How much "hope and change" can America take? President Obama is intentionally destroying what's left of our nation a la Cloward-Piven strategy.
What kind of man can purposely allow Americans to suffer while he drives our country into the ground? It's mind boggling that someone can be so heartless just to achieve his goal of a socialist utopia.
Read from Human Events:
Obama’s War on Prosperity
by Doug Patton
"As Barack Obama partied with his vacuous, celebrity friends this week, with galas at the White House and elsewhere, the American middle class sinks further into the morass he has created with his doomed policies.
If FDR had his WPA as part of his New Deal and LBJ had his War on Poverty as part of his Great Society, then surely BHO has his War on Prosperity as part of his Fundamental Transformation of America during his Summer of Recovery.
Not since the time of Nero has so much idle fiddling taken place while a society burned.
It has gone well beyond incompetence. It is even beyond tone-deaf tinkering. This man is deliberately trying to destroy the nation he was elected to lead. Why? Because he hates it; it's that simple.
He looks at the United States of America as a limitless pot of gold in the hands of a few, who stole it from the less fortunate over the last 500 years.
Obama's insistence on allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire on the most productive among us is testimony to his malevolent ignorance. He really believes that those who have accumulated more than he deems necessary are evil and must be plundered by government to the greatest degree possible.
Hence, his call—during a deep and severe recession—for a tax increase on the only people who are in a position to create jobs. Instead of encouraging our entrepreneurs, Obama seems bent on destroying capitalism, which he despises, and decimating the working class, whom he desires to see in bondage to government.
Ronald Reagan was fond of quoting Thomas Jefferson's admonition that a government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have. Obama seems determined to pattern his administration on just such a premise.
As an educated man, Obama should know that big government never provides people with liberty. Ask yourself: When was the last time big government set someone free — anyone, rich, poor or in between? Such a scenario has never existed in the history of mankind.
The prosperous among us, most of whom have worked hard to accumulate their wealth, are enslaved by the taxes that gobble up much of the resources that would otherwise go to create new jobs.
Those in the middle class likewise are victimized by higher taxation because they have less to spend on other things and therefore the economy suffers. Stealing from the rich through confiscatory tax rates only profits government, not the middle class. And the poor are destroyed in body, mind and spirit by a system that says, 'You can't make it on your own, so we'll have to take care of you.'
When job-producing wealth is stolen from the private sector by government, everyone suffers. Regardless of what 'class' you fit into, how is your life enhanced when government robs from someone else?
I would like to believe that the upcoming off-year election is going to truly change things, but then I hear Republican leaders like John Boehner, who will likely be the next speaker of the House, tell the Sunday morning talking heads that he is willing to compromise and accept a partial continuation of the Bush tax cuts if that's all he can get out of the President. Anyone who has ever bargained for anything knows that you don't start out the negotiations by saying, 'I want to pay $100 for your widget, but I'm willing to pay more.' Likewise, the seller never starts the process by weighing in with, 'Well, I want $250 for my widget, but I'll take as little as $100.'
Similarly, Boehner should not start the bidding with a statement like, 'I'll vote for whatever tax cuts I can get,' when the reality is that tax increases on anyone — especially the prosperous, especially at a time like this — are a prescription for economic catastrophe.
It might be a cliché, but no poor person ever gave me a job. Wealthy people — or at least prosperous upper-middle-class small business owners — have given me every job I have ever had in my life. If you think about it, the same is true for you.
Perhaps if Barack Obama had ever had a job, he would understand that principle, too."
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
God forbid that people who make over $250,000 might have to pay an additional 4% in income tax. Why, that would mean an additional $10,000 in taxes! How DARE those Robin Hoods in Washington making rich people pay more in taxes!
Who cares that it's the same tax they used to pay, before the TEMPORARY Bush tax cuts?
We love rich people! They give us jobs, like manna from heaven, just because we like them, and they like us. We cannot piss them off by expecting them to pay their fair share of taxes now, can we?
They are laughing at your silliness, rightwingnuts. They are screwing YOU, and you're excusing their conduct. How bizarre can you be?
