Video: George Bush sings about Obamavilles
The great uniter himself, President Obama, is dividing our nation on race. Blacks will defend him until the bitter end, no matter how far he takes them into the gutter. Whites, on the other hand, have awoken from their lunacy in electing such an incompetent man to the highest office in the land and prefer Bush.
Check this out from Weasel Zippers:
ABC News Poll: White Voters Want Bush Back, 45% – 41%, Non-Whites Prefer Obama, 75% – 14%
"Waaaacism!…
Via a new ABC News/Yahoo poll:
'…There are two roots of the public’s preference for Obama over Bush to run economic policy today. Obama’s better in his base: Ninety percent of Democrats prefer him, vs. 76 percent of Republicans who’d prefer a Bush encore. And independents, the swing voters in such matters, prefer Obama over Bush on the economy by a 16-point margin, 49 percent to 33 percent.
Obama also does much better vs. Bush among young adults, women, low-income Americans and members of racial minorities – reflecting partisan patterns, these being more Democratic groups.
Most strikingly, Obama’s preferred to Bush among nonwhites by 75 percent to 14 percent, while whites divide more evenly — 45 percent for Bush, 41 percent for Obama.'"
Give it a few more months, and independents will be pining for Bush.
6 comments:
So, in other words, the only people who really "Miss me yet?" Bush are white rightwingnuts.
What a surprise.
Dio I noticed you did not choose to comment on the other blogs, like a marxist running for Congress or OBAMA and the fairness doctrine. So I gather that YOU AGREE WITH Obama that it is ok to silence free speech and that YOU agree with a self-professed Marxist. WHAT A SURPRISE........
Actually, AnonyMouse, if I choose to not comment on one or more of MoreLies' posts, it's usually because I'm not all that interested in it.
The Fairness Doctrine? Don't really care that much, one way or another. Add to it the fact that it's a manufactured "controversy" (i.e., it's unlikely anything like the Fairness Doctrine will ever be seriously discussed in the near future) and I had to stifle a big yawn.
And the "Forgotten Man", Gilad Shalit? I would have had to know of him and have cared about him at one point in time in order for him to ever qualify as being "forgotten". Since MoreLies says so, I'm sure he's a fine man and he's being unfairly victimized... but it doesn't interest me. I'm not fixated on the minutiae of Israel the way MoreLies is. I'm more concerned about America.
Oh,and the Marxist running for Congress? Look it up, moron: it was a joke. And, WOW, you're a joke yourself. Common ground between you and the "Marxist"!
DIO the jokes on you and your fellow progressives.
Obama is a danger to America and he just keeps proving it by circumventing congress. The American people will not take it anymore. The failed attempt to take over the military with DADT was the final smack down.
The only lies I am seeing, are the lies from Obama and his merry marxist.
"The failed attempt to take over the military with DADT?"
Ignoring your usual homophobia, AnonyMouse, that's just one of the most ignorant assinine comments you've made in awhile. And that's saying something.
Obama's administration has TALKED a good game about DADT, but in reality they'vedone next to nothing to repeal DADT. Obama COULD have issued an executive order to, at least, stop the enforcement of DADT, but he hasn't.
So Obama hasn't used DADT for anything.
And, even if he had, how would repealing DADT allow Obama to "take over the military"?
Do you envision this massive secret army of homosexuals just waiting, biding their time until DADT is repealed, and then they'll come out of the woodwork (or closet, if you prefer) to pledge allegiance to the Communist-in-Chief and decimate the brave men of the Straight Armed Forces of the United States of America?
What the hell are you drinking, old man?
dio you do not even know what your own progressives are doing , OR DO YOU and you are just not saying.
If DADT passed they would have purged the current military personel that objected to the law. This would of lead to a dangerous situation. They already forced McCrystal out and some of the comments by current generals are alarming.
dio, try researching a little before running your progressive mouth.
From the Wash Times:
Those serving who oppose the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) agenda are no longer welcome.
Those were the views of Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, the Army's deputy chief of staff in charge of personnel matters who spoke about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" before several hundred troops at the European Command headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. "Unfortunately, we have a minority of service members who are still racists and bigoted and you will never be able to get rid of all of them," Lt. Gen. Bostick said. "But these people opposing this new policy will need to get with the program, and if they can't, they need to get out. No matter how much training and education of those in opposition, you're always going to have those that oppose this on moral and religious grounds just like you still have racists today."
The strong words take additional significance from Lt. Gen. Bostick's direct involvement with a Pentagon panel charged with shaping military policy on this issue. Although Lt. Gen. Bostick presented the question of homosexuals in the military as if it were about civil rights, it is nothing of the kind. The services must discriminate to function. Those who are too old, too weak or too overweight must be shown the door even when similar actions in the private sector might spark a lawsuit. The reason for the military's existence is to win battles and wars, not to ensure feelings aren't hurt or to serve as a playground for social experimentation.
The military's long-standing ban on homosexual conduct is rooted in the principles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which also criminalizes adulterous conduct among heterosexuals insofar as it undermines the good order and discipline of the armed forces. Lt. Gen. Bostick suggested he would employ the same strict disciplinary standards to provide "education and training" that would ensure soldiers, sailors and airmen embrace the new LGBT agenda.
"Unfortunately, if the law is repealed, the military will attempt to do what it does - makes things work, for better or worse," Tommy Sears, executive director of the Center for Military Readiness, told The Washington Times. "So there will be no toleration of dissent. If for whatever reason you disagree, whether it's religious conviction or personal objection, your career will in essence be over."
DIO you were saying? I thought so.
Post a Comment