Sorry to disappoint you leftists, but the Times Square bomber was not a Caucasian Tea Partier, but a radical Muslim, just as 99% of sensible Americans would have guessed. Tea Partiers don't go around setting bombs, but the group that most liberals wants to pretend does not exist, the jihadists, and yes, they are from the religion of Mohammed, are notorious for committing acts of terror. All the denying in the world will not erase this fact.
This insanity starts at the top with the Obama Administration and is utilized by other liberals, as well as the American Pravda. NYC Mayor Bloomburg made a totally asinine statement blaming the attempted Times Square bombing on anger over ObamaCare. And there was the ludicrous statement by MSNBC's Contessa Brewer:
"There was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country."
Perhaps, the libs would like to blame the terrorist plot on the fact that Faisal Shahzad's mortgage was in foreclosure. The poor registered Democrat had to resort to bombing to cope with his depression over losing his house. Puhlease, give me a break. The guy is a Muslim terrorist who did what he did because it's what Islam teaches.
Read from Big Government:
The Case of the Mysterious Disappearing Religion
by Monica Crowley
"Islam? Islam? Bueller? Bueller? Anyone? Anyone?
We awake to news that after extraordinary police work, investigators have made an arrest in the attempted car bombing of Times Square in New York. Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistani native-turned-naturalized-U.S.-citizen, was taken into custody late last night. He was naturalized last year, and shortly thereafter, made a trip to Peshawar, Pakistan–a hotbed of Islamic terrorist activity and recruitment.
I have read countless reports about the arrest, in newspapers and websites big and small. So far, I have not seen a single mention of his faith. Not a single reference to his being Muslim. We’re left to deduce that by his Pakistani ethnicity and name.
Political correctness has stripped us of our ability to be brutally honest about the nature of the threat we face. It’s not from a bunch of maniacal Catholics or Jews or Hindus or Buddhists. The lethal threat is coming from radical Muslims. Even after September 11, even after repeated terror attacks and attempts here and abroad, we still cannot be truthful and outspoken about it? Pathetic.
This suicidal inability to call the enemy what it is comes straight from the top: the President will not go anywhere near the words 'Islam' and 'terror' together. His administration has contorted itself into all kinds of politically correct gymnastics to avoid making the connection, going so far as to term acts of terror as 'manmade disasters' and the fight against it as 'overseas contingency operations.'
He refused to speak the truth about the motivation of Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 fellow Americans in the name of Islam, and would not make the connection with the Christmas Day bomber, Abdulmutallab. He refused to 'jump to conclusions' about what propelled them to try to kill Americans (although he had no problem 'jumping to conclusions' about Sgt. Crowley of the Cambridge Police and the Arizona immigration law.)
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg made a ridiculous statement before the arrest, suggesting it could be 'someone…that doesn’t like the health care bill.'
Bloomberg’s comment was idiotic, but he’s not the Commander-in-Chief. Obama was notified of the arrest five minutes after midnight. We’ve gotten a statement from his Attorney General, but as of 8:30am ET, still no statement from the Commander-in-Chief.
Unless and until we can call the enemy and what drives him to kill us what they are—Muslims propelled by their religious belief—we cannot and will not win this war."
I have an idea. Perhaps, Eric Holder's law firm can defend Faisal Shahzad since that's what they do--defend terrorists.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
You see, here's the problem that Religious Bigot Rightwingnuts like you have.
You're way too quick in jumping to conclusions. We (the general public) know damned little about this guy as of yet. He's Pakistani, apparently, and quite likely Muslim, but whether or not that's relevant is anybody's guess AS OF NOW. My hunch is that he may very well be an extremist jihadist... but you don't "know" that any more than I do.
And try reading Mayor Bloomberg in context, please. He made his comment to Couric before a suspect was even named, and what he clearly was trying to say is that too little was known at that point to jump to any conclusions. Here's what Bloomberg said:
"If I had to guess 25 cents, this would be exactly that. Homegrown, or maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda that doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be anything," he said. "There is no evidence here of a conspiracy, there is no evidence that it's tied into anything else. It looks like an amateurish job done by at least one person," he told Couric.
It serves no purpose for anybody to speculate NOW as to what this guy is and what his motivations are. Let's get some FACTS before we go nuts here.
Oh, wait. I forgot. You NEVER let facts get in the way of a good Religious Bigot Rightwingnut rant, do you?
DiogenASS: While, not all Islamic Muslims are terrorist, all terrorists happen to be radical Islamic Muslims peewee!
You and the rest of the bigoted leftwingloons always try to link any terrorist acts to Conservative Christians or the Tea Party Movement including this latest terrorist incident in N.Y.
The hypocrisy of the liberal leftwingloons, knows no bounds
I'm not making ANY link between the Teabaggers or the Onward Christian Soldiers and this attempted bombing. I'm just suggesting -- as most rational people would -- that it's stupid to jump to conclusions without facts.
Post a Comment