I've already written about Obama's lying to the American people when, in spite of what he says, he plans to use our tax-payer dollars to fund other people's abortions. He has been called out on his lies, and, at this point, I'm not really sure if Pennsylvania, New Mexico, and Maryland will be receiving funds to slaughter their unborn babies.
What is clear, however, is the fact that Obama had every intention of using our hard-earned dollars to fund abortion. And he dared to say that we were "bearing false witness" when we initially accused him of doing so.
This is a great article, which I could not pass up, from the American Thinker:
Obama lied, babies died
Jeannie DeAngelis
"It's hard to comprehend that intelligent people believe Obama speaks the truth. A simple question: If an individual encourages coldly tossing a barely breathing infant into a laundry room to die and uses the upholding of the original intent to kill the baby as an excuse, is it logical to assume such a person has a high regard for truth?
Barack Obama supports killing the unborn and if by chance the infant should happen to 'burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion' by refusing to die, Barry disagrees with providing a helpless being medical care. Plain and simple, Obama is cold and heartless.
If lying were an art, Barack would be its master. Liberal pro-choice advocate Barack Obama 'successfully opposed including language in the [health care reform] bill to prevent federal subsidies for abortions.' The President intended to quietly advance an 'abortion-expanding agenda through administrative decisions.'
When it appeared a few sentimental pro-lifers jeopardized Obamacare, it didn't take much to sway the easily fleeced Bart Stupak and seven left-leaning lackeys. In order to pass health care reform the President lied to gullible pro-life Democrats, signed a phony executive order, and swore health care would not fund abortion.
Obama might as well have pulled a dirty tissue out of his pocket, called it an executive order and after getting the credulous to agree, crumpled it up and filed it in the 'easily deceived' category.
After health care reform passed, taxpayer monies are now going directly to abortionists in Pennsylvania to make sure murder is amply funded. Under the new national government-run health care program, 'the Obama administration will give Pennsylvania $160 million to set up a new 'high risk' insurance program." Named after pro-choice champions Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the program is called the Rendell-Sebelius plan, which is Obama-speak for taxpayer-subsidized abortions.
The Rendell-Sebelius federally-funded insurance program is being presented as monies to cover 'preventative care, physician services, diagnostic testing, hospitalization, mental health services, prescription medications and much more.' Get out a yellow highlighter and underline the words 'much more.'
Let's do the math. If all of the $160 million dollars go to fund first trimester abortions, which run about $350.00, it calculates to be 457,143 human beings successfully sluiced from society. If a meager $40 million dollars were spent to cover 'any legal abortion...except sex selection,' that would assure nationalized health care 114, 286 fewer sick people to worry about, which would ultimately benefit the Obamanomic bottom line.
Besides the lies, Barry has, under duress, legally bound pro-life Americans to tax-tithe to the First Church of Obama's most highly esteemed charity, government funded abortions. If Barry gets his way, which he always does, regardless of religious affiliation or moral conviction Americans will fund feticide.
Obama claims when it comes to ending a pregnancy, 'The decision generally is one that a woman should make.' Yet, the President's dictatorial decrees deny choice to those who don't support abortion. Obama is intolerant toward conscientious objection and denies religious exemption. Barry's policies force the resistant to hand the abortionist the suction and scalpel by financially aiding and abetting the executioner.
If America is in search of an apropos motto, here's one that fits: Obama lied and babies died. The next time Barack finishes speaking and turns to walk from the podium, look closely, his pants are on fire."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
"Let's do the math. If all of the $160 million dollars go to fund first trimester abortions, which run about $350.00, it calculates to be 457,143 human beings successfully sluiced from society."
Yeah, that's it... you Religious Rightwingnuts finally figured out the plan, even without a Super-Double-Secret Decoder ring from your Cheerios box.
The entire $160 million allocated by the federal government to Pennsylvania will be used exclusively to fund abortions. But not just "any" abortions, mind you, but the partial-borth abortions for which you vilify Obama. But you missed the fine print, didn't you? The money will also fund what are being called "full birth abortions", too. There will be a special joint federal-state government subcommittee set up, co-chaired by Kathleen Sebelius and Ed Rendell (imaginatively called the Sebelius-Rendell Subcommittee) that will identify all Religious Rightwingnuts, who will then be post-natally aborted, until all funds are expended. And then, taxes will be raised to fund the elimination of the rest of you.
I guess it just doesn't get through to you Religious Rightwingnuts that these high-risk pools are designed to provide MEDICAL CARE to people who desperately need medical care. You're soooooo focused on stopping any abortions that you fail to recognize all the people who may not die because of this healthcare coverage. Once again, you show that you're all about misperceived causes, not actual PEOPLE.
