Saturday, December 26, 2009

10 Worst Aspects of ObamaCare--Updated

The "let grandma die" healthcare rationing bill has much wrong with it. Here are the top 10 reasons to oppose this monstrosity.

Read from Investors.com, via the American Thinker:

10 Lumps Of Coal In The Health Care Bill
By BETSY McCAUGHEY

"For most Americans, the health reform bill that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is pushing to pass will be worse than coal in their stockings. Herewith, the Top 10 List of Things You Don't Want From Health Care Reform This Christmas — But Will Get Anyway From Congress.

1. Higher premiums: If you pay for your own insurance, your premiums will cost 10% to 13% more than if the bill didn't pass, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Insurance won't be more affordable. Sixty percent of the newly insured are being enrolled in Medicaid, the public program for the poor.

(UPDATE: See comment below. Diogenes gives link stating that this claim is false. I can't get my computer to view the info. You be the judge.

McCaughey may not have her facts right on this one, but there is NO WAY we'll add all those extra people on to healthcare and come up with lower premiums, even with the huge cuts in Medicare which will "let grandma die". Wait until the young people choose to pay the fines instead of purchasing the mandatory high-priced healthcare. Someone will have to make up the difference. CBO isn't taking that little detail into consideration.)

2. A cost you can't afford and can't avoid: Though moderate-income families will get subsidies, buying insurance is mandatory. A family earning $54,000 will be expected to pay $9,000 (17% of pre-tax income) for the premium, co-pays and deductibles, according to the CBO. If you don't enroll, the IRS will find you and penalize you (Senate bill, p. 345).

3. A one-size-fits-all health plan: Your benefit package will be prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Whether you choose basic, silver or gold, and whether you pay for it yourself or qualify for a subsidy, your benefits are the same.

Gold plans simply collect more up front and give you a lower co-pay or deductible. It's unclear how possible it will be to buy supplemental insurance. The goal is to discourage health consumption and differences based on ability to pay.

4. A sin tax on your generous plan at work: This is another equalizer to discourage some people from getting more than others. The Senate bill puts a 40% tax on Cadillac plans (p. 1,980). About one-fifth of employer-provided plans fall into that 'luxury' category. The CBO predicts that employers will downgrade your coverage to avoid the tax or reduce your take home pay.

5. Government controls on your doctors' decisions: The Senate bill bars doctors from participating in the private insurance system unless they implement whatever regulations the secretary of health and human services chooses to impose to 'improve health care quality' (p. 149). That broad phrase encompasses everything in medicine.

This would be the first time in history that the federal government is given power over how doctors treat privately insured patients

6. Hospitals closed to seniors: The House and Senate bills slash payments to hospitals and other institutions that care for seniors. The chief actuary for Medicare, Richard Foster, warns that cuts in the House bill are so severe that some institutions may face severe losses or end their participation in Medicare (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 11/13/09 report). Some seniors won't know where to go.

7. Bare-bones hospital care: Patients of all ages (and all incomes) will suffer when hospitals are in financial distress. Hospital budget cuts will mean shortages of nurses, equipment and cleaning staff. The president's chief health advisor, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, argues that hospitals in the U.S. offer more privacy and comfort than hospitals in Europe, and this 'abundance of amenities' drives up costs (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).

8. Future Medicare cuts: Look out baby boomers, the Senate bill establishes an Independent Medicare Advisory Commission to make automatic spending reductions in future years while insulating Congress from the political fallout. You won't get as much care as people in Medicare currently get.

9. A new social agenda: Money is allocated for adult preparation activities, including lessons on positive self-esteem and relationship dynamics, friendships, dating (and) romantic involvement (Senate bill, p.612). There are also giveaways to immigrants. The Senate bill hands low-income legal immigrants government subsidies as soon as they get here, instead of waiting the five years Medicaid requires (Senate bill, p. 274).

10. A tell-all relationship with every doctor you see: What happens in your doctor's office must be recorded in an electronic data base that can send the information to insurers and other medical offices (Senate bill, p. 62-66). Every doctor you see will have access to your medical history. See a psychiatrist? Your foot doctor will know about it.

These congressional tidings bring no comfort or joy. We must save ourselves from Congress' power now that it has gone astray."


While our healthcare will be going to hell in a handbasket, at least, we can take comfort in the fact that we now have a president who is a gifted speaker. How's that hope and change working out for you?

8 comments:

Diogenes said...

what's the matter, Ms. Moore? You can't stand being called out for your lies, and the lies you propagate on your website?

Hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

Diogenes: Talk about Hypocrisy? The liberals are the proprietor of lies, leftwing propaganda and conspiracy theories.

