Monday, August 30, 2010

Public Schools Rewrite History Regarding Islam

Those who despise America and want to Islamicize our country must be laughing hysterically about how easy those in authority are making their job.

Some public schools in America are offering courses on Islam. That would be all fine and good if the lessons were based on educating our children about religions throughout the world. After all, that would be part of world history. But, for some reason, Islam seems to receive more time and more preferential treatment, and that is where my gripe lies.

Read from the NY Post:

HS test 'slams' Christianity, lauds Islam
By YOAV GONEN

"State testmakers played favorites when quizzing high-schoolers on world religions -- giving Islam and Buddhism the kid-gloves treatment while socking it to Christianity, critics say.

Teachers complain that the reading selections from the Regents exam in global history and geography given last week featured glowing passages pertaining to Muslim society but much more critical essay excerpts on the subject of Christianity.

'There should have been a little balance in there,' said one Brooklyn teacher who administered the exam but did not want to be identified.

'To me, this was offensive because it's just so inappropriate and the timing of it was piss-poor,' he added, referring to the debate over the plan to build a mosque near Ground Zero.

The most troubling passage came from Daniel Roselle's 'A World History: A Cultural Approach,' observers said.

The passage reads: 'Wherever they went, the Moslems [sic] brought with them their love of art, beauty and learning. From about the eighth to the eleventh century, their culture was superior in many ways to that of western Christendom.'

Meanwhile, an excerpt listing the common procedures used by Christian friars to introduce the religion in Latin America stated that 'idols, temples and other material evidences of paganism [were] destroyed,' and 'Christian buildings [were] often constructed on sites of destroyed native temples' -- and built with free Indian labor, to boot.

'I can see why some people might see these questions as skewed,' said Mark MacWilliams, a religious-studies professor at St. Lawrence University in upstate Canton. 'Why does the exam seem to have only documents that portray Islam as a religion of peace, civilization and refinement, while it includes documents about Christianity that show it was anything but peaceful in the Spanish conquest of the Americas?'

At the same time, MacWilliams criticized the presentation of Hernando Cortes' conquest of Mexico -- which he said portrayed him as a 'choirboy' rather than a 'conquistador.'

'It's quite a whitewash,' he said.

Some other religious-studies experts contacted by The Post said they didn't see what the fuss was all about.

'[The] selections seem about equal in terms of being historically/culturally focused, all relatively positive about the contributions made by each religion as it was introduced into various societies,' wrote Barbara Sproul, an associate professor of religion at Hunter College in Manhattan.

Yet Michael Dobkowski, chair of Religious Studies at Hobart and William Smith Colleges in upstate Geneva, asserted that it was only Christianity for which both positive and negative aspects were highlighted.

'Some [essays] suggest a kind of Christian triumphalism and the desire to convert the other that is not present in the treatment of Islam,' he said. 'My impression is that there is certainly a divergence of approaches and impressions that should not appear in a Regents exam of this caliber.'

State education officials said that every effort had been made to present accurate historical information through the excerpts.

They said the questions had been developed over a four-year period and require students to use their own knowledge of social studies to produce answers.

They added that they weren't aware of any complaints about the exam.

The Muslim reading:

* 'Wherever they went, the Moslems [sic] brought with them their love of art, beauty and learning. From about the eighth to the eleventh century, their culture was superior in many ways to that of western Christendom.

* 'Some of the finest centers of Moslem life were established in Spain. In Cordova, the streets were solidly paved, while at the same time in Paris people waded ankle-deep in mud after a rain. Cordovan public lamps lighted roads for as far as ten miles; yet seven hundred years later there was still not a single public lamp in London!'"

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Leftwing liberals solely controlling academic curriculum is dangerous for America and The Republic.

A 13 year old girl drew a flag in art class with the words "God Bless America"
in California’s Santa Rita School District and ordered to stop drawing the American flag by an art teacher at Gavilan View Middle School, yet another student drew a picture of obama and was praised.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,592676,00.html

This is what happens to a system without diversity of ideologies and opinions.

No tax dollars for Soros schools of liberal indoctrination and leftwing brainwashing.

Diogenes said...

Yep, you sure can make some accurate generalizations about the current state of American public schools, based on what Sean Manatee says about ONE art teacher in ONE art class in ONE middle school in ONE town in ONE state.

