The American al-Jazeera has been giving only one side of the flotilla story: Israel is a bully! Pity the poor Palestinians!
Listen to what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has to say in response to the condemnation of Israel, via Atlas Shrugs:
The brilliant Krauthammer said the following, via Atlas Shrugs:
"The fundamental deception here is the use of the word 'humanitarian.' As we saw, humanitarians don’t wield iron clubs and would have killed the Israelis had the Israelis not drawn their pistols in self-defense. But there’s a larger issue here. What exactly is the humanitarian crisis that the flotilla was actually addressing? There is none. There’s no one starving in Gaza. The Gazans have been supplied with food and social services, education, by the U.N., by UNRWA, for 60 years in part with American tax money. Second, when there are humanitarian needs, the Israelis allow every day food and medicine overland into Gaza.
The reason that it did not want to allow this flotilla is because, as the spokesman for the flotilla said herself, this was not about humanitarian relief, it was about breaking the blockade. And the reason the Israelis have a blockade is because they only want to allow humanitarian supplies and not weaponry. Look, the proof of that is the fact that if you look at a map of Gaza, you’ll see that Israelis only control three sides of this rectangle. There’s a fourth side on the Egyptian side. So it is an Egyptian-Israeli blockade. The Egyptians have the same problem with Gaza. People accuse Israelis of having a blockade because they’re racist, they’re anti-Muslim, anti-Arab. The Egyptians are Muslim and Arab, and they’ve gone to war three times on behalf of the Palestinians.
So why do they have exactly the same blockade? Because Gaza is run by Hamas, a terror entity that wants to import weaponry and resume the war against Israel. The man who made the announcement that we saw earlier, explaining the commando raid, is the defense minister of Israel. He’s not right winger. He’s Ehud Barak, who’s the leader of Labor, the party of Yitzhak Rabin, Golda Meir, the party of the left, the man who 10 years ago this summer offered the Palestinians a peace agreement that would provide a Palestinian state, division of Jerusalem and an end of the conflict. The Palestinians said no, and Gaza two years ago declared war on Israel. That’s why you’ve got a blockade, and the flotilla was not about humanitarian needs. It was about smashing the blockade."
Sarah Palin goes after the American al-Jazeera for their biased coverage on the story. Try to imagine, if you can, that Palin was president instead of the America-hating, Israel-hating Obama. What a difference that would make! A president standing up for the nation of Israel. America would be reaping God's favor for blessing the Jewish nation.
From Gateway Pundit:
"The media, as usual, seems to be reporting only one side of the Israeli Flotilla incident. Don’t trust the mainstream media to give you both sides of a story fairly… you must seek out fair reporting to ensure you have all the information.
As far too many in the media, and in various governments, rush to condemn Israel, we must put the recent events off Israel’s coast into the right perspective. This 'relief' convoy was not about humanitarian aid, as the liberal mainstream media keeps reporting. The whole operation was designed to provoke Israel, not to provide supplies to Palestinians held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza. Anyone who sees the video of Israeli commandos being attacked as they land on that ship knows the people aboard were vicious thugs, not 'peace activists.' The media insults our intelligence with their outright mischaracterization of who these enemies are.
Israel delivers thousands of tons of humanitarian supplies every week to Gaza. These ships could have offloaded their cargoes at a nearby Israeli port if they really wanted to help the people of Gaza. Instead, they chose to incite confrontation and violence. Israel has a right to prevent arms shipments to Gaza that will be used to target innocent Israelis, so they were legitimately checking the cargo on the flotilla. Turkey has chosen to condemn Israel but we should be asking some serious questions about Turkey’s role in this whole affair. Why is a fellow member of NATO sponsoring such a dangerous publicity stunt? As one expert points out: 'Three ships of that six-ship pro-terror convoy flew Turkish flags and were crowded with Turkish citizens. The Ankara government – led by Islamists these days – sponsored the ‘aid’ operation in a move to position itself as the new champion of the Palestinians. And Turkish decision-makers knew Israel would have to react – and were waiting to exploit the inevitable clash. The provocation was as cynical as it was carefully orchestrated.”
We can only hope the Obama Administration does not join the anti-Israel chorus in the aftermath of this staged confrontation. Please, Mr. President, we need to let Israelis know we stand with them in their fight against terrorists and those who arm and support them. America and her ally, Israel, stand by waiting for your response."
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
"Try to imagine, if you can, that Palin was president instead of the America-hating, Israel-hating Obama. What a difference that would make!" ACCCCK! NOOOOO!!! Thank goodness we'll never see that realized... it'd be bigger than the Nightmare on Elm Street.
"A president standing up for the nation of Israel. America would be reaping God's favor for blessing the Jewish nation." You just don't get it, do you? A President's job is NOT to satisfy Religious Rightwingnuts that we have God's favor. A President's job is NOT to bless the Jewish nation. The modern state of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Old Testament, and it cannot and hsould not be treated as such. It is just another country -- a strong ally, certainly, but just another country. (And, currently, a country being led by a rightwingnut.)
BTW, what the heck is "Israel Guilty to Proven Guilty" supposed to mean? Did you mean to say "Israel Guilty Until Proven Guilty"? (Not that that makes much more sense.)
Maybe "Israel Guilty Until Proven Innocent"? If that's the case, it is EXTREMELY laughable coming from you, Little Ms. "I-Can-Say-Anything-I-Want-and-Claim-Anything-I-Care-Until-Someone-Proves-Me-Wrong" MoreLies!
Thanks for pointing that out to me. "Guilty until proven guilty" means that the media and you leftists will declare Israel guilty before you know all the facts, and then regardless of what the facts are, Israel will be ruled guilty.
Post a Comment