"No abortions! But once they're born, we don't give a crap what happens to them!"
Yea, another idiot liberal plan. Kill most of the people paying for all this madness. Then you liberals can sit around and starve to death. Other than the part about killing me, i could stand to see some liberal freeloaders have to make it on their own. Why would you, as a supposed christian, so staunchly defend killing an unborn child, or letting it lay and die if it somehow survives the attempted abortion. You sir are a spineless jackass and i would love to slap the nose off your face. At least you can attempt to defend yourself, a baby can't. Call it third grade all you want. You are an evil person, just like your idol, the skinny kenyan who smokes cigarettes. Though i'm sure when he develops lung cancer, he will spare no expense to save his own life while denying millions of babies the same opportunity to a life. I hope you are leading the charge when they come to post-natally abort me. You will immediately find out whether your beliefs were true or not.
That "post natal abortion" commment wasn't meant to be specific to you, Justa Dumbass. In fact, in your case, it would be a waste of resources.
So direct your self-righteous wrath elsewhere; empty threats from empty-headed people aren't all that impressive.
But, I have to admit,I laughed out loud at your "skinny kenyan who smokes cigarettes" comment. I can just picture you delivering that line with all the venom you could muster... and it landed like a two-year-old's tantrum over refusing to go to bed at bedtime!
Do you actually believe that only conservatives work, and only liberals sit back and vegitate? I mean, it's all well and good if you're using a lame line like that for rhetorical purposes, but if you actually BELIEVE your own BS, that just makes me so sad for you.
Not really.
Threats can only be empty as long as a spineless jellyfish hides behind his computer. Working for the gov't produces little more than a paycheck for that person. Just check out the public employees up north protesting to keep all benefits and wages while millions are out of work. Many are the same people who pay these idiots salaries. Sure liberals work. Many work for the gov't at some level. The rest are just plain too stupid to see the path we are on. If you have any kids(i hope your seed hasn't spread) then you care nothing of their future if you condone this loonacy. Oh yea, and you didn't mention abortion again in your comment. Why? Because there is no defense for it. And he is in fact a skinny kenyan who smokes cigarettes.
Abortion is the law of the land. If you don't like it, maybe you need to find a holier land that will take your sorry ass.
And how would you like to live in a country that has "termination committees" that decide if a woman may have an abortion or not? With the guidelines being the woman has to be under the age of 17 or older than 40, the pregnancy was a result of illegal action (i.e. rape) or incest, the fetus may have a physical or mental defect, and/or the woman MAY be damaged physically or emotionally if the pregnancy is continued to term.
WOW! Sounds sort of like Sarah Palin's "death panels", doesn't it?
Is it America after Obamacare? Nope.
England? Nope.
Some other commie fascist country? Nope.
ISRAEL.
ISRAEL, Ms. MoreLies.
ISRAEL, AnonyMouse.
ISRAEL, Justa Dumbass.
You want to spout more drivel about the Old Testament?
I thought not.
And, by the way, Justa Dumbass, for decades, tecahers and other public servants were paid below market rates on the pretense that the lost wages were offset by good retirement and health insurance benefits. Now, they want to take those away, too.
What do you do with your life, loudmouth, that makes society a better place? Whatever it is, I'll stack it up against educating America's youth. Although, to be fair to you, sewer systems that back up DO need attention.
DiogenASS: you said: "Is it America after Obamacare? Nope."
exactly, mandating and socializing medicine is not American and is also unconstitutional!
When exactly does a fetus stop being a fetus and become a baby?
According to Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate® Dictionary, Tenth Edition, an organism is “an individual constituted to carry on the activities of life by means of organs separate in function but mutually dependent: a living being”.
Once a baby is born, he’s a citizen of the United States, right? He’s protected under the Constitution, right?
The liberal democrats have abused the rights of 50 million unborn babies since Roe vs Wade.
The Declaration of Independence states:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".
The Preamble of the Constitution states a purpose of the Constitution to be to:
"Secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity".
I declare the unalienable right of Life to be secured by our Constitution "to ourselves and our Posterity". Our posterity includes children born and future generations yet unborn. Any legalization of the termination of innocent life of the born or unborn is a direct violation of our unalienable right to life.
25.5% want to postpone childbearing
21.3% cannot afford a baby
14.1% has relationship problem or partner does not want pregnancy
12.2% too young; parent(s) or other(s) object to pregnancy
10.8% having a child will disrupt education or job
7.9% want no (more) children
3.3% Risk to fetal health
2.8% Risk to maternal health
2.1% Other
Less than .06 percent of the abortions performed are related to rape or incest
.06% of 50 million = 30 000 with
50 million minus 30,000= 49,970,000
49,970,000 babies tossed in the garbage!
