No wonder Muslims and the Left get along so well. They both are in a constant state of rage.
From One News Now:
The eternal flame of Muslim outrage
Michelle Malkin
"Shhhhhhh, we're told. Don't protest the Ground Zero mosque. Don't burn a Quran. It'll imperil the troops. It'll inflame tensions. The 'Muslim world' will 'explode' if it does not get its way, warns sharia-peddling imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Pardon my national security-threatening impudence, but when is the 'Muslim world' not ready to 'explode'?
At the risk of provoking the ever-volatile Religion of Perpetual Outrage, let us count the little-noticed and forgotten ways.
Just a few months ago in Kashmir, faithful Muslims rioted over what they thought was a mosque depicted on underwear sold by street vendors. The mob shut down businesses and clashed with police over the blasphemous skivvies. But it turned out there was no need for Allah's avengers to get their holy knickers in a bunch. The alleged mosque was actually a building resembling London's St. Paul's Cathedral. A Kashmiri law enforcement official later concluded the protests were 'premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere.'
Indeed, art and graphics have an uncanny way of vitiating the Muslim world's atmosphere. In 1994, Muslims threatened German supermodel Claudia Schiffer with death after she wore a Karl Lagerfeld-designed dress printed with a saying from the Quran. In 1997, outraged Muslims forced Nike to recall 800,000 shoes because they claimed the company's 'Air' logo looked like the Arabic script for 'Allah.' In 1998, another conflagration spread over Unilever's ice cream logo -- which Muslims claimed looked like 'Allah' if read upside-down and backward (can't recall what they said it resembled if you viewed it with 3D glasses).
Even more explosively, in 2002, an al-Qaida-linked jihadist cell plotted to blow up Bologna, Italy's Church of San Petronio because it displayed a 15th century fresco depicting Mohammed being tormented in the ninth circle of Hell. For years, Muslims had demanded that the art come down. Counterterrorism officials in Europe caught the would-be bombers on tape scouting out the church and exclaiming, 'May Allah bring it all down. It will all come down.'
That same year, Nigerian Muslims stabbed, bludgeoned or burned to death 200 people in protest of the Miss World beauty pageant -- which they considered an affront to Allah. Contest organizers fled out of fear of inflaming further destruction. When Nigerian journalist Isioma Daniel joked that Mohammed would have approved of the pageant and that 'in all honesty, he would probably have chosen a wife from among them,' her newspaper rushed to print three retractions and apologies in a row. It didn't stop Muslim vigilantes from torching the newspaper's offices. A fatwa was issued on Daniel's life by a Nigerian official in the sharia-ruled state of Zamfara, who declared that 'the blood of Isioma Daniel can be shed. It is abiding on all Muslims wherever they are to consider the killing of the writer as a religious duty.' Daniel fled to Norway.
In 2005, British Muslims got all hot and bothered over a Burger King ice cream cone container whose swirly-texted label resembled, you guessed it, the Arabic script for 'Allah.' The restaurant chain yanked the product in a panic and prostrated itself before the Muslim world. But the fast-food dessert had already become a handy radical Islamic recruiting tool. Rashad Akhtar, a young British Muslim, told Harper's Magazine how the ice cream caper had inspired him: 'Even though it means nothing to some people and may mean nothing to some Muslims in this country, this is my jihad. I'm not going to rest until I find the person who is responsible. I'm going to bring this country down.'
In 2007, Muslims combusted again in Sudan after an infidel elementary school teacher innocently named a classroom teddy bear 'Mohammed.' Protesters chanted, 'Kill her, kill her by firing squad!' and 'No tolerance -- execution!' She was arrested, jailed and faced 40 lashes for blasphemy before being freed after eight days. Not wanting to cause further inflammation, the teacher rushed to apologize: 'I have great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone, and I am sorry if I caused any distress.'
And who could forget the global Danish cartoon riots of 2006 (instigated by imams who toured Egypt stoking hysteria with faked anti-Islam comic strips)? From Afghanistan to Egypt to Lebanon to Libya, Pakistan, Turkey and in between, hundreds died under the pretext of protecting Mohammed from Western slight, and brave journalists who stood up to the madness were threatened with beheading. It wasn't really about the cartoons at all, of course. Little-remembered is the fact that Muslim bullies were attempting to pressure Denmark over the International Atomic Energy Agency's decision to report Iran to the U.N. Security Council for continuing with its nuclear research program. The chairmanship of the council was passing to Denmark at the time. Yes, it was just another in a long line of manufactured Muslim explosions that were, to borrow a useful phrase, 'premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere.'
When everything from sneakers to stuffed animals to comics to frescos to beauty queens to fast-food packaging to undies serves as dry tinder for Allah's avengers, it's a grand farce to feign concern about the recruitment effect of a few burnt Qurans in the hands of a two-bit attention-seeker in Florida. The eternal flame of Muslim outrage was lit a long, long time ago."
We can add this act of rage to Michelle's list. How dare this Somalia man not bow down to Allah!
Somalia: Islamists Execute Christian Leader, Kidnap His Children to Convert Them to Islam…
"What a delightful 'religion'…
NAIROBI, KENYA (BosNewsLife)– 'A leader of an underground Christian church movement in Somalia has been killed by Islamic militants and his four children taken from their mother in what locals described as part of a deadly campaign against Christians, BosNewsLife established Monday, September 13.
Al Shabaab fighters, who have pledged to turn Somalia into a strict Islamic state, broke into the house of Osman Abdullah Fataho in Afgoi on July 21 and shot him dead in front of his wife and four children, Christians said. The assailants reportedly abducted the survivors, later releasing the wife on the condition that she allow her children to become soldiers.
