Conservatives Vs. Liberals
A picture speaks a thousand words. Check out the difference between conservative and liberal protests.
Conservatives: peaceful
Liberals: Out of control
One more comparison, from Gateway Pundit:
CLEAN Conservatives vs FILTHY Liberals-- A Photographic Essay
"After the 2 million strong conservative freedom rally on 9-12:
Looks pretty clean.
And, here is the filth left for someone else to clean up after the Inauguration of Barack Obama:
Via Prisca
The democrats were obviously waiting for Big Government to clean up for them."
Ah yes, the entitlement crowd at their best.
Now, we can add this photo of Obama's radical friends at the G-20 in Toronto:
8 comments:
What do you suppose those violent liberal & progressive G20 protesters are protesting about?
Their the ones that caused this economic crises to begin with, their massive entitlement programs (from cradle to grave) and their high taxes with massive regulations on corporations and small businesses that makes it difficult to operate and still make a substantial profit for expansion and job creation, which in turn supplies the protester with their welfare check to travel half way around the world to protest and riot about something they caused.
I don't remember Janet Napolitano issuing a nation wide terrorist alert for leftwing extremists.
Their like small children that throw and break their toys on the ground and when confronted with the reality that their responsible for the broken toy, they have a tantrum and desperately look for someone to blame other then themselves.
Liberalism is truly a mental disorder!
So what's your excuse for your depraved mental disorder, AnonyMouse?
Do you know ANYTHING about your vaunted "welfare"programs in foreign countries? Do you figure that liberals are liberals are liberals, no matter what country they come from?
You started out by asking what these "violent & progressive G20 protesters are protesting about". But you never answered the question. Do YOU know what they were protesting?
And no, Janet Napolitano didn't issue a warning about leftwing extremists. First off, Janet Napolitano didn't issue ANY warnings; the report you're referring to was initiated by Bush before he left office, and it was simply that, a report.
Anytime the G20 or similar meeting occurs in the U.S., all sorts of security precautions kick in; they're prepared for these sorts of protesters, regardless of their political persuasion.
If the entire worldhas such screwed up economic policies, how is it that ANYTHING works out in the end?
You're looking for overly simplistic answers to complex questions, AnonyMouse, and it just won't work that way. But it's understandable why you would try that approach: complicated things give you a headache because you can't figure them out.
And to think, there are still people in America that are buying into the leftwing media’s crap.
1.Tea party protest in DC with 200,000 + protesters, no arrests and no property damage = Bad
2.Liberals protest at G20, Police arrest more than 560 protesters at Toronto with millions in property damage = Good
1.Bush WOT = Bad
2.Obama keeps on Bush's Sec. Def. = Good
1.Petraeus under Bush = Bad
2.Petereus under Obama = Good
1.Bush handling of Katrina (in which he 'did nothing' for four days = Bad
2.Obama handling of oil spill (where he takes 60 days to even speak to the company
involved, while partying and golfing) = Good
1.Bush golfing = Bad
2.Obama golfing = Good
1.Bush spending billions to rescue failing institutions = Bad
2.Obama spending billions more to rescue failing institutions = Good
1.Bush deficit in fiscal year 2004 – $413 billion, 3.5 percent of the gross domestic product = The liberal media said: "comparable to the worst we've ever seen in this country.
2.Obama The numbers: projected deficit for fiscal year 2010 – over $1.5 trillion, more than 10 percent of GDP. = The liberal media said: We must guard against "deficit hysteria." In "Fiscal Scare Tactics,"
1.In October 2004 under Bush, unemployment was 5.5 percent and continued to slowly decline = The liberal media said: the economy as "weak," with "job creation is essentially nonexistent."
2.In March 2010 under Obama, unemployment at 9.7 percent and continuing to rise = The liberal media said: "There's no reason to panic about budget prospects for the next few years, or even for the next decade."
1.Bush = Afghanistan & Iraq wars are a disaster, quagmire with a daily body count and civilian casualties announced daily by the MSM.
2.Obama = Afghanistan & Iraq wars, there is stability in both regions and the body count and civilian casualties are none existent, there doesn't seem to even be a war according to the MSM.
1.Under Bush the world hates America: our allies love us and our enemies hate us = Bad
2.Under Obama the world hates America: our allies hate us and our enemies still hate us = Good
DiogenASS: This was published April of 2009
"Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" is the title of a report issued by the Department of Homeland Security with the authorization of DHS secretary Janet Napolitano. The report was roundly and immediately condemned for linking common conservative principles to what the report calls "...groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration." Most disturbingly, the report includes the allegation that returning military veterans may be involved or join up with such hate groups.
If the memo was not authorized by her, why did she approve the memo for distribution? why would Janet Napolitano apologize to the American Legion for the comments in the memo? why didn't she just blame the Bush administration for the comments in the memo? they blame Bush for everything else.
Napolitano apologizes to veterans over 'extremist' flap
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/24/napolitano.am.legion/index.html
show your sources to substantiate your "Bush did it" claim!
Wiki-lies is not a reliable source!
Sure thing, AnonyMouse, Check out the last paragraph of this CNN link:
"The Obama administration in January issued a warning about left-wing extremists. Both reports were initiated during the administration of President George W. Bush."
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/15/extremism.report/index.html
Logic-- if you had any -- would tell you that any report of this size that was issued in April 2009 was, in all likelihood, started before January 20, 2009.
Now, I understand your standard retort that everything is "blame Bush". But you know what? An awful lot of it IS Bush's fault. And if pointing out that truth causes you some distress, maybe you should have kept your eyes open during Bush's term
DiogenASS: it was 9 pages moron and I know it was started before Jan.2009.
If you had any snap you would have looked at documents properties to find out the date of it's creation and when it was last modified, but it seems you are to stupid to figure that out.
Created: Jan. 23, 2007 1:32:54 pm
Modified: April 7, 2009 6:20:27 pm
Which means either the Bush Administration either wanted to define THEMSELVES as "right-wing extremists" and potentially dangerous or *someone* did a lot of revising to this document, then released it.
Now you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that Janet Napolitano's DHS added to the memo before approving and releasing it.
On page (2) look at the top of the page second paragraph (during 2009 not during 2008) and the foot note of same page .
— (U//LES) Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups
during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry
out violent acts. Nevertheless, the consequences of a prolonged economic
downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability
to obtain credit—could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing
extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and
government authorities similar to those in the past.
* (U) Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or
rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
On page 3
(U) Historical Presidential Election
(U//LES) Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitment tool. Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use. Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2008 election time frame to the present, rightwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential
sympathizers.
— (U//LES) Most statements by rightwing extremists have been rhetorical,
expressing concerns about (the election of the first African American president),
but stopping short of calls for violent action. In two instances in the run-up to the
election, extremists appeared to be in the early planning stages of some
threatening activity targeting the Democratic nominee, but law enforcement interceded.
Bush’s DHS wouldn’t refer to the election of the first African American president, now would they?
The new administration approved and released this document April 9, 2009 and why would Janet Napolitano apologize to American Legion for something that was added to the memo during the Bush administration?
Come on man, your not that ignorant are you?
OK, you're too far down your rabbithole now, AnonyMouse... you're not only illogicval, but now you're making no sense whatsoever. Have fun playing with yourself down there!
diogenASS: what the hell is "illogicval"?
I know fat fingers, maybe if you keep your fingers out of you’re a-hole and on the keyboard, you can actually type something that makes sense.
Post a Comment