
The purveyor of perversion, Kevin Jennings, also known for being President Obama's "Safe School Czar", has been a busy little beaver. The stuff this man is promoting for our kids is so vile that I don't want to post it on my blog.
America, you must rise up against the evil that is being indoctrinated into the minds of our impressionable children. It's as if all the forces of hell have been unleashed since Obama was elected president.
Read from Gateway Pundit:
Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom– Kevin Jennings and the GLSEN Reading List
"Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings was the founder, and for many years, Executive Director of an organization called the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN started essentially as Jennings’ personal project and grew to become the culmination of his life’s work. And he was chosen by President Obama to be the nation’s Safe Schools Czar primarily because he had founded and led GLSEN (scroll for bio).
GLSEN’s stated mission is to empower gay youth in the schools and to stop harassment by other students. It encourages the formation of Gay Student Alliances and condemns the use of hateful words. GLSEN also strives to influence the educational curriculum to include materials which the group believes will increase tolerance of gay students and decrease bullying. To that end, GLSEN maintains a recommended reading list of books that it claims 'furthers our mission to ensure safe schools for all students.' In other words, these are the books that GLSEN’s directors think all kids should be reading: gay kids should read them to raise their self-esteem, and straight kids should read them in order to become more aware and tolerant and stop bullying gay kids. Through GLSEN’s online ordering system, called 'GLSEN BookLink,' featured prominently on their Web site, teachers can buy the books to use as required classroom assignments, or students can buy them to read on their own.
According to GLSEN’s own press releases from the period during which its recommended reading list was developed, the organization’s three areas of focus were creating 'educational resources, public policy agenda, [and] student organizing programs'; in other words, the reading list (chief among its 'educational resources') was of prime importance in GLSEN’s efforts to influence the American educational system.
The list is divided into three main categories: books recommended for grades K-6; books recommended for grades 7-12; and books for teachers. (The books on the list span all genres: fiction, nonfiction, memoirs, even poetry.)
Out of curiosity to see exactly what kind of books Kevin Jennings and his organization think American students should be reading in school, our team chose a handful at random from the over 100 titles on GLSEN’s grades 7-12 list, and began reading through.
What we discovered shocked us. We were flabbergasted. Rendered speechless.
We were unprepared for what we encountered. Book after book after book contained stories and anecdotes that weren’t merely X-rated and pornographic, but which featured explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air. One memoir even praised becoming a prostitute as a way to increase one’s self-esteem. Above all, the books seemed to have less to do with promoting tolerance than with an unabashed attempt to indoctrinate students into a hyper-sexualized worldview.
We knew that unless we carefully documented what we were reading, the public would have a hard time accepting it. Mere descriptions on our part could not convey the emotional gut reaction one gets when seeing what Kevin Jennings wants kids to read as school assignments. So we began scanning pages from each of the books, and then made exact transcriptions of the relevant passages on each page.
Are we exaggerating, or misconstruing quotes that could be interpreted a different way? No: Read the passages below and judge for yourself. There’s no wiggle room. The language is explicit, the intent clear.
To be specific, the books we read were:
Queer 13
Being Different
The Full Spectrum
Revolutionary Voices
Reflections of a Rock Lobster
Passages of Pride
Growing Up Gay/Growing Up Lesbian
The Order of the Poison Oak
In Your Face
Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son
Love & Sex: Ten Stories of Truth
We can only vouch for what’s in these 11 books, since these are the only ones we’ve read through. Are there other books on the GLSEN reading list that are similarly outrageous? We can’t say for sure, but it seems very likely. What you see excerpted below is probably only the tip of the iceberg.
Let it be clear: This issue has nothing to do with gayness or straightness, which is irrelevant to this report. The point proven here is that the GLSEN reading list promotes the sexualization of children in general, regardless of the 'orientation.'
And this is not about censorship: It’s about deciding what constitutes appropriate reading material for children. We’re perfectly OK with these books existing and being read by adults; we only start to worry when these books are assigned to children. All sorts of books are excluded from school reading lists, for all sorts of reasons. Even many books once considered classics are now considered off-limits due to language or attitudes now deemed inappropriate."
For all the gory details, go here and here.
Diogenes, please explain to me how this is acceptable.
UPDATE: More from the purveyor of perversion here and here
It's long past time for President Obama to throw this man under the bus.
9 comments:
I don't see anything on GLSEN's website that says these are "recommended reading" lists. They have an online bookstore, and these books are available.
But look at how your little rightwingnut blgger friend spreads the "truth".
First, it's "recommended reading" when it doesn't say that.
Then, it becomes the list that ALL kids should read.
Then it becomes something that all kids should read IN SCHOOL.
Then it becomes something that teachers should assign as class assignments.
There is nothing I saw that says these readings should be assigned for classwork.