“We know they have taken the children to brain-wash them, to change their way of life from Christian to Muslim and to teach them the Quran,” Christians said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Those kidnapped were identified as Ali Daud Fataho, 5, Fatuma Safia Fataho, 7, Sharif Ahmed Fataho, 10, and 15 year-old Nur Said Fataho.'"
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Your right!
The left is constantly whining and crying like a child for just about everything that doesn't go their way.
The muslims seem to have the mentality and intellect of a child and stuck in the 16th century.
In either case they clearly have a commonality, they both believe if they threaten and cry loud enough, they will get what they want.
But, when it comes to fighting for what they believe in, the muslims plant bombs and hide and use fear, the liberals won't fight for the country, but criticize and ridicule the ones that do to keep them safe and also use fear to get what they want.
They are both basically just cowardly children that want their way and they want it right now.
Well, they better start reaching for that rattles and bottles, because in November the Adults will be changing their diapers and putting them to bed.
AnonyMouse, you're just ridiculous in your vain attempt to connect radical jihadists with American liberals. There's really only two characteristics that those groups ihave in common:
1. You hate them.
2. You don't understand them.
Radical jihadists may have a mentality that's stuck in the 16th century, as you term it, but to suggest that they have the mentality of a child is not only off-base, it's dangerous. People who can pull off what they perpetrated on 9-11 are not "children" and, if you insist on underestimating them and treating them that way, you'll be paving the way for future 9-11s.
And as for your blanket statement that "liberals won't fight for the country", that's complete and utter bullshit. I'd challenge you to back it up, but it's obvious that you can't, so why bother? Now, if you had suggested that liberals tend to pick their battles more judiciously, you'd be correct; most liberals don't have the "shoot first and ask questions later" mentality that many rightwingnuts like you have. I'm kind of proud about that, so if you think you were being insulting, think again.
Isn't it interesting to see that most rightwingnuts who have that "shoot first and ask questions later" mentality just happen to be individuals who have never had to go to war themselves? Or they were supposed to go to war, but they found ways to weasel out of their obligation to serve so that they never found themselves in harms way (e.g., Saint Ronnie Reagan, Georgie Porgie, Big Dick Cheney, Donnie Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, Rash Limbore, Glenn Dreck, Sean Manatee and, yes, Slick Willie Clinton)?
DiogenASS: As far as 9/11 attacks being perpetrated by geniuses, that’s a false interpretation of the facts, actually liberal political correctness and appeasement caused the attacks on the 9/11, Fort Hood killer, Little Rock to be successful, liberals brainwash Americans into believing that radical Islam is a religion of peace, so why fear terrorist with box cutters?
Liberals are always regurgitating that Radical Islamist aren’t any threat to anybody, they are harmless, so why should American be afraid?
by the way,I don't hate anybody, people are free to believe in whatever they want and to follow their marxist dream for America if they chose.
I don't care what they do, as long as it doesn't affect my liberties and freedoms granted to all Americans by the Constitution and Bill of Rights!
But, when they use their political power and leftwing agenda being used to manipulate the system and assault our liberties and freedoms, most Americans find that unacceptable and will prove it this November.
AnonyMouse, you really are that stupid, aren't you? I never said or even hinted that the 9-11 conspirators were "geniuses". I said they weren't "children" and that it was stupid of you to underestimate them that way. What's so hard to understand about that? Do you really think that the only two options are to label them as "children" or as "geniuses"? Do you not reconize that it takes some level of intelligence and organization to pull off the 9-11 attacks? Getting the hitmen in place, getting them commercial airline pilot training, knowing which airports to take advantage of, coordinating the flights, etc etc etc? "Children" couldn't have done that, and you sure as hell couldn't have pulled it off.
As for your asinine (and unsupported) assertion that "liberal political correctness and appeasement caused the attacks", why, I'm shocked! Are you really suggesting that Americans caused the 9-11 attacks? I thought one of your many problems with the imam was his suggestion that American attitudes may have played a part in the attacks. Now, I guess you're agreeing with the imam!
And for the umpty-umpth time, NOBODY is suggesting that radical jihadists aren't a threat to anybody,as you claim. What liberals and/or any thinking person with a few active brain cells would say is that not all Muslims are "radical jihadists" and, therefore, not all Muslims have to be treated as th mortal enemy of all Americans. That rightwingnut screed you keep promoting is hogwash.
And, as sad as it might be for you, even Muslims are entitled to enjoy the same liberties and freedoms you so rapidly claim for yourself.
DiogenASS: where does it say anywhere that the terrorist were the masterminds behind the 9/11 attacks?
even children can follow instructions and a road map, those terrorist weren't the mastermind behind the attacks, thumbsucker.
they were just the stooges that followed the plans and carried out instructions.
no, I'm not suggesting that Americans caused the 9-11 attacks, I merely suggesting that liberal policies, appeasement and the lack of response to the many attacks by terrorist during the Clinton term didn’t help prevent the attacks.
Dang, it gets tiring playing "connect the dots" for you, AnonyMouse.
No, not all the terrorists that were aboard the plan are geniuses. Most were mindless thugs...but not all. And SOMEBODY planned the whole 9-11 operation, AnonyMouse. All of those that did were radical jihadists. They do not have the "intellect of a child", moron, no matter what you think.
Your overly-simplistic conclusions that liberal Democrats are responsible for eveything bad that happens in this country, and everything good comes about as a result of Religious Rightwingnuts, are not only wrong, but they're downright dangerous. If you want to place some blame on Clinton, because he's a Democrat, go ahead. But when you whitewash Bushie's and the rightwingnuts' parts in that FUBAR event, you're not looking at an accurate picture, and it helps set up future problems.
Those who do not learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
Post a Comment