This is one accomplishment that solely belongs to thumbsucking leftwingloons and the democrats.
Gee, AnonyMouse, you're all over the place today. Did you forget your meds again?
It's nice you're trying to educate yourself by reading a dictionary, but what does the definition of "organism" have to do with anything? None of the statutes or case law relating to abortion use that term. But it's nice to know you've learned something today.
Now, once a fetus is born, it becomes a person and, if born within the U.S., a citizen. CORRECT!! You're on a roll !!
But, sadly, that's where it ends. If that "organism" (feel better?) becomes a person and a citizen AFTER birth, that means that that "organism" is something OTHER than a person and a citizen BEFORE birth. Get it?
Now, you're free to "declare" whatever rights you want to spout. Your problem is that the rest of us can choose to ignore your drivel all we want; you have no power, no authority, and no support to declare rights on your own.
Since your "statistics" are without any reference (meaning, you may have pulled them out of your ass, like most of everything else you say) it's not worth addressing, except to note that it's not "babies" being tossed in the garbage; it's fetuses being legally terminated.
Now, do America a favor and go toss yourself out in the garbage.
DiogenASS: Here's the link to the statistics that I pulled out of your whiki-ass.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States
How is it possible the Supreme Court decided not to decide when life begins and then turned around and overturned the laws of 50 different states in Roe v.Wade?
Then the Supreme Court's verdict rested upon two sentences. "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the
development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to an answer."
Although the sentences sounded both innocuous and unpretentious, they were neither. The Supreme Court's non-decision was not innocuous. It overturned state laws that protected the unborn and has resulted in over 50 million abortions in the United States.
The decision also seems unpretentious by acknowledging that it did not know when life begins.
The Supreme Court clearly stated that it does not know when life begins and then violated the very spirit of this legal principle by acting as if it just proved that no life existed in the womb.
If you don't know when life begins then how can you rule that there is no life?
That alone proves that the SCOTUS is as dumb as you and the rest of the thumbsucking leftwingloons!
Pretty good stuff, AnonyMouse! Once again, you head straight to Wikipedia for knowledge -- just as you claim I do, which I do on occasion, but not as often as you, apparently.
But when I do quote Wikipedia -- or any other source -- I know it's only right to give them the credit for the idea. That's the way honest writers deal with it.
As for the rest of your argument, I have to hand it to you: it's one of the more thoughtful analyses you've ever offered on this Religious Rightwingnut blog. You even snuck in a few fifty-cent words, like "innocuous" and "unpretentious", showing you're working on higher-order word choice, like a good high school student should.
But, again like a high school student, your plagiarism stuck out like a sore thumb. It was too easy to see that those were not words that came out of YOUR mouth. And, in 0.46 seconds, I found the source of your brilliance... the words you stole from somebody else, and tried to pretend they were yours:
http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/arg-abor.html
Some evangelist preacher, Kerby Anderson, wrote an essay over a decade ago that provided, in his opinion, the Biblical, medical, legal, and philosophical arguments against abortion. Good stuff: I know when I need medical or legal advice, my first thought is to visit my local evangelical preacher. And, when I need spiritual guidance, I turn to Glenn Beck.
The REALLY funny thing is that Anderson's essay was also plagiarized on seve ral websites that specialize in selling research papers to high school and college students, to pass off as their own. Is that where you found Anderson's essay?
You've been a very naughty student, AnonyMouse. Sadly, you earned an "F" on this assignment, and now you have to go sit in the corner and write "Never again will I try to seem intelligent when I know I'm not" 1000 times.
DiogenASS: Everybody’s opinion on any subject comes from the knowledge and research of others: books, internet and videos.
It's a process called learning.
you do know what that means, don't you moron?
If I believe what’s in the bible, then why wouldn’t I repeat what I’ve read to others?
did you know how to finger-paint before learning and mastering your craft from someone else?
I rest my case!
It's called "plagiarism", moron, not "learning". You rightwingnnuts think that all you have to do to be "smart" is to cut and paste someone else's ideas. they're not your own... it's what's been spoon-fed to you. You're a walking breathing parrot.
Education is all about taking what you've previously picked up from various other sources and putting it together, on your own, to express your own opinion. If you want to quote another source to lend credibility to your pronouncements, that's fine, but you have to credit your sources. It takes thinking and learning... something you're obviously not capable of yourself. So you make do by stealing someone else's education.
You're a failure, AnonyMouse. In school and in life.
Take your stupid self over to one of these arab countries you constantly defend, then let your views on abortion and homosexuality be known. And illegal immigration is also against the law, but your commie friends turn a blind eye to this particular law. That's the problem with liberals, they viciously defend some laws and ignore others, all for political gain of course.
Post a Comment