What was the biggest news story last week? Was it not the Shirley Sherrod speech to the NAACP? Typically, the Sunday news shows concentrate on whatever news event leads the week.
Based on that fact, wouldn't you think that the news networks would be jumping at the chance to interview Shirley Sherrod? If you thought so, you would be wrong. Interviewing Sherrod obviously will not further the liberal agenda which the America Pravda is so eager to propagate.
Read from the American Thinker:
Now You See Her, Now You Don't
Clarice Feldman
"Alexander Marlow at Big Government points out something that underscores what lots of us believe about the rapidly fading into meaninglessness Sunday morning shows:They exist to pump stories Obama wants and hide what he doesn't want. Exhibit One--Shirley Sherrod, this week's hot personality. .
As Marlow notes:
'She was likened to a modern day Rosa Parks or Nelson Mandela, but former the Ag official, according to the Washington Post, was not interviewed on a single major Sunday morning talk-show following a week that can only be described as a Shirley Sherrod media frenzy. Though the conversation on Sunday morning focused on race in America, noticeably absent from the discussion was the woman behind the controversy. Earlier this week a handful of people in the blogosphere began to speculate Sherrod would pull off a "full Ginsburg," or become only the thirteenth person to appear on all major Sunday talk-shows on the same day since the feat was first accomplished by William H. Ginsburg in 1998. However, this was before a clip of Sherrod suggesting Andrew Breitbart wants blacks "stuck back in the times of slavery" went viral. Sherrod also drew extensive criticism late in the week for blasting Fox News as racist.
Considering the Shirley Sherrod interview barrage that took place last Thursday, to not see Sherrod on television Sunday morning sends a clear signal the mainstream media no longer feels allowing the public to get to know the real Shirley Sherrod advances their agenda.'
She's now a liability to the White House. Her racial animus is clearer and clearer. So, along with the White House, the media has given her the hook."
What a surprise! Racism is a Sherrod family affair. Not only is Shirley a race-baitor, but so is hubby Charles.
Watch the video at Gateway Pundit:
Charles Sherrod: “Finally We Must Stop the White Man & His Uncle Toms From Stealing Our Elections” (Video)
"If you thought the hateful speech by race-healer Shirley Sherrod was bad wait until you hear this…
Dan Riehl posted this video of Charles Sherrod, husband of Shirley Sherrod, railing against the white man and 'Uncle Toms'.
So will the state-run media dare play this after canonizing Saint Shirley this past week?
Don’t count on it."
BTW, the first commenter at Gateway Pundit informs us that racist Charles Sherrod is a preacher. Figures!
Monday, July 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Yeah, it does figure that Charles Sherrod is a minister. Most of the black figures in the civil rights movement were ministers. It's only the Religious Rightwingnut evangelist preachers who don't believe in civil rights.
Why is it "hate speech" to call out racism for what it is? Are you naive enough to think that whites in Georgia hadn't stolen some elections for decades? Have you never heard of the "literacy tests"? Do you think laws against voter intimidation were created because of rampant New Black Panther Party activities in Philly in 2008? How can anybody describe heinous acts exclusively with genteel words? You kind of need ugly to describe and explain ugly.
As for Shirley Sherrod, there's no explanation for why she didn't appear on the Sunday shows. Since she didn't go anywhere, there's at least a possibility that SHE chose to not go on the shows. She was on CNN quite a time on Tuesday and Wednesday; perhaps the lady had had enough by then.
Sherrod "drew extensive criticism late in the week for blasting Fox News as racist"? Really? By anybody that doesn't work for Faux Noise or NotSoBrightbart? Most of the comments I heard were to the effect that she was spot on in her assessment. One thing the Sunday morning shows DID cover was the almost universal criticism of Faux and NotSoBrightbart in this fiascol they acted every bit as unprofessionally as did some members of the Obama administration.
Is it really so hard for rightwingnuts to say "Oops, we goofed"? Rather than realize that they made a mistake with the first alteration of the videotape, eat a little crow, and move on, most rightwingnuts seem hellbent on digging further and further to find something else that they can use to defend their initial (mistaken) allegation of rampant racism in the Obama administration.
When you find yourself in a hole, Rule #1 is "Stop digging". Why can't rightwingnuts get that simple notion?
Whites are not stealing elections in 2010. All that is in the past. Get over it. The "preacher" obviously hasn't.
Good grief, will you rightwingnuts NEVER learn? You let NotSoBrightbart fool you with a snippet of a speech by Shirley Sherrod, and the truth came out when her entire speech was viewed.
