
Only in Islam could a man who beheads his wife consider himself the "victim". Unbelievable!
Read from Jihad Watch:
Buffalo: Moderate Muslim who beheaded wife says he's the real victim
"This would be laughable if it didn't involve a woman without a head. In any case, it is a classic example of the essentially universal tendency on the part of Islamic supemacists and jihadists to blame everyone but themselves for what they have done. In a larger sense, this is exactly like the jihadis blaming American foreign policy for the global jihad, and is related to the campaign to get the West to 'stop linking Islam with terrorism': Islamic jihadists link Islam with terrorism with consistency and religious fervor, but if a Western non-Muslim notices this, he is 'hateful,' 'bigoted,' 'Islamophobic,' 'ignorant of Islam,' etc. Never would the Muslims who accuse non-Muslims of 'hate' for 'linking Islam with terrorism' ever look to themselves, see the responsibility for the link as being within the Muslim community rather than outside it, and challenge those jihadists instead.
From our bulging It's-Always-Someone-Else's-Fault File: 'Hassan says he's the victim: Facing murder charge, he blames slain wife,' by Sandra Tan in the Buffalo News, July 17 (thanks to Mark):
'Muzzammil "Mo" Hassan, the Orchard Park man charged in the stabbing and decapitation of his wife in February 2009, said last week that he is an honest man prepared to speak the truth.
And the truth, he said, is that he is the real victim.
Contrary to the pile of evidence and witness corroboration that he mentally tormented and physically beat his wife over a period of years, he said, the truth is that he was the one "emotionally tortured" by his outwardly kind and sweet-natured wife, Aasiya Zubair Hassan.
Few believe him, however.
"It, to me, sounds like a desperate attempt by a person who does not have a credible defense," said Suzanne Tomkins, the clinical professor at the University at Buffalo Law School who runs a domestic violence law clinic.'
Sure does, doesn't it?
'In brief conversations with The News at the Erie County Holding Center last week, Hassan said that immediately after his wife was killed, he could have fled the country.
"I could have gone to Toronto, taken a direct flight to Pakistan, and I speak the language fluently," he said.
Instead, he said he chose to turn himself in and adhere to Gandhi's principle of "satyagraha" -- to seek the truth without selfish interests.'
Gandhi, yet! What a manipulator this murderer is! But of course, we already knew that about him: he was the founder of Bridges TV, a network designed to give 'Islamophobic' Westerners a 'positive,' 'moderate' image of Muslims -- until the day he beheaded his wife inside the Bridges TV studios."
Read it all.
1 comment:
Defendants in our legal system are free to "claim" anything they wish.
If and when an American jury ever excuses such conduct with a "not guilty" verdict, get back to us.
Sadly, people do horrible things to other people all the time. Sometimes they even claim religious motivations (see: Scott Roeder, for example).
Interestingly enough, there's no indication in what you posted here that this Hassan creep is saying that he killed his wife for religious (presumably Sharia) reasons; he just says "the devil (wife) made me do it".
When you HAVE no defense, you go grabbing for straws, as this guy is. It's highly doubtful that a jury will fall for it.
Post a Comment