Saturday, June 27, 2009

The Greatly Emboldened North Korea



Here’s one time when ole Joe got it right; in fact, he nailed it when he said the world would test Barack Obama within six months of his presidency. The election of President Obama has sent signals of American weakness to all our enemies. Iran and North Korea have both become more emboldened than ever. If I were a betting person, I’d wager that our enemies view Obama as a second Jimmy Carter, in other words, as another foreign policy weakling.

It’s going to be a looong 4-8 years. Can’t wait to see what Russia and China have planned for us, not to mention al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hezbollah, etc.

Read from American Thinker about the effect an Obama presidency has had on North Korea:

North Korea's March to War
By Pamela Geller

“North Korea has been busy, busy, busy since the election of our weak President. This week, they have sharply increased their war rhetoric. On Wednesday they issued this threat: ‘If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all.’ And on Thursday they promised a ‘fire shower of nuclear retaliation’ if the U.S. attacked them. The media is pretending that it isn't happening, whistling in the dark, but how can anyone avoid noticing that since Obama's failed policies have been introduced, the evil forces of the world have been unleashed?

The Pentagon snickered at the North Koreans' latest threats. Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell, when asked about the North Korean threat to wipe the U.S. off the map, sniffed: ‘I don't even know how to respond to that. It's silliness. For what and with what?’

However, I do not find these threats to be a bit funny. They bode ill, most ill, for the US's preventative effect on the malevolent advancement of the axis of evil.

George W. Bush called it in his speech after 9/11: the axis of evil, Iraq, Iran and North Korea. We deftly removed the brutal dictator Saddam Hussein, but the leftists and the international forces of evil managed after that to bench the Bush doctrine, to the horrible detriment of free men. We have seen the terrible course of events in Iran, and we pray for those Iranians who are yearning and dying to be free.

And meanwhile, North Korea is on its own evil tear and it must be said Bush opened the door. In a stunning capitulation to the left and the ‘realists’ at State, it was Bush who removed North Korea from the State Sponsors of Terror list. What more has to happen to show how terrible a policy appeasement is? Nuclear tests, multiple long-range missile launches, and now North Korea is augmenting its ability to wage guerrilla warfare - developing roadside bombs. General Walter Sharp said that these North Korean IEDs ‘could be used against civilians as well as US and South Korean forces if a fully-fledged conflict broke out on the Korean Peninsula.’

North Korea is also conducting military exercises near Japan. Yonhap, the South Korean news agency, reported Tuesday that, according to South Korean Defence Ministry Spokesman Won Tae-jae, ‘the North has informed Japan's coast guard authorities of its 25 June-10 July ban for a drill’ off the North Korean city of Wonsan. This drill will involve ‘live-fire missile exercises’ and is, said Yonhap, ‘the first time North Korea has specified a reason for imposing a coastal ban.’ Wonsan is about 62 miles north of the border between North Korea and South Korea.

And then there is the North Korean ship that is allegedly carrying fissile material. To that challenge Obama is taking his signature weak approach. The US navy is tracking the ship, but China has warned us to back off. According to Japan's Kyodo news agency, ‘China has stressed that any interception and inspection of North Korean vessels on the high seas should be based on ‘sufficient evidence' and called on all parties to refrain from any action that could intensify an already tense situation.’ Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang, according to Kyodo, ‘was responding to media reports the US Navy is preparing for a possible intercept of a North Korean ship suspected of carrying missile and nuclear-related items after it leaves the coastal area of China.’ And in accord with China's wishes, there has been no interception of the ship. The US reportedly will not use force to inspect the North Korean ship.

That ship is carrying something, and a confidential source tells me it is likely planning to launch a warhead from a location closer to its intended target for test purposes. The warhead is unlikely to contain any fissile material; however, it is a test for not only Obama, Japan and South Korea, but also for how far China and Russia are willing to go.

It is also a technology test -- that is, a test of American monitoring technology. The North Koreans want to test our technology, and they know that we couldn't monitor their last big launch last April. Again, we can thank Obama for that.

From the looks of North Korea's words and actions, it appears as if they are taking lessons from their good buds over in Iran. And yet despite all this North Korean belligerence, Obama still remains firm on the missile shield cut.

It's hard to know how desperately we will ultimately suffer under this terrible presidency but one thing is painfully clear: the world's policeman has walked off the job.”


Think they would have acted in this manner under a McCain presidency? I’m no fan of John McCain, but I kinda doubt it.

3 comments:

Diogenes said...

You know what? Our options were electing Obama, and having to face the possibility/probability of enemies challenging him. or electing McCain, and have him sing his version of "Bomb Bomb Iran" (and anybody else who challenges him). We made the right choice. Obama has the judgment we need to get through these times. McCain, despite his experience ("experience" meaning he's lived a long time) has lousy judgment. He's a hothead who's likely to shoot first and ask questions later. We just suffered through eight years of Cowboy Georgie and his trusty sidekick Dick; we didn't need a re-run. ESPECIALLY not if McCain (God forbid) would have dropped dead and left Sarah Smiles in charge!

It is simply infuriating that Americans can sit back in their Laz-E-Boys and think that they have a God-given right to decide which countries get to live and which ones have to die. Just who do we think we are, making "pre-emptive" attacks on anybody we feel like? And please don't get sucked into the rhetoric, because we all know what "pre-emptive" means. We want to take people out before they pose ANY threat to us.

If ANY other nation took such an approach, we'd be screaming bloody murder about bloodthirsty invasions etc etc etc

And we wonder why so many foreigners think America is so arrogant?

Thank GOD we elected Obama!

hester said...

obama is god!!!! he's our savior!!!! its not about shoot first ask questions last. if i tell you im going to set your house on fire and im standing next to it with matches and a can of WD-40... you do your obama approach and tell me "hey now, you stop that you"... "i mean it..." guess what? im going to set your house on fire!! unless you pull out a pistol and say "get off my property"... so yes... go obama, slap the terrorists on the wrist until they slug you in the mouth.

Diogenes said...

Iran is not standing next to our house, much less with matches and WD-40 (which is not all that flammable now, by the way).

If and when that silly metaphor ever comes to pass (and it hasn't yet) then we would be justified in threating to use force against Iran, or actually using such force. But we're nowhere near that now.

"Oh" you say "but they MIGHT be someday, and then it will be too late to take action!" Uh huh. So where does that lead us? Should we have the right to pre-emptively attack any country with nuclear missiles? (Ooops, that would include a lot of our friends, like Israel.) How about non-nuclear missiles? (Ummmm, no.)

Hmmmm... how about countries that may or may not have nuclear and/or non-nuclear missiles, if they have semi-crazy nutjob war-seeking leaders? That would mean we could just take out Iran and North Korea any time we want. That'd work. But what about Israel? ANd what about the U.S. between 2001-2009? Yikes.... that doesn't work, does it?

I know. I got it.

Let's just declare that any country that has WD-40 and matches is fair game. You never can be too safe, y'know?

See, this is why tough calls like this require somebody with JUDGMENT to make JUDGMENT CALLS. Bush didn't have it, McCain didn't have it. So far at least, Obama does seem to have it. I realize it just pisses off you rightwingnut jobs who like starting wars so they can see free fireworks on CNN (or, more likely, Faux News).

Thanks for stopping by, hester. I was beginning to think that Ms. Moore's crap was about as funny as could be. You topped her for idiocy.