The biggest hypocrite feels the heat, and after all, it is election season. After three times excluding God from the famous words in the Declaration of Independence, President Obama has FINALLY included the "Creator" segment to the famous words.
I suppose we're supposed to believe that, all of a sudden, his acknowledging that God exists means that he's a true Christian. Fat chance! That's about as phony as his little trip to church several weeks ago. Notice he hasn't shown his face inside a church since.
Watch here: Real Clear Politics, via Weasel Zippers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't... by Religious Rightwingnuts.
How about a story about the crazy Texas "pastor" who's avocating armed revolution against Obama? That's right up your alley!
DiogenASS: before pointing your finger at other peoples dirt, clean up your own house, ass-wipe!
The NEA’s (National Education Association’s) recommended reading list includes two books by communist community organizer Saul Alinsky that advocated the violent overthrow of the U.S. government.
http://www.nea.org/tools/17231.htm
You can go back to sucking your thumb now.
I read Alinsky's books, and he NEVER advocated the violent overthrow of the American government! That's just rightwingnut bullshit propagated by other rightwingnuts who don't know what they're talking about.
About the most violent thing Alinsky ever advicated for was having protestors eat a dinner of baked beans before attending a posh symphony concert attended by corporate leaders in Rochester NY. The result was less than melodious, but hardly "violent"!
Debra: are you going to post my response to that nit-wit diogenASS?
Thanks
DiogenASS: You're a liar! Only a psycho communist radical would claim that the communist Alinsky's philosophy and teachings were actually meant to teach peace and harmony to the masses.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2314
As Alinsky put it: “A reformation means that the masses of our people have reached the point of disillusionment with past ways and values. They don’t know what will work but they do know that the prevailing system is self-defeating, frustrating, and hopeless. They won’t act for change but won’t strongly oppose those who do. The time is then ripe for revolution.”[1]
“[W]e are concerned,” Alinsky elaborated, “with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace, cooperation, equal and full opportunities for education, full and useful employment, health, and the creation of those circumstances in which men have the chance to live by the values that give meaning to life. We are talking about a mass power organization which will change the world … This means revolution.”[2]
"We are talking about a mass power organization which will change the world … This means revolution"
rev-o-lu-tion (rev uh lue'shuhn) n.
1. a complete and forcible overthrow and
replacement of an established government
or political system by the people
governed.
2. a sudden, complete, or radical change in
something: a revolution in church
architecture; a social revolution caused
by automation.
3. a. a procedure or course, as if in a
circuit, back to a starting point.
b. a single turn of this kind.
4. a. a turning round or rotating, as on an
axis.
b. a moving in a circular or curving
course, as about a central point.
I rest my case, thumsucker!
Anonymous, is that last comment the one you were referring to? It got sent to a spam area again. Sorry, I have no idea why that happens. Sometimes when I try to transfer it, it's a success, but occasionally I lose it. So, if a comment doesn't get posted, just re-send it.
Debra: thats the one, thanks
Try reading Alinsky, instead of some rightwingnut's carefully edited and excerpted version. Alinsky specifically spoke out,with disdain, about the college radicals of the 1960s wo were advocating for the violent overthrow of the American government. Alinsky had absolutely no use for that kind of talk.
But don't worry: I wouldn't expect you to even try to read Alinsky. You wouldn't understand him, as he often uses words of three syllables or more, and there are no pictures in is books.
DiogenASS: When a liberal can't win the argument they change the argument and try to discredit the source.
"We are talking about a mass power organization which will change the world … This means revolution"
"We" is a nominative plural of I, which means Alinsky as well, moron!
Advocating "revolution" isn't calling for the overthrow of a government?
See definition above, thumbsucker!
Now, leftwingloons are redefining Webster’s definitions.
No wonder they can't govern, throw the illiterates democrat bums out of DC before it's too late.
Are you REALLY this stupid, AnonyMouse?
Maybe you should read what YOU say before you attack your own comments!
You originally claimed that Alinsky "advocated the violent overthrow of the American government".
I replied that Alinsky never advocated the violent overthrow of anything, and that he was not into violence as a tactic, in general.
You then tried to turn it around to say "revolution" instead of "violent overthrow".
I can't help it if you were stupidly incorrect in originally saying "violent overthrow" if you meant something else. But you said it, and you were wrong. And when I called you on your error, you decided to get your panties in a wad and head for your local dictionary to spin out of your error.
You can run, but you can't hide (your stupidity), moron.
DiogenASS: Alinsky advocated "Revolution"
Definition of Revolution is “a complete and forcible overthrow and replacement of an established government or political system by the people
governed.
“forcible overthrow” is peaceful, thumbsucker?
Semantics fool! Your heads going to spin off if you keep talking in circles.
You have to be the dumbest person in that school, get your head out of that fat progressive ass of yours and start thinking as an American instead of some lollypop sucker in candy land.
I accept your apology for poorly choosing your words to start with, AnonyMouse. You meant to say something else, but you mistakenly said "violent overthrow" instead.
It's a mistake -- a stupid mistake, even -- but not the end of the world. And it's good that you were man enough to admit your error.
Post a Comment