So now, what do you do? Look at 2 minutes -- an EDITED two minutes -- of a 26 minute speech that Rev. Charles Sherrod gave at a University of Virginia Law School symposium celebrating the fifty years since the Freedom Riders came south. And with that edited two minutes, you reach the conlcusion that Charles Sherrod is a racist and isn't a real Christian.
I doubt that you'll do it, but I dare any of you bigmouths to watch and listen to the entire 26 speech Rev, Sherrod have that day, and then come away with the conviction that he's a racist and not a true Christian. If you do, then you're a liar. His testimony is some of the most powerful stuff I've heard. And I have to thank you for that, because I never would have heard Sherrod's speech but for your rightwingnut rant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m22eXuYNbkY
You have no idea of what's gone on in Albany, Georgia, do you, Ms. MoreLies? If you did, you wouldn't have the nerve to question Sherrod's beliefs. It's my good fortune that one of my school's administrators grew up in Albany, and he shared his life experiences with my students last spring, when we got to the civil rights movement. If you want, I'll offer you an invite when he comes back next year; you might actually LEARN something about history outside of your white Religious Rightwingnut-approved books.
What's the matter, Ms. MoreLies? No time to listen for yourself and make your own judgments? It's just easier to hear the doctored two minute clip and let another rightwingnut tell you what you should think?
Very very sad.
What's the point? I'm not willing to give up 26 minutes of my time. It's not that important to me.
The truth sure did come out. I listened to his wife, and she is nothing more than a race-baitor, accusing people of racism because they opposed Obama's healthcare bill. Sorry, our opposition has NOTHING to do with the president's skin color.
These people need to drop all the race talk. We are no longer living in the 60s. We elected the first black president; they should be thrilled. If Americans were racists, that would never have happened.
YOU sure as hell didn't elect the first black President, so you don't get to wipe your hands clean on that one! AnonyMouse can't even bring himself to refer to Obama as being black, repeatedly calling him "half-black", so he's not off the hook. And JustaDumbass wonders why lazy black people expect to live off the hard work of white Americans.
Racism isn't the critical issue it was in the 1950s and 60s, but you are delusional if you think it disappeared witht he election of Barack Obama. Look at how many white folk whine about him being an illegitimate President, and your no-more-racism argument gets flushed down the toilet.
But I do understand your "what's the point?" query. Why bother to listen and learn something? Why not just let some other rightwingnut tell you what you should think? It's a helluva lt easier, and you have too few brain cells to risk.
Make sure you keep those Religious Rightwingnut blinders firmly in place, Ms. MoreLies. If you peeked around them, even once, you may get brain damage!
God have mercy on your kids.
That's rich coming from you, Diogenes, Mr. Open-mindedness himself.
I've seen enough evidence that the Sherrods resent white people and anyone who names their daughter "Russia" while that nation was under Communism, is not worthy of my time. Check out her photo. She's old enough that when she was named, Marxism was in control of the USSR.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Kenyatta-Sherrod-left-and-Russia-Sherrod-the-children-of-Shirley-Sherrod-speak-to-a-reporter-after-a-rally-in-support-for-their-mother-Shirley-Sh/photo/22072010/2/photo/world-kenyatta-sherrod-russia-sherrod-children-shirley-sherrod-speak-reporter.html
Sorry to diappoint you. I'm not to crazy about commies.
You're not willing to listen to the man, but you're willing to research his daughter's name to "prove" he's a baaaaad maaaaaan?
What's more important: naming a kid "Russia" or having your daddy lynched by the local white sheriff.. who literally gets away with murder... as did many back in the day.
You are SUCH a superficial thoughtless waste of oxygen... and yet you smirk and dare to call yourself a Christian.
You've got a lot of work to do before you can even claim to be a worthwhile human being, much less a Christian.
"The kid's named Russia. That's all I need to know." How dim-witted can you be? That's a new low, even for you.
As long as we have shallow minds like yours, Ms. MoreLies, we'll have a racial issue in this country. You just don't want to talk about it because it might cut a little too close to home. So you ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist.
Pleasantville, indeed. Maybe if Shirley Sherrod's father hadn't been murdered by a white sheriff, maybe if Charles Sherrod hadn't been beaten repeatedly as a member of SNCC, they'd be just as willing to dismiss the notion of racism playing any significant part in 2010 America.
Jesus said "If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles." Walk a mile in somebody else's shoes? You can't be bothered to even try them on!
Post a Comment