I haven't talked about the "purveyor of perversion" Safe School Czar Kevin Jennings lately. Can't keep this guy out of the spotlight for too long because he's that dangerous.
Your public school-educated children are at risk, thanks to Jennings and his obsession with teaching impressionable youths about his perverted sexual preferences. It would be so much nicer if he could keep his fantasies to himself. But, he and his boss, President Obama, are committed to sharing perversions with innocent children.
Hope and change? Hope--not so much. Change--you betcha.
I know, Diogenes, you defend this guy. That, in itself, doesn't say much for you. Keep up the good work; you are a real asset to our children with that kind of viewpoint.
Read the latest from Gateway Pundit:
Dear Lib Media, Now That You’re Following Conservative Blogs Please Report on This Kook Pushing Porn In Our Grade Schools
"'Dear Lib Media and Journolist Members,
Now that you are paying so much attention to conservative media please report on this dangerous kook working as the Safe School’s Czar. He’s promoting violent porn and prostitution books to grade school children.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
GP'
(Warning on Content)
Last December we reported that Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings, and his GLSEN organization were promoting a book to children that included pornographic 'artwork' of men having sex while boy scouts looked on. We also reported that Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings and his GLSEN organization promoted a book to children that romaticized the rape of of a 13 year-old. The Safe School’s Czar also promoted a children’s book that detailed first-graders having sex.
But, the state-run media ignored these reports. They could care less about these porn books for children.
As founder and executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) Jennings approved of and promoted several filthy sex books for children. Scott Baker from Breitbart-TV.com and Co-Host of ‘The B-Cast‘ submitted a shocking report to Gateway Pundit blog back on December 4, 2009. The report detailed the reading list promoted to 7-12 grade students by Kevin Jennings’ GLSEN organization. This material has not been reported in detail at Big Government website. Remember as you read this that Kevin Jennings is today the nation’s Safe Schools Czar.
Here again is what Scott Baker had to say about this vile material being pushed on children.
'Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings was the founder, and for many years, Executive Director of an organization called the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN started essentially as Jennings’ personal project and grew to become the culmination of his life’s work. And he was chosen by President Obama to be the nation’s Safe Schools Czar primarily because he had founded and led GLSEN (scroll for bio).
GLSEN’s stated mission is to empower gay youth in the schools and to stop harassment by other students. It encourages the formation of Gay Student Alliances and condemns the use of hateful words. GLSEN also strives to influence the educational curriculum to include materials which the group believes will increase tolerance of gay students and decrease bullying. To that end, GLSEN maintains a recommended reading list of books that it claims “furthers our mission to ensure safe schools for all students.” In other words, these are the books that GLSEN’s directors think all kids should be reading: gay kids should read them to raise their self-esteem, and straight kids should read them in order to become more aware and tolerant and stop bullying gay kids. Through GLSEN’s online ordering system, called “GLSEN BookLink,” featured prominently on their Web site, teachers can buy the books to use as required classroom assignments, or students can buy them to read on their own.
According to GLSEN’s own press releases from the period during which its recommended reading list was developed, the organization’s three areas of focus were creating “educational resources, public policy agenda, [and] student organizing programs”; in other words, the reading list (chief among its “educational resources”) was of prime importance in GLSEN’s efforts to influence the American educational system.
The list is divided into three main categories: books recommended for grades K-6; books recommended for grades 7-12; and books for teachers. (The books on the list span all genres: fiction, nonfiction, memoirs, even poetry.)
Out of curiosity to see exactly what kind of books Kevin Jennings and his organization think American students should be reading in school, our team chose a handful at random from the over 100 titles on GLSEN’s grades 7-12 list, and began reading through.
What we discovered shocked us. We were flabbergasted. Rendered speechless.
We were unprepared for what we encountered. Book after book after book contained stories and anecdotes that weren’t merely X-rated and pornographic, but which featured explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air. One memoir even praised becoming a prostitute as a way to increase one’s self-esteem. Above all, the books seemed to have less to do with promoting tolerance than with an unabashed attempt to indoctrinate students into a hyper-sexualized worldview.
