Sunday, June 6, 2010

Saddam's WMD in Syria?

I am not alone when I suggest that Saddam Hussein did indeed have WMD, and that they were moved to Syria. Even Obama's new choice for director of national intelligence, General James Clapper, has supported this theory.

What a surprise! Don't expect to hear this story from the corrupt American Pravda.

Read from Pajamas Media:

Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldn’t be written just yet.
by Ryan Mauro

"Ha’aretz has revived the mystery surrounding the inability to find weapons of mass destruction stockpiles in Iraq, the most commonly cited justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom and one of the most embarrassing episodes for the United States. Satellite photos of a suspicious site in Syria are providing new support for the reporting of a Syrian journalist who briefly rocked the world with his reporting that Iraq’s WMD had been sent to three sites in Syria just before the invasion commenced.

The newspaper reveals that a 200 square-kilometer area in northwestern Syria has been photographed by satellites at the request of a Western intelligence agency at least 16 times, the most recent being taken in January. The site is near Masyaf, and it has at least five installations and hidden paths leading underneath the mountains. This supports the reporting of Nizar Nayouf, an award-winning Syrian journalist who said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Hussein’s WMDs were in Syria.

One of the three specific sites he mentioned was an underground base underneath Al-Baida, which is one kilometer south of Masyaf. This is a perfect match. The suspicious features in the photos and the fact that a Western intelligence agency is so interested in the site support Nayouf’s reporting, showing that his sources in Syria did indeed have access to specific information about secret activity that is likely WMD-related. Richard Radcliffe, one of my co-writers at WorldThreats.com, noticed that Masyaf is located on a road that goes from Hamah, where there is an airfield sufficient to handle relatively large aircraft, into Lebanon and the western side of the Bekaa Valley, another location said to house Iraqi weapons.

It seems to be commonly accepted that Iraq did not have WMDs at all. The intelligence was obviously flawed, but the book has not been closed on what actually happened. The media blasted the headline that Charles Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group tasked with finding out if Saddam had WMDs, concluded that a transfer did not occur. In reality, his report said they were 'unable to complete its investigation and is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war' due to the poor security situation.

Although no conclusion was made, Duelfer has since said that he is 'convinced' that no WMD went to Syria. He is a competent and credible individual, but there is evidence that key information on this possibility was not received by the Iraq Survey Group, which had many of its own problems.

On February 24, 2009, I went to see a talk Duelfer gave at the Free Library of Philadelphia to promote his book. He admitted there were some 'loose ends' regarding the possibility that Iraqi WMD went to Syria, but dismissed them. Among these 'loose ends,' Duelfer said, was the inability to track down the Iraqis who worked for a company connected to Uday Hussein that sources said had driven 'sensitive' material into Syria. A Pentagon document reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD. These trucks have been talked about frequently and remain a mystery.

During the question-and-answer period and during a follow-up interview, Duelfer made several interesting statements to me that reinforced my confidence that such a transfer occurred, although we can not be sure of the extent of it.

General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force, claimed in his 2006 book that he knew two Iraqi pilots that flew WMD into Syria over the summer of 2002, which came before a later shipment on the ground. I asked Duelfer if Nizar Nayouf or the two Iraqi pilots were spoken with.

'I did not interview the pilots nor did I speak with the Syrian journalist you mentioned,' he said. 'We were inundated with WMD reports and could not investigate them all. … To narrow the problem, we investigated those people and places we knew would have either been involved or aware of regime WMD activities.'

He then told me that the lack of testimony about such dealings is what convinced him that 'a lot of material went to Syria, but no WMD.' He cited the testimony of Naji Sabri, the former Iraqi foreign minister, in particular.

'I knew him very well, and I had been authorized to make his life a lot better, or a lot worse,' he told me.

He said that Sabri’s position would make him aware of any such deal between the two countries. However, in his book, Duelfer said that Sabri had nothing to do with any of Iraq’s WMD efforts at any time. 'His statements on WMD from an intelligence perspective would have been irrelevant,' Duelfer wrote.

'Someone among the people we interviewed would have described this,' Duelfer said. However, such testimony does exist. Don Bordenkircher, who served as the national director of jail and prison operations in Iraq for two years, told me that he spoke to about 40 Iraqis, either military personnel or civilians assigned to the military, who talked about the WMDs going to Syria and Lebanon, with some claiming they were actually involved. Their stories matched and were not contradictory, he said. Another military source of mine related to me how an Iraqi intelligence captain in Al-Qaim claimed to have witnessed the movement of suspicious convoys into Syria between February and March 2003.

I also asked Duelfer if he was aware of the intelligence provided by the Ukrainians and other sources that the Russians were in Iraq helping to cleanse the country shortly before the invasion. His facial expressions before I even finished the question showed he genuinely had never even heard of this."


Read the rest.

4 comments:

Diogenes said...

Yep, the WNDs were there, all along, until they were transferred to Syria.

And say hello to Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny, while you're at it.

Unsubstantiated sources, unnamed Western intelligence agencies, unnamed officials.... yada yada yada. Do you really believe that American spy satellites did not monitor what was going in and out of Iraq in the lead-up to the invasion? Of COURSE they did. And they came up empty.

But this is just your style, Ms. MoreLies. Believe whatever fits into your rightwingnut worldview, and make others disprove your unfounded beliefs. Believing in God is one thing; believing in George Bush and Dick Cheney is another.

PacPalBoi25 said...

There was sufficient time for Saddam Hussein to move the weapons of mass destruction to either a secret hiding place or to another friendly country. The US Intelligence Agencies have failed many times.

As for the trolling liberal liar's comment above....I'd say he/she/it has been drinking too much oBUMa-aid.

Diogenes said...

There was also time for Saddam to have the WMD beamed up to the mother ship, too. And there was sufficient time for Saddam to ingest every WMD, with the plan to smuggle them into another country and "divest" himself of the WMD in a turnpike rest stop.

There is also time for Ms. MoreLies and/or The Boi to exhibit at least minimal brain function.

None of which means it'll HAPPEN, just because there was time to do so....

Anonymous said...

WEll, coming from a family of military personnel, I can tell you we, the American people are CLUELESS when it comes to what is truly going on. There definitely were wmd's.. most biological weaponry and Russia was amazingly stealth in moving it to Syria without our knowledge. The CIA did not do their jobs correctly.. we caught wind a little too late, but we will probably see the fallout of the transported WMD's in our lifetimes. It's nice to believe in fairytales.. it's also very simple to blame just one administration for our war. It's not so simple and formulaic. There are so many pieces to the political puzzle and Bush kept us safe. Period. Wait and see folks. Wait and see.