Thursday, September 2, 2010

More Deaths in Afghanistan Under Obama Than Bush

Since the corrupt American Pravda is unlikely to disclose the fact that more American servicemen have died in Afghanistan under Obama than during Bush's two terms in office, I thought you should be made aware of these numbers. I seem to remember our press dwelling on all the war casualties under Bush, to the tune of 24/7 coverage. Now, not so much. What a surprise!

Read from Gateway Pundit:

Grim Milestone: US Suffers More Fatalities in Afghanistan Under Obama Than Bush

"Don’t expect this to make any headlines. Don’t expect the radical antiwar left to hold any protests.
The United States has now lost more military men and women in Afghanistan under President Obama than during 8 years of the Bush Administration.

Photobucket
(I-casualties)

God bless our soldiers and Marines.

Related… As U.S. deaths in Afghanistan rise, military families grow critical."

3 comments:

Diogenes said...

Are you that simplistic? Really?

Did you forget about a little place called IRAQ, where Bushie basically sent 4000+ American kids to a needless death?

Afghanistan wasn't really an issue for Bushie; most Americans supported THAT war, as opposed to Iraq. That might ot be the case for much longer,however.

Anonymous said...

You’re right Debra, they would run casualties counts 24/7 under Bush, today’s network democrat news media is a joke.

They actually think American’s are buying into their BS, just because some American’s were stupid enough to buy the Hopey, Dopey, Changey Thingey, doesn’t mean they haven’t learned from their mistake.

Without ideological diversity in American journalism, the news will never be objective.

Diogenes said...

You people really are idiots, aren't you? The casualty counts were about IRAQ, not Afghanistan. Granted, "they all look alike" from your viewpoint, but if you pulled your head out of your posterior, your vision might improve.