We knew that unless we carefully documented what we were reading, the public would have a hard time accepting it. Mere descriptions on our part could not convey the emotional gut reaction one gets when seeing what Kevin Jennings wants kids to read as school assignments. So we began scanning pages from each of the books, and then made exact transcriptions of the relevant passages on each page.'
Here’s another of of GLSEN’s recommended books for 7-12 graders. This book Revolutionary Voices includes a very graphic story about a young sex worker who praises prostitution and promotes sadomasochism.
Remember: This book is recommended by GLSEN for children–-"
Sorry, you'll have to get all the gory details from Gateway Pundit because I do not want all this filth on my blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
I'm not "defending" Jennings, Ms. MoreLies. I'm merely pointing out how you and your rightwingnut blogger buddies are lying about what he's done and what he wants to do.
You really have the nerve (and lack of concern for honesty) to be quoting at length ANYBODY closely asociated with Andrew NotSoBrightbart? Really? I daresay that lying rightwingnuts pose a greater threat to school age kids than do people who try to tell youg gay students that they don't need to commit suicide, and that they don't have to simply accept beatings and harassment from bullies.
All this "recommended reading" nonsense is not anything that goes on in the schools; it is NOT an attempt to "influence the educational curriculum to include materials". That's a lie.
Next lie: "Teachers can buy the books to use as required classroom assignments". You're kidding, right? Do you honestly believe that teachers can bring in whatever books they want and make them required reading for our students? And this nut goes on to say that the recommended reading lists are the "kind of books Kevin Jennings and his organization think American students should be reading in school". Not so; there's not even a hint that these books should be read by students in school, or that they should be assigned by teachers. That's an outright lie, and I'd bet that there's not a school district in America that would allow that to happen, nor should it happen. This is another prime example of Religious Rightwingnut scare tactics.
Almost all teachers would do no more than advocate for tolerance, as opposed to preaching Religious Rightwingnut intolerance.
Just to show the levels that these liars go to, this clown doesn't even provide the right explanation of what the acronym "GSA" stands for. Was that intentional? You be the judge: He says that GSA stands for Gay Student Alliance and it doesn't. GSA stands for Gay-Straight Alliance; they're organizations of gay AND straight students who are brave enough to stand up to some of the rightwingnut homophobic bullies in our schools and our PTAs.
And the NotSoBrightbart clone also lies about the stated mission of GLSEN. Look it up for yourself, on the GLSEN website; it doesn't read as the NotSoBrightbart acolyte says it reads:
http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/about/history/index.html
Instead of living in fear of the homosexual boogeyman, accepting what these Religious Rightwingnuts are pandering, try reading and thinking for yourself. Heck, once you get used to it, you might actually ENJOY thinking for yourself! It might open up a whole new world to you.
Diogenes, I don't know how they are getting this garbage past the school board leaders, but they are.
http://caosblog.com/archives/14419
http://www.city-journal.org/html/13_2_queering_the_schools.html
What you call "garbage" others give literary awards to. I can't say, not having read "Angels in America" but I did track down a newspaper account (not a Religious Rightwingnut account) of what went down in Deerfield HS. The AP Lit teacher chose for his kids to read the play. But he acted responsibly; he sent a letter home to all the parents ahead of time, explained that the work was controversial and why it was controversial, and asked them to decide, for themselves and for their child, if they wanted their child to participate. They had to opt IN, not opt out, and if they opted out, there was an alternate assigment, a work by Albert Camus.
(For the record, I do the exact same thing every year before I show "Saving Private Ryan" or "Schindler's List" in my history classes. That's the way you deal with anything that might be controversial.)
For some reason, some Religious Rightwingnuts didn't think that "Angels in America" was appropriate for anybody's kid in Deerfield HS -- whether or not the parents in question agreed -- so they complained about it, long and loud.
For the record, I don't see "Amgels in America" on any of the "recommended reading lists" of GLSEN.
As for the Newton MA case, it's tough to tell exactly what went on there, except that a group of parents sued the school district, and the ACLU joined in on the school district's defense. And the federa judge ruled for the school district.
Face it: there are controversial subjects that a high school kid is going to encounter. You and I and lots of others may disagree on what'sappropriate and what's inappropriate. But nothing is gained by pretending these issues don't exist. And if parents are given the opportunity for their kids NOT to participate, that ought to be good enough.