Diogenes, this is what the GLSEN Website says:
"Through GLSEN's BookLink, you are able to order any of our published works and others that further our mission to ensure safe schools for all students."
http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/booklink/K-6.html
"further our mission to ensure safe schools for all students"
What do you think that means? And they are broken down by grade level.
I don't know what "further our mission to ensure safe schools" means, exactly. I guess you do, or think you do.
There's all sorts of things that educators do to "further their mission". Some are appropriate for the classroom; others are not.
You have this mistaken notion that a teacher can teach whatever s/he wants, whenever s/he wants. Noting could be further from the truth. We've got approved curriculum and approved reading materials, thanks to our local school board. Anything outside of that prescribed curriculum and reading has to be approved. The odds that ANY of that more explicit and graphic stuff you see on those lists being used in class or being part of a class assignment are slim to none.
But it makes for good propaganda, doesn't it? Strawmen are always fun to attack and get your troops riled up, aren't they?
You may be right that the school boards will reject this filth. But, there's something wrong with someone who would promote it and with a president who would appoint such a person. And you refuse to acknowledge either point.
I'll take his filth over what you're peddling, any day of the week.
Face it: ANYBODY appointed by Obama... ANYTHING said by Obama.... ANYTHING done by Obama.... is attacked by the rightwingnut mafia.
The Party of No, indeed!
We're getting a little tired of your constant whining and incessant fault-finding.
As I said before, Diogenes, you can dish it out, but you sure can't take it. After 8 years of an all-out war against Bush, you liberals have the audacity to whine when we conservatives find fault with Obama.
You risk getting angry when you visit conservative blogs; that's your choice. Nobody forces you. Stick to the Huffington Post and the other liberal crap.
You cannot even admit that there's something wrong with this Jennings character. If you cannot see a problem here, then perhaps YOU should not be in the classroom because this is a no-brainer. This man is right out of the pits of hell.
Hey, I've blasted Bush on amnesty, excessive spending, bailouts, pushing Israel to give up God-given land, not defending his policies, etc.
And when it comes to McCain, I find more to fault him for than to praise him. I supported him only because the alternative was so appalling.
But, your precious Obama can do no wrong. Where's the outrage over the Afghan troop surge, Diogenes? How come you're silent on that? Are you enjoying the debt that your step-children will be forced to deal with for years to come? Are you anxious to pay lots more for energy use under cap and tax? Oh yeah, Obama's one great president!
I VOTED for Bush, just like I voted for EVERY Republican presidential candidate since Gerry Ford. It was only after I saw what Bush (and, worse, Cheney) did, and how the Republican Party felt a need to move so ridiculously far right in this decade, that I voted for a Democrat.
Jennings' lifestyle is not one I would choose for myself. He's probably a lot more radically liberal than I would be. But his JOB is to try to institute safe schools procedures. I'm betting he's pretty damn good at that -- anybody who has survived as an openly gay man in the hostile environment created by Religious Rightwingnuts has got to know a thing or two about safe schools.
I don't know if he can do the job or not. But what I do know is that you and your ilk haven't said ONE WORD that indicates that he CANNOT do his job. I'm not hiring his lifestyle; I'm hiring his abilities. And nothing you have ever said reflects poorly on his abilities.
Asfor the Afghan troop surge, I'm deferring to Obama's judgment on that. I don't know what he knows. I don't think I would have made the decision Obama made, but it's not an outrageous decision. I will keep my attention on it, though, to see how it pans out. The one good thing is that he set a timetable to get our guys out. It may not work out the way he hoped, and we may be there longer, but at least it's a start. ANYTHING is better than the monstrously failed policies foisted upon us by Bush and Cheney...
Remember these gems?
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
"...Secondly, he is not escaping us. This is a guy, who, three months ago, was in control of a county [sic]. Now he's maybe in control of a cave. He's on the run. Listen, a while ago I said to the American people, our objective is more than bin Laden. But one of the things for certain is we're going to get him running and keep him running, and bring him to justice. And that's what's happening. He's on the run, if he's running at all. So we don't know whether he's in cave with the door shut, or a cave with the door open -- we just don't know...."
- Bush, in remarks in a Press Availablity with the Press Travel Pool, The Prairie Chapel Ranch, Crawford TX, 12/28/01, as reported on official White House site
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts, 3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
Diogenes: You voted for Bush?
NEA found that 45 percent of teachers were Democrats, 28 percent were Republicans, and 27 percent had no party affiliation in 2000.
So you were one of the 28 percent?
Riiiiiiiiiight
So when did you morph into this radical leftwing extremist that you portray yourself as?
Was it something you drank?
Did you get hit by a beam of light?
Did it come to you in a dream?
People don't become a radical leftwing extremist overnight; it takes years of brainwashing, indoctrination and a continued radical reinforcement of those beliefs by a support system.
Hey, Anon? If I cared one whit about any of your opinions, it might make a difference. But ZI don't, so I feel no need to explain myself to your ilk.
Accept what I say or don't... makes no nevermind to me.
Post a Comment