That slimeball over at Wikileaks has released more war documents which will more than likely place our troops in greater danger. Surprisingly, the American Pravda has had little to say about this subject. Their lips are sealed. Of course, they never gave a d*** about the welfare of our men and women in uniform. Why would they start now?
Julian Assange had better watch his sorry butt or his efforts to harm our troops may just clear President Bush of the false charges made by the Left against him for lying about WMD. With good reason, he probably feels confident that the corrupt American Pravda will cover for him.
On a daily basis, I pray that righteousness will prevail concerning the truth about WMD. We have three possible scenarios here:
1) Bush made up false charges to lead America to war with Iraq. If that was the case, he should suffer the consequences for his actions.
2) Bush got faulty intel from both domestic and foreign intelligence agencies which led him to believe that Saddam Hussein was a threat and must be taken out before another 9/11 took place. If that were so, then he is not guilty of lying about WMD.
3) Saddam did indeed have WMD, and they were moved to Syria prior to our invasion. What dictator in his right mind would not remove evidence against himself when he knew we were coming after him and his weapons?
Somebody is lying. We all have our opinions, but there is One who saw it all. I pray that He will cause those who are guilty of lying to reap the evil that they have sown and that righteousness will prevail.
Read from Gateway Pundit and discover the juicy info from the latest Wikileaks release of military documents:
Wikileak’s Papers Reveal US Troops Did Find WMD in Iraq
"Do you suppose this will make any headlines?
Anti-American crackpot Julian Assange revealed today in his leaked Wikileak’s documents that US troops did indeed find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Ace reported on this from the Danger Room:
'WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins, and uncover weapons of mass destruction…
…In August 2004, for instance, American forces surreptitiously purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard, a toxic “blister agent” used as a chemical weapon since World War I. The troops tested the liquid, and “reported two positive results for blister.” The chemical was then “triple-sealed and transported to a secure site” outside their base.
Three months later, in northern Iraq, U.S. scouts went to look in on a “chemical weapons” complex. “One of the bunkers has been tampered with,” they write. “The integrity of the seal [around the complex] appears intact, but it seems someone is interesting in trying to get into the bunkers.”
Meanwhile, the second battle of Fallujah was raging in Anbar province. In the southeastern corner of the city, American forces came across a “house with a chemical lab … substances found are similar to ones (in lesser quantities located a previous chemical lab.” The following day, there’s a call in another part of the city for explosive experts to dispose of a “chemical cache.”'"
And this comment from Gateway Pundit is interesting:
"I am a former Air Force Target Intelligence Officer. Most of Saddam Hussein’s WMD were sent to Syria before the (Second Gulf War) war. It was very quiet, and not dramatic, like the Iraqi Air Force fleeing to Iran in the First Gulf War. The weapons remain there now, safe (for now) in the hands of another Baathist regime. We went to war for entirely justified reasons; I have never understood why the Bush administration did not say/reveal more in order to clear and defend its reputation. Saddam’s generals repeatedly begged for the use of WMDs to no avail–they were already gone."
And another:
"My husband was there in 2003.
YES there were WMD’s but the Iraqis on the ground said that most were sent to Syria."
Here are some links to read from commenters at Gateway Pundit:
UN Admits Saddam Had WMD
In Oct. 2003, DNI Nominee James Clapper Said It Was ‘Unquestionably’ True That Iraq Moved WMD To Syria
Iraq's Yellowcake
Iraqi Documents Show Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
WMDS Big
Wikileaks reveals WMD hunt found many chemical “surprises”
UPDATE: Fox News covered this story on Fox and Friends early this morning, so the truth is getting out to the American people.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
LMAO The WikiLeaks guy is a traitor for leaking info, but the supposed Air Force Target Intelligence officer and the wife of some unidentified guy who was there in 2003 spew what should be secret intelligence on a rightwingnut blog without a negative comment?
Bush is in the clear... wheter or not he was justified in invading Iraq, he'll never be held accountable for it.
The info about WMD is a red herring that would never put our remaining troops in jeopardy. Now, the stuff about us knowingly using torture until 2009? That could be problematic. And the documented massacre of civilians killedin sectarian violence? That could be a problem, too.
Diogenes, the Wikileaks leaks are specific in nature, whereas the info from the two commenters is not. Big difference.
It's supposedly info from people "in the know" that WMD existed and were shipped to Syria. That's specific enough.
But anonymous sources? AnonyMouse has shown us, time and time again, how trustworthy they are!
DiogenASS: I never use leftwing wiki other than to make fun of your leftwing wiki facts & information.
I can't stand liberals, why would I use them to validate any facts or information?
Wiki-leaks on the other hand did release actual military documents, unless you believe that the leftwing fool who released the documents somehow doctored them to support the Republican’s claim about the presence of WMD before the liberation of Iraq.
Why would a leftwing liberal do that?
I’ve always used your leftwing friend’s at wiki to rebuke your own leftwing facts, thumbsucker!
Like shoving your face in the same shit that you're trying to sell us.
You didn't know that fool? What a water-head.
WikiLeaks isn't the supposed source of the material that this rightwingnut blogger cites and I commented on, AnonyMouse.
I was referring to the supposed (and anonymouse) "Air Force Target intelligence officer" and the anonymouse wife of some anonymosue guy that was anonymously stationed in AnonymouseVille, Iraq. THOSE are the anonymouse sources I was questions, not the documents leaked by WikiLeaks.
As for what you personally do with Wikipedia, I don't know and I don't care. But when you misquote or misuse info from Wikipedia or anywhere else (which is about all you do when you post any comment) I'll call you on your idiocy, AnonyMouse, just like I have been.
You're an ignorant putz... but I guess I'm not telling you anything you haven't already heard, from a million different sources. (It's probably even on Wikipedia.)
DiogenASS: How can you "misquote or misuse info from Wikipedia" when I've always posted the information with a link to the page at wiki?
What a thumbsucking idiot!
You are a lying sack of worm puss. You have cut & pasted Wikipedia stuff on many occasions without even acknowledging that it's not your words you're using, but somebody else's.
Head down to the VFW and tell the boys how you beat dem Japs at Pearl Harbor.
DiogenASS: don't you think liar, liar, pants on fire argument is rather childish and foolish, thumbsucker?
Prove it, ass-wipe!
Head back down to your favorite bath house and tell your boy friends what a man you tried to be today, peewee
You think you're worth my time, going back through MoreLies' archives to find all the times you plagiarized? Guess again. I know you did, you know you did, end of discussion.
My personal favorite example of AnonyMouse Plagiarism was when you explained that we all get our information from SOME other source, so it was perfectly acceptable to cut and paste somebody else's work and claim it as your own.
Every time I rhetorically ask if you can get any more stupid, you manage to prove you can.
Yes You Can!
Yes You Can!
Yes You Can!
Post a Comment