DiogenASS: as far as "tell young gay students that they don't need to commit suicide", That's what counseling is for.
Gays in school is a very small number and there's no need to expose the majority of normal children to their sickness, when all that's needed is for the child to seek psychiatric help.
The homosexual intimidators and indoctrinators need to keep your perverted lifestyles in their own bedrooms and not expose decent young impressionable children to their vile sickness.
Boogah boogah to you too, AnonyMouse.
Hate to break it to you, buttgrabber, but psychiatrists and psychologists do not consider homosexuality to be a disease that needs to be cured.
Homophobia, however, might be. Maybe you should ask your therapist? Does yours come with a profound sense of self-loathing?
DiogenASS: Ooh, sensitive topic or is that your homosexuality showing?
Are you trying to tell heterosexuals that putting a reproductive organ in a place that’s meant for defecation is normal?
Seeing is how reproduction is an impossibility through that type of intercourse, then that would make it an unnatural act.
un-nat-u-ral (un nach'uhr uhl, -nach'ruhl) adj.
1. contrary to the laws or course of nature.
2. at variance with the character or nature
of a person, animal, or plant.
3. at variance with what is normal or to be
expected.
4. lacking human qualities or sympathies;
monstrous; inhuman.
5. not genuine or spontaneous; artificial or
contrived: a stiff, unnatural manner.
6. Obs. lacking a valid or natural claim;
illegitimate.
Those degenerates need to keep their sexual perversion in their own homes, why do they feel it necessary to spread their sickness to innocent and vulnerable children?
I hate to take advantage of e feeble-minded old man like you, AnonyMouse, but when you leave an opening like this, I can't resist:
Is sexual intercourse only normal if it's performed for reproductive purposes? I mean, we realize that your wife probably TOLD you that, but really?
I'm not a psychiatrist or psychologist; I just know that they don't consider homosexuality to be a disease. You do. Are you a psychiatrist or psychologist? Didn't think so.
Let me see if I can remain discreet and still get the point across....
1. You asked "Are you trying to tell heterosexuals that putting a reproductive organ in a place that’s meant for defecation is normal?" Are you suggesting that, if heterosexuals do exactly that, then they are unnatural, too?
2. You said "Seeing is how reproduction is an impossibility through that type of intercourse, then that would make it an unnatural act." So you have universally decreed for all mankind that any sex act that could not possible result in reproduction is hereby deemed "unnatural"? That means any sort of oral or manual sex act is unnatural? Having sex with a woman beyond her reproductive years is unnatural?
Why is it that freaks like you can't simply say "You know, that sort of activity does absolutely nothing positive for me; I'm not interested"? You have to then impose YOUR values and YOUR personal predilictions on everybody else. Why? So you can feel better about the judgments you've made?
No one would seriously suggest that you should be compelled to engage in homosexuality or, for that matter, ANY sort of sexual activity you don't care for. So where do you get off telling OTHER people what they should do in the privacy of their own bedroom?
DiogenASS: While your talking about wives, I can understand why your wife would feel the need to perform anal sex with your obvious sexual inadequacies, I don’t have that problem.
Back to point of sexual propaganda,you're still not getting it!
I don't give a rats-ass what you and the rest of the rumprangers do in your own homes.
I’m not judging anybody, I Don’t Care!!!!
Keep your sickness out of the freggin classroom! That’s all I’m saying.
Natural or unnatural, there's no reason it should be taught to impressionable young children.
What's being "taught" is tolerance, AnonyMouse... and that's a lesson you obviously didn't get in school. But it was just one of many lessons you skipped.
BTW, nice job in totally avoiding the quagmire you created with your own words, in trying to define what's "natural" and "unnatural". Admit it: you're a judgmental jerk who thinks he knows what's wrong and what's right... not just for himself (which is fine) but for everybody else around him.
What you are in an insignifcant little puke.
DiogenASS: What does teaching children in school the different sexual positions and instructions in anal and oral sex have to do with tolerance?
Is that where you learned to suck your thumb, Moron?
Post a Comment