshadowing CNN, which hovered at 980,000 viewers for the whole day, and MSNBC’s 838,000.
Some press reports noted FNC had also beat all three broadcast networks’ coverage of the election. (This doesn’t take into account Fox broadcast network, which aired election programming from 9-10 p.m. Tuesday night).
From 10-11PM, FNC averaged 6.9 million viewers, while early Nielsen stats indicate ABC averaged 9 million, CBS averaged 6 million, and NBC averaged 6.1 million.'"
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Kicking butt? Eat your heart out?
I don't know about you, but since I don't work for any television networks, I don't give a crap who wins ratings battles. Why would anybody outside of the industry care? Do winning ratings means that the content of their news is quantifiably better? No.
Faux winning a ratings contest proves that rightwingnuts know where to party: Faux Noise, proud sponsor of the Republican Party.
Post a Comment