Obama and company don't want a crisis to go to waste. So says Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. With Obama appearing more and more incompetent, as well as indifferent, in his handling of the Gulf oil spill, we need to consider if this crisis is being used to further his leftist agenda.
No question, but that he's been clueless when it comes to how to deal with this disaster. The real question is: Does he want this problem resolved? His image has suffered, but it sure has a potential to fulfill his desired Cloward-Piven strategy.
Read from the American Thinker:
Don't be fooled by Obama's 'incompetence'
Stu Tarlowe
"It is a tremendous mistake to think that the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico will help convince Americans of Barack Obama's incompetence. Obama's true agenda is so insidious that even his inability to handle a crisis serves his greater strategy.
And that strategy has a name: it is the Cloward-Piven Strategy. Named for the two Leftist sociology professors who formulated it, its purpose is to bring about the demise of capitalism by overloading the system, largely by making more people desperate and dependent on the government.
Thus, Cloward-Piven's goals are served by more and more aliens flooding across the border and filling jails, emergency rooms and welfare rolls. It is also served by the mortgage crisis; in fact, Professors Cloward and Piven were the creators of ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), which helped pressure banks to implement the lending policies that precipitated that crisis. But Cloward-Piven seeks a financial crisis far wider-ranging and more encompassing than a mere mortgage meltdown.
So if the oil spill in the Gulf manages to destroy the fishing and tourist industries in that region, shut down oil drilling, raise the price of oil and of food all over the country, and bring more and more Americans to a financial breaking point and thus dependent on food stamps and other government programs, Obama and Co. will smile and nod at one another as the Cloward-Piven strategy hums merrily along.
Anything that puts a greater strain on government services -- and the inability of those services, through incompetence and complex bureaucracy to actually improve things - advances the goals of Cloward-Piven. The more desperate and demoralized the American people become, and the more preoccupied we are with simple survival, the better our new 'leaders' like it, and the closer they get to assuming total and complete control of every aspect of our lives.
Read about the Cloward-Piven Strategy in greater detail in an American Thinker article from November 23, 2009, 'Cloward-Piven Government' by James Simpson.
Simpson explains that even the patently unconstitutional laws and policies implemented by the Obama regime are a deliberate part of the strategy, because in addition to using financial crises to bring about the desired changes in our way of life, it is necessary to render our Constitution impotent and irrelevant.
If you think the Gulf oil spill spells trouble for Obama, you're just not looking at as big a picture as he's looking at, and you just don't realize how much trouble we're all in."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Everything about Obama is insidious in nature. He is not to be trusted for even a millisecond. His supporters are equally devious and it is common knowledge amongst these Marxists that Obama's true policy must take effect in order for the complete ruination of the greatest nation on earth.
This is exactly why we must push and indeed force our elected representatives to investigate the current Obama/Sestak/Romanoff bribes. These offenses are impeachable. Second, we must demand Obama's czars to come forward and present documents on what exactly they've been working on and for what reason(s), and for whom. It is time these democrats answered these tough questions. Sooner or later these [...] will pay for their abuse. Same goes for the supporters who are at best traitors, child molesters, all whom are criminals preying on the minds of our vulnerable students.
Does this about cover it? lol
Pretty funny stuff, Boi. For a moment, you had me convinced that you are actually crazy enough to buy that nonsense.., but then you laughed in the end, letting us know that you were just joking.
Nice job!
Now, Ms. MooreLies, I do have a question for you. I note that there's a [...] inserted towards the end of Boi's parody of a rightwingnut madman. Now, that's usually your convention to denote something you've deleted from someone else's words... but, in the past, you've only done that with the drivel you cut & paste from other rightwingnut bloggers to keep your own blog afloat. Did you choose to edit Boi's comment this time? If so, why? And, if it's because you found Boi's word choice to be somehow offensive, why didn't you just delet his entire comment, the way you have with my comments in the past?
Please don't tell me you operate with a double standard, Ms. MooreLies. It would destroy ALL my faith in the rightwingnut blogosphere!
In case you haven't noticed, Diogenes, I haven't deleted ANYTHING that you've written in a very long time. So spare me the "poor little Diogenes getting picked on" rhetoric.
I edited the comment you refer to because of an inappropriate word used to depict Obama, and no, it was not the N word. I've said before I cannot in good conscience permit disrespectful terms used for Obama because of his position as president, much as I would like to.
Here again is the obama supporter that we know all to well. Insults are thrown instead of a logical different point of view. Another liberal idiot temper tantrum. You made fun of his comments, but didn't prove at all why you disagreed, other than you are a jim jones type follower of commieobama. Keep drinking that koolaid pal.
Post a Comment