Rush Limbaugh has astutely made the following comment about President Obama: "He's the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into."
Read from the American Spectator:
Barack Obama's Square Box
By Daniel Oliver
"When John F. Kennedy Jr.'s plane crashed into Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, in July 1999 some observers said he had gotten himself into a 'square box,' meaning that he had run into the limits of his experience and his imagination.
Barack Obama is in a square box, and observers are now beginning to talk about his inevitable crash.
There was some question about JFK Jr.'s flying experience. There's no dispute about Barack Obama's executive experience: he has none. In fact, he is the least qualified person ever to be elected president.
Prior to being elected, he had done almost nothing. Certainly nothing requiring, or teaching, executive ability.
He served in some capacity as a 'community organizer,' which Sarah Palin might say is like running a Sunday-school picnic, but without the kids.
He worked as a civil-rights attorney, whatever that means. And he taught at a law school, which may be why he always sounds as if he's lecturing to twenty-somethings.
He served in the Illinois legislature for a few years, but spent most of his time voting 'present.' Then he served in the U.S. Senate, but for only two years.
Would the directors of any mid-sized company have asked him to be its CEO? He wouldn't even have qualified for -- in Ross Perot's memorable phrase -- middle management.
He is a man without significant executive experience in life.
He also seems to have little imagination. His supporters say he is tremendously brilliant. Maybe. But how do we know? Obama has never released his college or law-school grades, and, given the educational institutions he attended (Columbia College and Harvard Law School), we are entitled to assume he may have been an affirmative-action admittee. As he was to the White House.
Besides, the relationship between brains and imagination is not clear. Harvard brains are obviously not a necessary condition for a fertile imagination. President Reagan went to Eureka College. But he had the imagination -- the vision -- to reduce taxes and win the Cold War. He inspired America and was the most successful president of the 20th century. (Roosevelt only won a war. Reagan won a war and saved the economy.)
Certainly nothing Barack Obama has done since becoming president shows much imagination. He is a complete knee-jerk liberal. Not a single action he has taken makes you say, 'Wow, that was clever.'
His economic policy is straight from the FDR-progressive mold. And although, like Roosevelt's, it has failed miserably (skyrocketing deficits, persistent unemployment), he lacks the imagination to try something else. Even his speeches are turning into liabilities. Exhibit A (or are we up to Exhibit Q now?): his Oval Office speech on BP, which his friends panned.
His foreign policy is now a Washington joke. Rude to America's friends, obsequious to her enemies, he leaves people wondering what disaster will be next. He got off to an awful start by taking the wrong side in the Honduras crisis. The good guys threw out the bad guy, and Obama backed… the bad guy.
It has only gotten worse. Iran seems set to get the bomb. Israel is friendless in this administration, even when it seeks to keep the bad guys out of Gaza, Israel's Cuba. In Europe he is known as 'Obama the Impotent.' The president of France wonders out loud if he is 'weak.' Obama has even dissed our best allies, the British, repealing (to the extent one man can) the long-term 'special relationship.' And much, much more.
Some people are suggesting that if the Republicans win big in November, Obama may make a midterm course correction, as President Clinton did. But Clinton was a man of experience. (He was also a Rhodes Scholar.) Before he became president, he had been elected governor of Arkansas, defeated for reelection, then reelected two years later. He figured out what people wanted and gave it to them. He even realized that America wanted welfare reform, although he didn't.
Clinton, George Will said, was not our worst president; but he was the worst man ever to become president. Obama is not the worst man ever to become president. But he is certainly the most incompetent, as Americans, watching this weak community organizer flail impotently against the BP oil spill, are now coming to realize.
Obama's performance will not get better, because Obama lacks the experience and the imagination to make it better. His crash now seems inevitable.
Mayday!"
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I'd still take a very smart guy with good instincts and less experience over the other alternative offered in 2008: a befuddled old fool who was stupid to begin with and whose "experience" consisted of solving problems by blowing things up.
