Go get him, Michelle! Way to go for exposing the corruption of the Obama machine!
From Hot Air:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Debra Moore
- United States
- The Lord has placed a strong burden on my heart for the nation of Israel and the Jewish people. The anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism throughout the world is growing rampantly, and the public is not being told the truth about Israel. At the same time, Islam is an enormous threat to the West, and because of political correctness, most will not address its dangers. In all honesty, the Hard Left and Islam have united and are using one another because they both share the same hatred for America, Israel, and Christianity. As Christians, we must hate Islam, but not have hate in our hearts for Muslims. They are totally deceived by an evil religion which has them bound by its lies, hatred, and intolerance. We must also remember that most Muslims were born into their evil religion and know nothing else. Jesus has love in His heart for the Muslim people, so He expects the same from us.
8 comments:
Malkin will say anything, do anything, to make a buck. She is, simply put, a media whore. Period. End of story.
Michelle Malkin, a media whore? That's a good one, Diogenes, being that she is one of the few to criticize your savior. The mainstream media, who I refer to as the American Pravda, are the true media whores. They refused to vet a presidential candidate and have covered up for Obama at every given opportunity.
When you were deep in your divinity studies, did you happen to take a course on cults? If so, you may want to get out your notes because you are a big-time cult follower.
Funny how a Religious Rightwingnut like you is so willing to throw around the term "cult". The only cult I belong to is the 70 million Americans who voted for Obama. You're the one pushing Michelle Malkin, Rush Limbore, Sean Manatee, Bill-ow, Glenn Dreck, Ann (No)Culture, etc. Tou're nothing but a talk radio drone.
But I will apologize for misusing the term "media whore" as I didn't realize that it was coined to apply to the MSM. So I'll calibrate my words differently:
Michelle Malkin is a whore that turns her tricks in the media.
Better?
Malkin totally owned the moonbat.
This is the diference between conservatives and progressives: conservatives give facts, reasons and evidences, while socialists offer nothing but emotionalism.
You are a little different, Diogenes, than the 70 million that voted for Obama. The large majority of those voters were clueless concerning Obama's past and his radicalism.
They didn't know about his ties to Saul Alinsky, support for infanticide, opposition to gun rights, hatred for Israel, desire to bankrupt the coal industry, his plan for electricity prices to soar, and so much more.
You, on the other hand, read all about it and chose to ignore it and often excuse it. That is what makes you a cult follower.
On what basis can yo say that the "large majority" of the 70 million voters didn't know who Obama was?
None of the stuff you listed is new; it was all out there well before the election.
Or does it give you somme sort of comfort to believe, in your heart of hearts, that people just didn't know? That way, you've got some hope for future elections.
But if the "large majority" knew all those things which you find so horrible, but they still voted for Obama, well.... that means you don't have much of a shot, do you?
By the way, have you read anything of Saul Alinsky? I read his "Rules for Radicals" five or six years ago, and it's a really funny book -- not nearly the sinister guideline it's portrayed as. Mostly, it's "war stories" of some of the things he did over the years to organize neighborhoods.
My personal favorite was a group (don't remember if it was Chicago or Boston) that he was trying to organize to protest something done by a housing board. Gettingn people to get off their duffs and actually attend a meeting, to put some heat on the politicos, is sometimes difficult, and then getting them to do something meaningful once they've come out is even more problematic. So Alinsky solved both of his problems in a quite thoughtful manner. He organized a neighborhood dinner for everybody, and then they would go to the housing board meeting to protest. But dinners can get expensive, so Alinsky had only one menu item at the dinner, very simple and cheap: baked beans. And an hour later, they all left to attend the board meeting. They had a couple of their people speak to the board, and then they just sat there. And waited. And nature took its course. And the board members got all ticked off when the entire audience, one by on, sort of "exploded". GENIUS! It's not exactly up to Gandhian standards, but it IS original and effective. The ultimate in passive resistance.
Spare me the Alinsky stories, and no, I have not read any of his indoctrinations. But, I'm not surprised that you have.
As to Americans knowing the examples I stated, that's absolute bull. They did not know because the American Pravda refused to tell them. Voters would have had to have researched Obama themselves to determine his radicalism, and let's face it, most Americans don't take the time or effort to closely examine their political candidates. They listen to what they hear on TV and then make their choice.
Let's see: you don't read or research things you don't like, and you know you don't like them because....... somebody tells you not to like them?
Your ilk and the Faux News/talkradio frauds talked incessantly about Obama's shortcomings throughout the campaign. And when they didn't have any to talk about, they made them up -- just like they still are! So don't pretend that the vast majority of the 70 million who voted for Obama now want to see him in leg irons. (ALthouhg, God knows, some of you who voted against Obama certainly relish the slavery imagery that leg irons entails.)
Post a Comment