Yep, we're all of a like mind.

You really caught us, AnonyMouse!

Anonymous said...

DiogenASS: NO, I'm not talking about you, leftwingloon.

I'm talking about teachers, your fantasy teaching career is not applicable to this discussion.

Diogenes said...

AnonyMouse, just because you never amounted to much in life, don't think that the rest of us are nonentities like you.

I'm a teacher, and proud of it. Whether you choose to believe it or not doesn't change that fact... just like all the other facts that you choose not to believe.

Anonymous said...

DiogenASS: yea, yea sure you are.

I'll play along, thumbsucker!

I love that story, I'm a teacher, I am, I am.

you're a funny little fool!

eric said...

Just dropped by to see if anything had changed.

Aside from the name calling and usual shallow understanding of reality, Diogenes is a teacher?!

Just imagine this left wing-nut "interpreting" the world for children.

Seriously Diog, get to the doc and get your meds straightened out. You aren't funny anymore.

I come to this blog to see what the extreme wings are saying. Often I learn about things the MSM would never address or report.

I am a high school teacher and finding out that Diog claims to be a teacher is truly frightening. To have this warped perspective inflicted on children gives me the shivers.

The good news is that kids are generally smarter than we think. A lot of the time they will just nod their heads and move in a direction of their own choice.

Oh, don't bother with the name calling and attacks Diog. I will probably not read them. You are still rather naive and boring (though more dangerous thanks to the teacher thing).

Diogenes said...

Awwwwww you guys are hurting my feelings now, doubting my career as a teacher. How will I ever be able to get through tomorrow's classes,knowing that you doubt me?

(Pretty easily, actually. If my sense of worth depended onclowns like you, I'm definitely in the wrong line of work!)

No need to thank me, fellas. Just doin' my job, and loving it!

Anonymous said...

Thank God there are still teachers like eric in our school system today that take their jobs seriously, when it comes to giving children the facts to analyze, research and interpret for themselves.

There's far to many teachers today that use their power of influence to manipulate the facts to support their own political and ideological agenda.

Diogenes said...

What do you teach, Eric, gym? Roll the balls out, let 'em play?

Couldn't be a class where critical thinking is necessary.

Debra Moore said...

Hey, Diogenes, you really should lay off the comments about "critical thinking". A true "critical thinker" would not fall for the Obama agenda and would recognize that he's hurting our economy. You are far from being such a person, but instead a major Kool-Aid drinker.

Diogenes said...

Hey, Ms. MoreLies, you really should lay off the comments about "critical thinking" until you get a clue what critical thinking IS. Between you, AnonyMouse, and JustaDumbas, the three of you have about a thimble-full of logic and reasoning skills.

Debra Moore said...

I don't know, Diogenes, we weren't foolish enough to vote for a man who is destroying the country and then have the audacity to talk about what a great job he is doing. Check back with me after 2 more years of Obama's devastating policies, and we'll see who is the critical thinker.

Anonymous said...

DiogenASS: I've never heard you articulate your position or message without ad hominem attacks, lies or conspiracy theories to support your opinions.

You call that "critical thinking"?

There’s a little thing called "FACTS" that are needed to reinforce your argument and solidify your position.

But, if ad hominem attacks, lies or conspiracy theories is your standard of intellectual superiority.

Then you win hands down,thumbsucker!

Diogenes said...

Sure, I recognize what "facts" are, AnonyMouse. They're what you run into when you plagiarize from Wikipedia or PBS! Otherwise, we'd never encounter any facts in what you offer.

Who clued you in on "ad hominem" by the way? Do you think that, if you pop it anywhere into your comments, it automatically makes you sound smarter? If so, you're RIGHT for a change! But that's just a testament to how stupid you normally sound.

And Ms. MoreLies, I didn't vote for a guy who's destroying this country. I voted for Barack Obama, not John "Bomb Bomb Bomb" McCain. I voted for the guy who is challenging a system that robs from the poor and gives to the rich. I voted for the guy who's trying to give everybody a chance of success, not just white babies born with the proverbial silver spoon in their mouth.

Has Obama done everything I could hope for? Nope. But he's a far sight better choice than Old Man McCain.