Give me a break!

The Hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds!

Diogenes said...

Yeah, another "lost" comment, eh?

I'm not going through the exercise again, but Betsy (and you, by extension) lied in Point #1, so why should anything she or you say be taken as reliable?

According to the CBO, only those people who have "nongroup" policies may see that 10%-13% increase in 2016. People who have "small group" or "large group" (which is most Americans, by the way) will probably see a DECREASE in premiums in 2016. The net overall effect, again according to the CBO, will be about a 20% DECREASE in premiums.

This kind of nonsense is exactly why McCaughey is infamous and incredible. If she were involved in the 1849 Gold Rush, she'd have focussed on the grains of dirt that were interspersed with all those gold nuggets.

Debra Moore said...

Diogenes, your comments don't get posted when you don't follow the rules, which you are well aware of.

Show me your evidence of the error of point #1, and I will take it down. I can't rely on your word alone.

BTW, a lie has to be committed intentionally. If I printed something that I believed to be true and find out later that it is, in fact, not true, that does not make me a liar.

I would never intentionally post something I know is not factual. I frankly don't care if you believe me. God knows my heart. He's the only one I answer to.

Lying is what President Obama did when he stated before Congress that his healthcare plan would not cover illegals or abortion, when he promised that he would not raise taxes on 95% of Americans, when he promised no lobbyists in his administration, when he promised to post his legislation on his website 5 days before signing a bill, when he promised no earmarks, when he promised transparency, and when he promised that we could view healthcare debates on CSpan. And the list goes on....

This man knows how to lie. Somehow, you find these actions perfectly acceptable. Interesting.

Diogenes said...

No, I don't expect you to take MY word for it, Ms. Moore. That's why I provided two links to independent sources to SHOW the lies.

I provided the link to the Congresional Budget Office report. It shows exactly where McCaughey cherry-picked her number and misled the overall imoact. Look at the top of Page 5 of the report:

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10781/11-30-Premiums.pdf

Here's another link to Ezra Klein's analysis in the Wahington Post:

"CBO estimates that Senate health-care reform will lower costs by 20%"
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/cbo_estimates_that_senate_heal.html

If you REALLY want to be honest, Ms. Moore, admit that you don't even do a rudimentary check of the stuff you post, to see if it's true or not. When McCaughey writes her nonsense, did you check the CBO report? No, of course not! Your only standard is "Does it criticize Obama?" If the answer is "yes" you throw it up on your blog. If the answer is "no" then it never sees the light of day. But whether or not it's "true" makes no difference whatsoever to you!

It's called "reckless disregard for the truth", Ms. Moore, and it's your stock-in-trade, Which is why you fully deserve the nickname Ms. MooreLies.

Debra Moore said...

Hey, Diogenes, if I deserve the nickname Ms. MoreLies, then somehow President Obama must deserve the nickname President UsuallyLies. I think you forgot to comment on his numerous lies.

Diogenes said...

Obama's a politician. He can try to change politics all he wants, but he's still a politician. He can't and won't keep all his pledges. Nobody does. I believe he's doing his best to bring changes that we need.

YOU have no problem calling him a liar. YOU have no problem entitling your whole miserable little blog "Exposing Liberal Lies". So why should anybody pull any punches when YOU lie?

By the way, it is SO LAME to claim that you can't access the links. Do a Google like I did, if you can't access the links I posted. SHOW SOME PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for the crap you put up on your blog. If you can't access those links, how can you be so damn sure that McCaughey is being truthful??

This is the whole probblem with the rightwingnut blogosphere. Five blogs post utter BS, and then the sixth (and thereafter) say "it's been reported that...."

It's intellectually dishonest, at best. And if you don't understand that concept, let me make it simpler for you, Ms. Moore.

As Joe Wilson would say "YOU LIE!"

mrwonderful1942 said...

Talk about "cherry-picking" facts! Diogenes link to the CBO relies that you do not go to check out his/her claim because the CBO qualifies all their answers with disclaimers of: "'spillover' effects on health care spending and health insurance premiums is difficult to quantify precisely, but the effect on premiums in 2016 would probably be small." "Would? Difficult to quantify?" In everyday language: THEY DON'T HAVE A CLUE!" But then Diogenes shows he/she doesn't have a clue, either; except he/she is very good at calling names when they themselves try to pass off half-truths as fact because they have no real defense for their ideas; their facts will not withstand scrutiny! Diogenes forgives Obama's blatant lies with the excuse that he's a politician? What difference does it make what he calls himself, a liar is a liar and Obama makes Bill Clinton look honest!! Diogenes should study basic economics; we simply cannot afford Obamacare ~ It is unsustainable!