Yesterday was the 66th anniversary of D-Day, a historical day for most Americans. Ronald Reagan gave a stirring speech in Normandy, France on the 40th anniversary in 1984. It went as follows:
".... This place, Pointe du Hoc, in itself was moving and majestic. I stood there on that windswept point with the ocean behind me. Before me were the boys who forty years before had fought their way up from the ocean. Some rested under the white crosses and Stars of David that stretched out across the landscape. Others sat right in front of me. They looked like elderly businessmen, yet these were the kids who climbed the cliffs.
We're here to mark that day in history when the Allied armies joined in battle to reclaim this continent to liberty. For four long years, much of Europe had been under a terrible shadow. Free nations had fallen, Jews cried out in the camps, millions cried out for liberation. Europe was enslaved and the world prayed for its rescue. Here, in Normandy, the rescue began. Here, the Allies stood and fought against tyranny, in a giant undertaking unparalleled in human history.
We stand on a lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France. The air is soft, but forty years ago at this moment, the air was dense with smoke and the cries of men, and the air was filled with the crack of rifle fire and the roar of cannon. At dawn, on the morning of the 6th of June, 1944, two hundred and twenty-five Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs.
Their mission was one of the most difficult and daring of the invasion: to climb these sheer and desolate cliffs and take out the enemy guns. The Allies had been told that some of the mightiest of these guns were here, and they would be trained on the beaches to stop the Allied advance.
The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers at the edge of the cliffs, shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb. They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and began to pull themselves up. When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again. They climbed, shot back, and held their footing. Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top, and in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe. Two hundred and twenty-five came here. After two days of fighting, only ninety could still bear arms.
And behind me is a memorial that symbolizes the Ranger daggers that were thrust into the top of these cliffs. And before me are the men who put them there. These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. And these are the heroes who helped end a war. Gentlemen, I look at you and I think of the words of Stephen Spender's poem. You are men who in your "lives fought for life and left the vivid air signed with your honor." {...}
Forty summers have passed since the battle that you fought here. You were young the day you took these cliffs; some of you were hardly more than boys, with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet you risked everything here. Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here? We look at you, and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief. It was loyalty and love.
The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead, or on the next. It was the deep knowledge -- and pray God we have not lost it -- that there is a profound moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause. And you were right not to doubt.
You all knew that some things are worth dying for. One's country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for, because it's the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty. All of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew the people of your countries were behind you.
The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They fought -- or felt in their hearts, though they couldn't know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4:00 am. In Kansas they were kneeling on their porches and praying. And in Philadelphia they were ringing the Liberty Bell.
Something else helped the men of D-day; their rock-hard belief that Providence would have a great hand in the events that would unfold here; that God was an ally in this great cause. And so, the night before the invasion, when Colonel Wolverton asked his parachute troops to kneel with him in prayer, he told them: "Do not bow your heads, but look up so you can see God and ask His blessing in what we're about to do." Also, that night, General Matthew Ridgway on his cot, listening in the darkness for the promise God made to Joshua: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."
These are the things that impelled them; these are the things that shaped the unity of the Allies. {...}
We in America have learned bitter lessons from two world wars. It is better to be here ready to protect the peace, than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We've learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent. {...}
We will pray forever that someday that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it.
We're bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We're bound by reality. The strength of America's allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe's democracies. We were with you then; we're with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.
Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."
Strengthened by their courage and heartened by their value [valor] and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.
Thank you very much, and God bless you all."
Yesterday, President Obama got his chance to recognize the sacrifices our brave soldiers made on that historical day. His tribute went as follows:
__________________________________.
Good one, Mr. President. Granted, the 40th anniversary was more significant than a 66th anniversary. But, couldn't you find it within your America-hating self the decency to honor the Greatest Generation for the debt they paid to secure our freedoms?
No, apparently not. You were too busy being the Partier-in-Chief. Enough with the parties, sir, do the job you were elected to do.
Monday, June 7, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Oh, BS. This double standard of yours is sick.
Obama went to Normandy last year for the 65th anniversary. Georgie Bush went in 2004 for the 60th anniversary.... once in his 8 years in office.
You just cannot resist taking shots at the President of the United States -- especially cheap shots -- simply because he's not the guy you voted for. Tough crap, you lost. Get over it, and show some evenhandedness or (dare I say) civility?
You mean like you did to George W. Bush. You liberals sure like to dish it out, but when it's our turn to show opposition, all of a sudden, that's over the top.
Did you ever once hear me -- or ANYBODY -- pick on Bushie for something so inconsequential? Invading foreign countries? Yeah. Allowing torture (and, now, reveling in it)? Yeah. Infringing on our personal liberty with the Patriot Act? Yeah. Not "properly" recognizing D-Day? No.
And if by chance you're going to cite someone like Cindy Sheehan or Code Pink or any of the most radical leftwingnuts as "evidence", please don't lump me in with that crowd. Because, if you do use them as support for your incessant critiques, then you're comparing yourself to the worst of the leftwingnuts.
You are the same type of moron that over in england or france is bemoaning the fact that America is the greatest country in history. These dumb@#$s would be german if America hadn't stepped in. I doubt that you would risk your life in defense of freedom as so many did back then and still do today. Tyranny is ever present in reality, just not in liberal fantasies.
JD, I never said ANYTHING disparaging about the D-Day vets or their actions in our defense. Nor do I have any problems with anything said by President Reagan in 1984. Is it that difficult for you to stay focused on an issue? Do you always have such trouble with basic comprehension?
All I commented on was the nonsense that Obama was somehow disparaging D-Day with his actions this year. It's petty nonsense from Ms. MoreLies -- and please notice that she didn't deny its pettiness at all; she merely tried to excuse her harping on the second grade "defense" of "Well, Susie did it first!"
Call it petty all you like, but it shows the disregard our president has for our military and the sacrifices made to secure our freedoms. All I wanted from Obama was for him to recognize the sacrifices made and give some type of tribute to these brave men. It didn't have to be on a big scale.
Did you get your panties in a wad when George W. Bush did nothing to commemorate D-Day for six of the eight years he was in office?
"Bush administration commemorated D-Day in 2001 and 2004, but spent others in meetings and at least one concert. White House archives of June 6 for each year President Bush was in office only show Bush commemorating D-Day in 2001 and 2004. In 2001, Bush dedicated a D-Day memorial in Virginia, and in 2004, he went to Normandy to mark the 60th anniversary of D-Day. There are no "news" references to D-Day in 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, or 2008."
http://mediamatters.org/research/201006070009
Hypocrisy, thy name is Ms. MoreLies.
If that is the case and Bush said nothing all those years (coming from Media Matters makes it questionable), then he was wrong as well. Those who paid the price on D-Day should always be acknowledged for their sacrifice.
I've had my problems with Bush, but he could never have been accused of not loving his country or the military. Sadly, we cannot say that about the big apologist, Obama. That is why people are quick to pounce on him when he ignores moments like these.
BS.
Obama doesn't make a coment, you say he doesn't care about the military.
Obama DOES make a comment, and you denounce him as hypocritical.
Face it: nothing Obama does will be good enoug for you. We all recognize that in you, why don't you just admit it?
Actually, I like his drone activity in the war against terror.
Post a Comment