The left loves to accuse Christians of intolerance because we hold the Biblical view that homosexuality is a sin. Yet, they defend all things Islamic. Christians believe that God loves the homosexual, but hates their perversion and that mistreatment of gays is unacceptable. Muslims, on the other hand, kill homosexuals because of their sexual orientation. And we are the intolerant ones?
Liberals have also been quick to accuse Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush of being war mongers, but somehow they make excuses for jihadists. How many innocent people must the Islamists kill before the left wakes up to the truth that Islam is NOT a religion of peace?
The real reason leftists despise Christianity is because it is a threat to their ungodly policies.
Read more about the left's hostility toward Christians, via Jihad Watch:
Why won't the Left defend Christians as fiercely as it defends Muslims?
"In 'Why Won't the Left Defend Christians As Fiercely As It Defends Muslims?,' Andrea Tantaros at FoxNews.com (August 6) zeroes in on fashionable moral equivalence:
'The battle over the proposed mosque and community center near Ground Zero has sparked outrage and fury.
The argument from those who oppose it: it's an incredibly insensitive move designed to deliberately provoke the nation from a radical Imam who says the U.S. is culpable for the attacks of 9/11. They're correct.
What's surprising is the level of outrage from the other side -- mostly those on the left - who argue we must allow the building of the mosque and community center in the name of tolerance of Islam. Where are these shrieking voices in defense when other religions like Christianity and Judaism are under attack?
There has always been a double standard when it comes to understanding and explaining the Muslim religion verses [sic] Christianity.
While many Muslim countries ban women from voting, driving a car, and threaten to kill anyone who speaks of Christ within their borders, you rarely hear those on the left invoke sharp criticism or shake their finger in fury.
Instead, they save the attacks and their selective attention span for the random "Christian" who blocks an abortion clinic.
When the radical Islamic Fort Hood shooter claimed the life of twelve soldiers, the media dubbed him "troubled."
A CNN.com article, along with many others, only identified him an 'Army psychologist' and failed to make any reference to his ties to radical jihadism or make initial references to his religion - even after e-mails were found detailing his extremist views.
But when a Michigan-based militia group was indicted in an alleged plot to kill law enforcement officers with improvised explosive devices they were quickly - and inaccurately - labeled as a "Christian militia group" - not just in the body of an ABC News.com article, but in the headline, too....'"