DiogenASS: So, you voted for a community activist/organizer that in 1995 accepted the nomination, signed a contract and ran as a candidate of the openly Marxist New Party instead of a United States Navy and former Prisoner-of-War (POW) that served in the military for 22 years who has impressive credentials on issues of foreign policy and national security because you think obama is smart and has good instincts?
Since Barack Hussein Obama abandoned the "War on Terror" during his first year in office the rate of terrorist attacks on the United States has gone from zero per year during George W. Bush's last year, to at least four.
Since Barack Hussein Obama entered office on January 20, 2009, the total combined national debt has increased by more than $2.4 trillion, the overwhelming bulk of this is debt held by the public which has been borrowed from foreign governments like the communist Chinese.
The increase of roughly one trillion dollars every seven months, or approximately $4.9 billion each and every single day. Thirteen trillion dollars is approximately $42,000 for every single man, woman, and child in the United States, and is equal to roughly 90% of the Gross Domestic Product of the United States.
Cutting America’s defense spending and reducing nuclear stockpiles, while China and Russia are increasing their defense weapons and nuclear stockpiles, Iran and North Korea continue their quest for nuclear weapons unchallenged by this administration.
Appeasing and apologizing to every communist dictator, terrorist and rogue nation in the world for America's past transgressions without ever mentioning the good things America has done for the world.
At least McCain loves his country and doesn't feel the need to apologize to every dictator, muslim king, communist, terrorist or rogue nations in the world!
You call obama smart and with good instincts? so much for your leftwingloon logic while you suck your thumb!
Good for you, AnonyMouse. Finally, a response from you with some facts to (try to) back it up!
Rather than discourage you by picking at the loose edges of your facts(like the facts that defense spending has gone UP, not down) let me just address your conclusion.
I voted for Obama "instead of a United States Navy and former Prisoner-of-War (POW) that served in the military for 22 years who has impressive credentials on issues of foreign policy and national security...
"At least McCain loves his country and doesn't feel the need to apologize to every dictator, muslim king, communist, terrorist or rogue nations in the world!"
What does the fact that McCain was a "legacy" pick for the Naval Academy prove? Are you impressed with McCain's standing of 894th in a class of 899 at the Academy? Yes, he was a P.O.W., and I respect his service to his country especially during that grueling ordeal. But what qualifications does that give McCain to be President?
"Impressive credentials in foreign policy and national security"? What? Solving any issue -- no matter how big or how small -- by pulling a trigger? "Bomb Bomb Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran" is a foreign policy/national security credential??
Military men actually tend to make lousy Presidents, which isn't their fault, actually. Generall speaking, the military's answer to most problems is (A) kill it, or (B) blow it up. That's what the military does, and God bless them for taking on that role. But the problems a President faces usually are NOT best answered by (A) kill it, or (B) blow it up.
So yeah I voted against John McCain. Didn't even give it a second thought. I didn't doubt his love of country OR Obama's love of country. But, you see, love of country is a given for ANY candidate for President. (Yes, even "Barack HUSSEIN Obama", though you and the other rightwingnuts would never concede that point.) Love of country isn't enough. Threatening to blow up and/or kill anything or anybody that disagrees with us isn't enough.
That's why I voted for Barack Obama... as did a large majority of those who voted in 2008. You want to keep up with the "Well, yeah, but we're taking itall back in 2010 and 2012!", go ahead and spout mindless political rhetoric.
It's just not gonna happen, AnonyMouse. So don't be surprised, OK?
DiogenASS: you can judge whether somebody loves their country by the company they keep.
I don't think Rev. Wright is a big fan of America.
Leftwingloon Logic for Commander & Chief:
A so-called lecturer/professor (who really knows) and a community activist/organizer with no military, executive or managerial experience.
or
A United States Navy and former Prisoner-of-War (POW) that served in the military for 22 years who has impressive credentials on issues of foreign policy and national security.
who would any rational individual that loves their country and family trust to protect them from terrorist or a foreign enemy during a time of war?
Liberals like diogenASS choose a lecturer and community organizer with no military experience.
This gives you a good idea of what liberals find important for the survival of America and it's people.
“The Party” first, America and it’s people second.
Post a Comment