DiogenASS: if the democrats want to attack private sector businesses with more taxes and regulations ( the engine of America’s economy), why should they expand and hire more people?
freeze hiring until the democrats are thrown out of DC.
The leftwingloons should know better than to bite the hand that feeds them, thumbsucker!
payback is a mother!
DiogenASS: Why should Conservatives want to pay more taxes to support the democrat union bailouts and campaign contributions?
Not to mention the taxpayers footing the bill for the leftwingloons backroom deals, bribes and slush fund?
If the democrats need union payoffs and bribe money, they can shell it out of their own pockets!
Dang, AnonyMouse, just when I figure you can't get any dumber, you do.
Look up "retained earings" in your little online dictionary. And, once you have, try to figure out why corporation after corporation are piling their profits into retained earnings, rather than distributing it to shareholders as dividends.
They're hanging on to their profits to try to force Obama's hand. The very entities that YOU want to give a tax break to are the ones fueling this recession.
You don't reward spoiled children by giving them what they want. Same thing with corporations.
DiogenASS: you don't give greedy union bosses taxpayer dollars to distribute the money to corrupt democrats as a bribe or payoff either.
doesn't the democrats Nazi collaborator have enough money to bankroll and finance all their nefarious dealings?
"Perhaps if Barack Obama had ever had a job, he would understand that principle, too."
Funny stuff. Obama has a job: he's President of the United States.
And, according to the Republican Party, Obama is the owner of a small business!
"GOP Definition Of 'Small Business' Owner Includes President Obama" by Matt Finkelstein
Despite several polls showing support for President Obama's tax proposal, the GOP is maintaining its rigid opposition to any plan that does not extend tax breaks for the nation's top earners. The GOP argument hinges on the claim that ending the Bush tax cuts would affect not only the wealthy, but small business owners across the country. Specifically, GOP lawmakers are repeating ad nauseam the misleading claim that "half of all small business income" would be subject to higher tax rates under Obama's plan.
However, as Bloomberg reports today, there is an overlooked problem with the GOP's numbers. The party's definition of "small business" owner is so loose that even President Obama and billionaire financier George Soros would qualify:
[Senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell's numbers only add up if you consider people like billionaire investor George Soros, most movie stars and Obama himself small-business owners, tax experts say.
That's because the lawmaker is basing his figure on a broad definition of the term that experts say includes authors, actors and athletes who employ few if any workers. It also encompasses businesses that many people wouldn't consider small, such as Soros's hedge-fund firm and major law partnerships.
It's particularly amusing that Obama would count as a "small business" owner, according to the GOP, considering the frequent assertion by party leaders that the White House doesn't understand small businesses. Just today, for example, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) described Obama's tax plan as "an assault on job creators" from an administration "with no business experience."
http://politicalcorrection.org/
"you don't give greedy union bosses taxpayer dollars to distribute the money to corrupt democrats as a bribe or payoff either."
Help me out, AnonyMouse, as I seem to have misplaced my Bullshit-to-English Dictionary.
What the heck are you trying to say?
And they're hanging on to retained earnings to force obamas hand". How dare they decide to keep EARNED money because obama wants more of it. You see simpleton,the only thing proping up this whole mess is the American businesses and workers spirit to keep working. We all pay hidden taxes from the minute we wake up every day. Gas, phones, sales tax on the nessecities of life(except for welfare recipients who pay no sales tax), fees everywhere you look. The gov't has an enormous appetite for other peoples earnings. They will always find a way to spend whatever they can steal, then spend more borrowed money on TOP of taxes collected. I am sick and tired of your spouting off some study from some professor done on some gov't grant, biased to end at a favorable result to obamas plans. obama has a JOB? Wow!!! The skinny kenyan even says in his book that the one time he held a job, he felt like he was in enemy territory. Because he doesn't fit it where his paycheck is dependent on his performance. The paycheck he gets now damn sure doesn't reflect his performance.People like you and obama don't know what work is. He should stick to community organizer in chicago. Can't wait till November!!!!
Post a Comment